• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

use 'correct' software cad 3d

  • Thread starter Thread starter ceschi1959
  • Start date Start date
I would have asked first:
  • What do you need?
  • What stress conditions will it have to endure?
  • What are the essential aesthetic requirements?
  • What are the forecasts of quantity and production times?
  • What is your budget?
 
I would have asked first:
  • What do you need?
  • What stress conditions will it have to endure?
  • What are the essential aesthetic requirements?
  • What are the forecasts of quantity and production times?
  • What is your budget?
bike transport for dogs
max 11 kg (a dobermann:smile:! joke)
to be evaluated in the execution phase with the designer and the client
50,000 pcs per year - as low as possible
top secret however high

inquire as much as possible, propose solutions, we are on the good road.

are missing, among other things, material, thickness and then more.
 
Maybe I didn't explain how I wanted to, I didn't mean that the "projectists" should do the "macchiniists" to learn how to work, only that there could be more exchange of information between the parties.
this should not be remitted to the good will of individuals, but in my opinion it should be "painted" by someone who is above.
then it is not that it is so in all the companies, but in more than one yes.
 
bike transport for dogs
max 11 kg (a dobermann:smile:! joke)
to be evaluated in the execution phase with the designer and the client
50,000 pcs per year - as low as possible
top secret however high

inquire as much as possible, propose solutions, we are on the good road.

are missing, among other things, material, thickness and then more.
production on site, or in low cost countries?

low budget means low quality, so "poor" materials, no co-printing of ergonomic details?

do you have a clear idea of the product or not?
I mean, do you need prototypes or prototype molds?
 
the information given, on your questions, is only some of those placed in the execution of the project.
for beppino: the budget was proportional to the product, I didn't say low. bass had to be molding times, the customer and the designer were in the industry and therefore they had very clear idea of the product.
the thread was aimed at a 'correct' use of computer tools, especially cad.
for the project, various aspects had to be considered, those already highlighted and others.
in particular problems of storage and packing, those which have in practice given the guidelines to the realization of the product.
while remaining the sform angle for a correct extraction of the piece, the thickness of the plastic for the 'resistance' of the detail, what is the two that influences more storage and packing? how to set the problem?
c.
 
the information given, on your questions, is only some of those placed in the execution of the project.
for beppino: the budget was proportional to the product, I didn't say low. bass had to be molding times, the customer and the designer were in the industry and therefore they had very clear idea of the product.
the thread was aimed at a 'correct' use of computer tools, especially cad.
for the project, various aspects had to be considered, those already highlighted and others.
in particular problems of storage and packing, those which have in practice given the guidelines to the realization of the product.
while remaining the sform angle for a correct extraction of the piece, the thickness of the plastic for the 'resistance' of the detail, what is the two that influences more storage and packing? how to set the problem?
c.
the molding sform does not affect particularly.
only a few degrees, because to extract the grid, external movements are necessary.
I would say that the external deform must be dictated exclusively by the storage of one piece on the other.
model the brackets for fixing to the bicycle, so that they also serve as a reference to stack the pieces.
When they are stored, they must not "plant", they must be taken freely.
 
Let's resume the speech on the detail.
in figure 1 there is the sketch of the commanded section both from the sform and from the thickness. the latter has a lesser influence but is not defined 'a priori' only with geometric considerations. increasing the thickness must increase the sform. If, absurdly, the so obtained deform becomes excessive, in the sense that the dimensions at the base diminish too (remember that there must be a dog and we can not put it in a fun!!!), we must seek other solutions. this is + or - what happened but we are already ahead with the project.
another problem to face is the realization of the surfaces once given the plant (figure 2). the surface to be obtained is seen in figure 3. How would you do that?
 

Attachments

  • 1.webp
    1.webp
    10.6 KB · Views: 17
  • 2.webp
    2.webp
    5.6 KB · Views: 13
  • 3.webp
    3.webp
    7.6 KB · Views: 16
Let's resume the speech on the detail.
in figure 1 there is the sketch of the commanded section both from the sform and from the thickness. the latter has a lesser influence but is not defined 'a priori' only with geometric considerations. increasing the thickness must increase the sform. If, absurdly, the so obtained deform becomes excessive, in the sense that the dimensions at the base diminish too (remember that there must be a dog and we can not put it in a fun!!!), we must seek other solutions. this is + or - what happened but we are already ahead with the project.
another problem to face is the realization of the surfaces once given the plant (figure 2). the surface to be obtained is seen in figure 3. How would you do that?
variable thickness?
 
Let's resume the speech on the detail.
in figure 1 there is the sketch of the commanded section both from the sform and from the thickness. the latter has a lesser influence but is not defined 'a priori' only with geometric considerations. increasing the thickness must increase the sform. If, absurdly, the so obtained deform becomes excessive, in the sense that the dimensions at the base diminish too (remember that there must be a dog and we can not put it in a fun!!!), we must seek other solutions. this is + or - what happened but we are already ahead with the project.
another problem to face is the realization of the surfaces once given the plant (figure 2). the surface to be obtained is seen in figure 3. How would you do that?
a solution is to build well the support curves or a quick swept vanbata and then with a "barbatrucco" a through curves mesh taking as sections the newly created swept...... can it be? :biggrin:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top