update parts

[fabiofh]

Hello, everyone, I have a question to be an amateur. . .

I have 2 pieces a & b, drawing to the amount in a set and inside the drawing b (which has functions in relation to b example a hole) which then will be saved externalmto as part, in a future I modify the hole of to how do I make the hole b is changed automatically without entering the atoms? Since I applied it to multiple axioms?

I already thank you for any answers :finger:

 

[re_solidworks]

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you'd like to do. which of the two parts must be dependent and which independent?

 

[marcof]

Hello, everyone, I have a question to be an amateur. . .

I have 2 pieces a & b, drawing to the amount in a set and inside the drawing b (which has functions in relation to b example a hole) which then will be saved externalmto as part, in a future I modify the hole of to how do I make the hole b is changed automatically without entering the atoms? Since I applied it to multiple axioms?

I already thank you for any answers :finger:

b drawings that have functions in relation to b?... I did not understand a bat...

Hi.

 

[fabiofh]

Sorry b is related to

 

[fabiofh]

I try to explain myself better, if the hole in b is in relation to the hole in a , and in the future I change the diameter of the hole as I do without reopening the assemblies so that the files of the parts in relation to in this case b can be changed by themselves without reopening the assemblies?

i.e. .prt files (part) can be upgraded without opening .asm files (assiemi) , if these have related functions?

 

[giging]

I try to explain myself better, if the hole in b is in relation to the hole in a , and in the future I change the diameter of the hole as I do without reopening the assemblies so that the files of the parts in relation to in this case b can be changed by themselves without reopening the assemblies?

i.e. .prt files (part) can be upgraded without opening .asm files (assiemi) , if these have related functions?

through equations?

 

[re_solidworks]

you could insert the a in part b, model b as second body (be careful not to join it ever with the body of a) taking the references you need and then delete the body of a.

the ugliness of this system is that you can't replace the body to if not with a name save (I don't think there is a replacement command of the part inserted in the part).

I don't like it so much, but I think it's the only way.

 

[fabiofh]

this is my case, I have a mobile background that goes in various furniture so in more axiemi, if I change the back groove of the chienale I would like to automatically change the width on the sides for which I have relationed with the colinear the flanking sketch of the flank with the groove of the bottom for which I would like to change the groove of the bottom and automatically without opening all the ways where I have this background.

 

[sampom]

this is my case, I have a mobile background that goes in various furniture so in more axiemi, if I change the back groove of the chienale I would like to automatically change the width on the sides for which I have relationed with the colinear the flanking sketch of the flank with the groove of the bottom for which I would like to change the groove of the bottom and automatically without opening all the ways where I have this background.

Wow, it's hard to follow you!
but is punctuation sold to gold weight in your parts? :biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[fabiofh]

hihihi not only that I am a bit in a hurry and I can't solve this problem, it breaks me open all the assemblies to update the files of the individual parts for a couple of references on a piece

 

[re_solidworks]

Have you tried with the bodies? Do some tests...

 

[fabiofh]

Sorry but perhaps I have explained badly, I ask my question even more simplified, it is possible to update the changes (report on a part) on a set without having to open it and that solidworks ask us if we want to rebuild the parts etc.

 

[sampom]

Sorry but perhaps I have explained badly, I ask my question even more simplified, it is possible to update the changes (report on a part) on a set without having to open it and that solidworks ask us if we want to rebuild the parts etc.

..or maybe it's me who don't understand:biggrin:
I would answer that question for sure. It's the normal procedure and the base of the parametric. if I change a part from sldprt, I automatically update all the set in which the part is present, without having to open them to confirm. as well as the tables.
Sure that if the parts are "badly" between them more than an update I will have a big casino biggrin, with the assieme all "until" and the tree full of voices in red and yellow.

the parameterization pushed in the great assemblies is a sort of "art" to which I think you get with a lot of experience.. a couple of perforated plates mutually between them are a cacchiata:smile: and do not make text.

