transformation imported traces dxf

[marcof]

Anyway I'm colliding with sw where everything is more complicated than rhino.

imho is simpler and intuitive swx, but it is a matter of habit. Of course those alignment and tangency errors with swx wouldn't have happened to you.

And I am aware that if I want to insist on sw, I will have to do a little more because the imports of lines with iges or dwg, it gives me some difficulty.

is the best solution

and anyway I ask myself: Are you telling me that if I have to make an extruded piece I must first extrude the outer perimeter and then remove the various internal parts or even worse extrude a parallelepipedo and besides to remove the inside, also remove the external fittings? (which are not always at constant radius)

Then we got out wrong. generally it is good to keep simple sketches and for example to apply fittings as feature. simple sketches are easier to change and faster to recalculate during model regeneration.

I feel like sw because in rhino this is a snap of my fingers: design easily the 2d and extruded; then if the 2d is to correct I will destroy

I assure you that it is easier in swx; If you change the 2d you don't have to do anything because the 3d automatically updates.

Hi.

 

[re_solidworks]

a cad is simple when you know how to use it and know commands and tricks. this knowledge comes with a proper sermon and use. you will laugh, I have installed the demo of rhino 4 and I can't do anything intuition and I have to see the guide because I don't understand anything.
I find it extremely simple, instead, swx that I have used since 11 years. the difference, however, is that if with solidworks you gave a tangency bond he held it and there was no way to make him lose the tangency if not canceling the relationship.
If you give the rules these are always respected and you can trust 100%.

do the 2d and extrude it is a usual operation even in swx, if the 2d is complex it is better to break in several functions, but you are not obliged, it is better.