view problems - inventor 2017

[vale79]

Hello everyone
here is my problem today: going from one environment to another of inventor 2017 I find inconsistencies in the visualization that I can not solve even by checking and updating all the files.
I explain: attached recessed alignment_esp, you see plans that I cannot make disappear even opening all the assemblies and parts, removing visibility, saving and reopening... They disappear from all other files but not from this ipn. not all plans, only some, others with alt+ì disappear instantly.
always in this design there is a red... should be 2, as in other attachments. One's gone and I can't get her back. and opening the individual designs there is...
and finally, the two red lines are created with a swing, in the same way and with the same parameters on both pieces (which then are threaded one inside the other. Why on a piece the lie is only seen on a "face" while on the other hand passes the piece and goes out on the other?? ? ?

Unfortunately we have not installed service pack and update, can it be only question of this?
Thank you so much!! !
Hi.
That's right.

 

[TECNOMODEL]

go to see which view representation you have inserted the various parts in the presentation.
must correspond to the one on which you work in the part, keeping the adactivity you will see the changes made in part also in the assieme and in the presentation.

 

[vale79]

technomodel for president!! !
Thank you very much. Now I'm verifying the thing about representations. . .
Meanwhile I noticed something else, I write it if it can be useful to someone: the problem of the escalation that turns out different in the 2 pieces I think it is given by the fact that a piece is real, with all its work, the other (the one where the escalation passes) unfortunately is derived from a step, has lost all the work because here we are in 3 in the office and we work with 3 versions of different inventor, this had been opened with 2017 but then it served again to open it with 2016 and then pull and then it is destroyed only. . .

 

[TECNOMODEL]

are you in 3 and processed with 3 different versions?:36_1_25:

I don't even want to think about the problems that can be in such a situation.

Can I ask a question? but why this choice?

 

[vale79]

now I think we have definitively eliminated 2011 and we are in 2 with 2017 and one with 2016, but recently, and maybe... One meter from the other but trouble if the subjects know too much about what they do...
because... as usual, who does not know things, work, believes to save a few euros by not buying an update of the main software we use. If they realize the time and data we lose in this way... But no, no matter, anything in the name of 50 cents in the extra pocket today, tomorrow we don't even know if we are in the world...
my next design will be a coffin with pockets and built-in coin holder. . .

 

[vale79]

and then the organization totally non-existent. . I saw our archive (better described as "short" of drawings with improbable names). . .
from a certain point of view, however, the disorder has its own usefulness, I found an old copy (among the various scattered around) of the piece with the original processing, by chance.
but the problem of the line trap remains:-(

 

[vale79]

problem of the solved trap, even if in mile way; probably in this case is the broach that he does not like, or the fact that he has fittings; on the smooth circular part works well, on the broaching no, and what changes compared to the other similar piece is that this is all connected. That could be it. goes well, I settle for a shorter line only on the smooth circular part, rather than the traction that could generate comprehension errors in the assembly.