But it seems too obvious to me that my answer; I repeat that I think I have not yet understood the question and your problem.. Forgive me:redface:.

greetings
Mar

 

[re_solidworks]

I think I understand and if that's how I say no. How can you update a set without opening it?
is precisely at the opening that swx controls and reloads together the data it has and if you find the modified parts it reconstructs.
external references, which inevitably create when "colleges" of geometries are normally resolved within a set. basically one part with a hole in another part in a set contains, instead of quotas, a type info:

"on the edge of the "a" part inside the axieme "b". This report is resolved (and possibly updated) when the "b" assist is open and the edge of the "a" part is found.
from this you understand that if the axieme is not open you will not update anything.

to "bind" parts among themselves without going through a set you have to do as I told you before, but it is a workaround and it is not the top (in my opinion).
in any case you would update the parts but not the assemblies and to have the "verified" relationships you should enable the option that uploads the documents in reference.

by returning to your question you could undo the reconstruction of the assemblies with solidworks task scheduler (including from office up) and make them at night or lunch break.

 

[re_solidworks]

the parameterization pushed in the great assemblies is a sort of "art" to which I think you get with a lot of experience. .

100%. to sell some commercials have spread the voice that solidworks you learn in 5 days.
I say that if a user is good and follows, in 5 days he learns the commands, but before learning how to build a consistent and geometrically complex set by keeping control (and you need to do it in topdown) you don't need 5 months!
learned that is how to have learned to go cycling and if you also change cad but stay on a parametric in a short time you are well operational.

 

[sampom]

I think I understand and if that's how I say no. How can you update a set without opening it?
is precisely at the opening that swx controls and reloads together the data it has and if you find the modified parts it reconstructs.
external references, which inevitably create when "colleges" of geometries are normally resolved within a set. basically one part with a hole in another part in a set contains, instead of quotas, a type info:

"on the edge of the "a" part inside the axieme "b". This report is resolved (and possibly updated) when the "b" assist is open and the edge of the "a" part is found.
from this you understand that if the axieme is not open you will not update anything.

to "bind" parts among themselves without going through a set you have to do as I told you before, but it is a workaround and it is not the top (in my opinion).
in any case you would update the parts but not the assemblies and to have the "verified" relationships you should enable the option that uploads the documents in reference.

by returning to your question you could undo the reconstruction of the assemblies with solidworks task scheduler (including from office up) and make them at night or lunch break.

Hello
Here, it's experience as yours I was talking before (holy, it seems you know more about the devil:biggrin:. sin we are far away, you would be a very precious source. . ).

Sometimes I explain badly and apologize, but it is because I learn it away using it, and limited to my needs (I try to do everything I need, but often I don't even know how:smile... we finally managed to book/confirm the course for October (already paid for almost a year. only that then was the basis or little more, 5 days from them and 5 from us with our business problems, now I fear that much will be a little useless), always commitments allowing of course.

to be updated automatically I meant that however it keeps the information and clearly when I open it I will see the changes (or the casinos), as well as when I open the other derivative/related parts, but the change is still "effective" in the database (excuse me the improperness of the technical language) and I do not have to give particular commands to pass from the previous state to the current, I do it alone (and the bad rather is that it is that it is that it is difficult to go back).

..apart from that it seems to me that when I change a part to the closing/lifting it always tells me that there are other related parts/axis that will be rebuilt and saved too.. I'm taking fireflies for lanterns? or maybe I have particular settings in the properties (but it seems to me that it is by default installation)?

unfortunately in company they make me work to produce; If I have to get lost time to study it, do you know the races that make me do?

greetings
Mar

 

[re_solidworks]

Hello
Here, it's experience as yours I was talking before (holy, it seems you know more about the devil:biggrin:. sin we are far away, you would be a very precious source. . ).

experience comes, especially in a case like mine. I and a colleague of mine almost demanded a 3d and when we used it for the first time it was '99 and turned on a 2 350 mhz repentum. Can you imagine making big asses?
at a certain point before telling the property (which had spent money) that we had taken a crab we "engaged" and not little.
production day and night I brought home the key and experimented because despite the courses certain tricks we discovered them alone.
for the distance are not of the globe, you can see!

..apart from that it seems to me that when I change a part to the closing/lifting it always tells me that there are other related parts/axis that will be rebuilt and saved too.. I'm taking fireflies for lanterns? or maybe I have particular settings in the properties (but it seems to me that it is by default installation)?

He asks you because you have open assemblies in another window, if you had opened only the part that you are editing would not ask you.:wink:

 

[fabiofh]

Thank you all for your help

 

[michele81]

Does it seem right then to charge a 5 day course 1400 per person? to teach you to use the basic commands? and then no practical indication of how to deal effectively with the creation of assemblies.. .