tracing/retini put into the table

[solids]

Bye!

at least in the 2016 version, the sample of the components in a section view is not stable. I'll explain.

in my table I create my section view, by default all sectioned components have 45° line sampling. Selecting the various samples can be modified for each component/body. perfect. sometimes, however, it is enough to move the section line to lose all settings of the fields (see section line shifts that are influential in the section view and therefore do not change the design). or even worse, if I make a table to multiple sheets sometimes it is enough to pass from one sheet to another to work on another view to lose the settings of the sampling.

Am I wrong something in my way of proceeding?
would it be possible to set up at model/part level what type of sampling should that component have?

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

the sampling depends on the material. if in the part you do not impose any material, besides being a logistic error, puts the default one set in the options.
the sampling of the material you can set it at your discretion

 

[solids]

the sampling depends on the material. if in the part you do not impose any material, besides being a logistic error, puts the default one set in the options.
the sampling of the material you can set it at your discretion

the fact that in my case not all the parts that are on the table need a particular sampling and sometimes I need to change it (without considering the scale of the sample itself), so I select it in the table and applied the changes "to the component" or "to the body" depending on the case.

in any case, beyond what you define a logical error, once on the table I impose a sampling on a sectioned component this should remain until my subsequent modification, do not reset autonomously for some reason I have still identified. Didn't happen to you?

considering that the samples I use are particular (some are customised, I modified the ptn file for having them) and do not follow the set material, how should I do to part level to associate a specific sampling for each part or body within the part?

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In the meantime a wrong courier: the sampling of the options does not refer to the case in which no material is assigned, but is the one that is set when making a sampling of a closed area of a sketch entity in a drawing.

If you change the dash in the drawing you have to do it manually for each view and if you have multibody you have to do it for n° times.
if you want the most automated thing the only way to create custom materials for each type of sampling and then assign them to individual bodies; in this way when you make the sections the samples are already correct. the thing becomes laborious if the materials you impose must respect also the various specifications (density, coefficients...).
the cases in which I had to change the samples I count on the fingers of a hand because those assigned to the materials are already correct and respecting the norms of the design (I work almost exclusively in the mechanical environment and I do not have design requirements) so I do not know if they are reset autonomously.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

always on the breach, a little less to bring back the solutions
we wait for an answerhttps://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/51983-ri-caricamento-modello-tavolehttps://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/51348-simbolo-senso-vena

 

[welcome to the machine]

Excuse me if I interfere. If I do not use solidworks but a very simple cad but in my opinion powerful and very fast ( kubotek ) , I am amazed that, in order to obtain different samples, in solidworks we must specify different materials, associated with the relevant sampling. Do I understand? How would one therefore differentiate in a section two adjacent parts but distinct and made in the same material? on the drawing table.... I was turning the lines of the tecnigraph, but with soloworks it must be done by changing the ex post sampling manually?? kubotek automatically assigns different samples and, with some care in defining the section plans, you can also not dissect the trees. then does not do so many other things proper to the parameters, but this is another story.. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

here we talk about different styles and not direction.
for years solidworks distinguishes and adjoining parts by changing the direction of the fields and in the last versions also scale the restraint if there are three or more contiguous parts.
if you want a part with the iron brick, one with the insulating, one with the wood and one with the stelline or you do it by sight or it is indicated that that part is composed of a certain material that has its specific deduction.
in multibody parts, i.e. a single file but composed of more solids like welded, you can assign a common material or assign a different material to one or more solids

 

[solids]

I hope that using the logic "material check with already the sampling I want" makes everything more stable. . However, this instability is not explained. . .

Thank you.

 

[solids]

always on the breach, a little less to bring back the solutions
we wait for an answerhttps://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/51983-ri-caricamento-modello-tavolehttps://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/51348-simbolo-senso-vena

I am sorry that you feel missing my contribution, but your answer (I appreciate and thank you for your availability) already closed the arguments by bringing the final solution.
in the specific case:
- missed loading templates: ctrl+q awards. (considered that the problem does not always present to me, I have not yet been able to verify if everything is resolved)
- symbol sense vein: make a custom symbol.

After your decisive answers, my contribution would be useless

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

After your decisive answers, my contribution would be useless

That's not true. Just say you solved that method. otherwise who reads why he has the same question cannot know or whether you have solved or whether by that method.
you could say that you just try, but if you should try all the solutions that you read on the network and that you have no confirmation who knows how many attempts you should make before you reset the right one

however you give the impression of those who take and then many greetings until the next need

 

[FabioC74]

here we talk about different styles and not direction.
for years solidworks distinguishes and adjoining parts by changing the direction of the fields and in the last versions also scale the restraint if there are three or more contiguous parts.
if you want a part with the iron brick, one with the insulating, one with the wood and one with the stelline or you do it by sight or it is indicated that that part is composed of a certain material that has its specific deduction.
in multibody parts, i.e. a single file but composed of more solids like welded, you can assign a common material or assign a different material to one or more solids

Good morning, everyone. .
I made a table of a mechanical axieme with metal parts and other neoprene parts.
in the view in "discomposed section" displays all the fields with the same filling.. Where am I wrong?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

what are the samples of the two materials?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Let us start by saying that metal is so vague that we can pass from a s235jr to a zirconium to a gold
without knowing the precise materials you can not verify that samples have and if therefore there is a problem somewhere.
Moreover, for such problems, that is specific to a modeling, it is advisable to attach files

 

[FabioC74]

thanks for the quick answer!
metal is aluminum alloy (in 2011 - from material library).. But I don't care much about metal. .
I just want you to "see" the rubber (neoprene - from material library)
see "pack and go" attached.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

neoprene has as ansi34 material sampling while aluminum ansi31
it is sufficient to click on hold to see the specifications appear.
being the difference between the two restrains the passage of the lines the visual difference is only caught with a scale of the high view (5:1 for example)

edit: avoid sending an entire project with a lot of sensitive information.
it was enough to send an ad hoc with 2 components (this would also allow to immediately find the neoprene without having to spray the tree of the parts)

 

[FabioC74]

Okay, thank you!
but at the opening of the file the restraints are all ansi31. and only if "sleep them" by clicking on them, then they are configured correctly.. is it correct?
I would also like to know if there is a command (the only one that is worth the whole design) to set a different scale of display of the dashboards, to be able to appreciate the differences even in smaller scales (as mine is 1:1). .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I would also like to know if there is a command (the only one that is worth the whole design) to set a different scale of display of the dashboards, to be able to appreciate the differences even in smaller scales (as mine is 1:1). .

knowing the version of the software (to write in the profile) maybe it is possible.

 

[FabioC74]

Oh, sorry (I thought I was in a discussion of soloworks), however: solidworks 2018 sp4.0

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Oh, sorry (I thought I was in a discussion of soloworks), however: solidworks 2018 sp4.0

You are. but between solidworks 2010 and solidworks 2020 you will understand that many things have changed.
You forgot to write it in the profile

in 2018 you can scale and randomize the hold for each view

http://help.solidworks.com/2018/italian/solidworks/sldworks/hidd_dve_section_prop.htm?verredirect=1

 

[FabioC74]

Thank you 1000 (better late I go to "study" the section you indicated me. . ! !
- by chance, you can give me a feedback on this. but at the opening of the file the restraints are all ansi31. and only if "sleep them" by clicking on them, then they are configured correctly.. is it correct? > (i.e. I would like to know if it does so to you, or if it is my solid that behaves in a "strange" way. .