You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
IPdesign
Guest
to me more than a fitting seems an extrusion with shaping
stef_design
Guest
cable: eek:to me more than a fitting seems an extrusion with shaping
but how many options do you have?
it takes a week to use it well:biggrin:
Utente NX
Guest
I attached an example.to me more than a fitting seems an extrusion with shaping
I had to put the real piece to make you understand?
Can you do the tri-tangent radius? That was my question.
Utente NX
Guest
I do not know catià, but there are 5 commands inherent to the rays and each of them has many options.cable: eek:
but how many options do you have?
it takes a week to use it well:biggrin:
nx on modeling is unexceptionable... allows you to do everything.
The_Matrix
Guest
Perhaps it is better to use the 3 face blend of the nx7.5... a door.
ceschi1959
Guest
If that's enough... even a month in particular cases. :wink:cable: eek:
but how many options do you have?
it takes a week to use it well:biggrin:
IPdesign
Guest
If only I had placed immediately the request for help inherent a tritangent ray instead of asking "I want a ray like that ":36_6_6: maybe the answer would have arrived .I attached an example.
I had to put the real piece to make you understand?
Can you do the tri-tangent radius? That was my question.
Also you have failed to indicate which version of nx you are using and for which you ask for help.
the blend command as it suggested matrix with the passing of the releases had an important evolution.
therefore be quiet and try in the future to post the questions by providing all the necessary elements for you to ditch help.
:36_1_3:
Utente NX
Guest
Avercela:finger:Perhaps it is better to use the 3 face blend of the nx7.5... a door.
Utente NX
Guest
Of course if it wasn't clear my initial question, then there is a background problem.If only I had placed immediately the request for help inherent a tritangent ray instead of asking "I want a ray like that ":36_6_6: maybe the answer would have arrived .
Also you have failed to indicate which version of nx you are using and for which you ask for help.
the blend command as it suggested matrix with the passing of the releases had an important evolution.
therefore be quiet and try in the future to post the questions by providing all the necessary elements for you to ditch help.
:36_1_3:
the version used is in my signature, if you did not notice.
We're good anyway.
IPdesign
Guest
apparently it was not clear at all if placed a pdf contain a three face blend that refers to nx5.Of course if it wasn't clear my initial question, then there is a background problem.
the version used is in my signature, if you did not notice.
I'm glad you're good.
The_Matrix
Guest
If you want, I'll take it... hot as a pizza.:finger:Avercela:finger:
ceschi1959
Guest
I have noticed, in fact, the examples I have always sent them to nx7, but I have also noticed that the annexed pdf covers version nx5 and I was answering you as ip :finger:.the version used is in my signature, if you did not notice.
We're good anyway.
The_Matrix
Guest
a scanso di equivoci... (for those who have no nx or for those who have previous versions nx7.5)
before nx7.5 the tritangent only works if the "central" face (that to be replaced) is flat or is a plan.
from nx7.5 life changes ( fortunately)
before nx7.5 the tritangent only works if the "central" face (that to be replaced) is flat or is a plan.
from nx7.5 life changes ( fortunately)
Utente NX
Guest
switch from one release to another with tc and in a company like our not thing for a couple of days.If you want, I'll take it... hot as a pizza.:finger:
We agreed we'll go to 8.
The_Matrix
Guest
I know.switch from one release to another with tc and in a company like our not thing for a couple of days.
We agreed we'll go to 8.
I was joking. . .
to understand:
1) what version of tc you have and what do you plan to migrate to?
2) when do you think you are migrating?
Utente NX
Guest
the pdf attached is a gtac_quarterly.I have noticed, in fact, the examples I have always sent them to nx7, but I have also noticed that the annexed pdf covers version nx5 and I was answering you as ip :finger:.
I could also attach a gtac_quarterly of nx1 if it comes to some still current solution.
Utente NX
Guest
We currently have tc8 as signature.I know.
I was joking. . .
to understand:
1) what version of tc you have and what do you plan to migrate to?
2) when do you think you are migrating?
with nx8 there should also be tc9.
the update will have to be planned after nx8 will be released.
The_Matrix
Guest
Wow!the pdf attached is a gtac_quarterly.
I could also attach a gtac_quarterly of nx1 if it comes to some still current solution.
I often read it myself... sometimes there are interesting things. :wink:
I have never written any article.:mixed:
The_Matrix
Guest
Sorry :redface: I had not read the signature.We currently have tc8 as signature.with nx8 there should also be tc9.
the update will have to be planned after nx8 will be released.
for nx8 I think there will be no problem.. .
(nx8.5 comes out in q1 2012, but will be tagged on specific industry)
I don't remember the release time of tc9.