welded profile, bisector cut

[tanticapelli]

Hello everyone
place profile part files created by the method of welding profiles.
there are two main configurations: default that represents the monconies I carry in laser cutting with starting material 300x100x8, assembled that represents the tube once welded.
I wonder that in the welded version the cut would have to be not in bisettrice (I asked to stop the hole that is created).
I have adopted this solution that you see as with only one file I have drawn the pieces to give to laser cutting and the animated version for the weld.
Consider that this piece is actually part of a much larger project.
would there have been, in your opinion, a wise and safe method (in the sense that it did not imply the creation of dangerous copies of files that did not dialogue with each other) to ensure that the cut that separates ccr13a and ccr13b had a corner so that two profiles of different height (300 mm and 250 mm) could be combined without creating holes?

I hope I explained.

 

[re_solidworks]

Hello everyone
place profile part files created by the method of welding profiles.
there are two main configurations: default that represents the monconies I carry in laser cutting with starting material 300x100x8, assembled that represents the tube once welded.
I wonder that in the welded version the cut would have to be not in bisettrice (I asked to stop the hole that is created).
I have adopted this solution that you see as with only one file I have drawn the pieces to give to laser cutting and the animated version for the weld.
Consider that this piece is actually part of a much larger project.
would there have been, in your opinion, a wise and safe method (in the sense that it did not imply the creation of dangerous copies of files that did not dialogue with each other) to ensure that the cut that separates ccr13a and ccr13b had a corner so that two profiles of different height (300 mm and 250 mm) could be combined without creating holes?

I hope I explained.

Hello, there is no file in the zip, can you post it again?

 

[tanticapelli]

Hello, there is no file in the zip, can you post it again?

Oh, wow, sorry.

 

[tanticapelli]

here is the file, produced with version 2019 sp 5.0

 

[drake]

hi... I took a quick look at the file and I didn't understand all your procedure, but you'll surely have your reasons for doing it. I ask you why you didn't use a 250x100x8 directly to do the smaller one? However to make the cut not on the bisettrice, I would do the welded profiles without the edge treatments and then with a proper sketch on the side face of the profile I would find the appropriate cutting line and on that line I would pass a perpendicular plan to the side face of the profile. Finally with 2 short/extended I would store the profiles on that floor, with appropriate welding game.
*I open a bracket because I noticed this. on the 1 short/extended I applied 1 mm welding game and everything ok, while on the other short/extended by applying the mm of play it is on the opposite side. So to play the game on the right side I did a move face.
I don't send you back the file, but an image of the recultated and however it was clear.

 

[tanticapelli]

hi... I took a quick look at the file and I didn't understand all your procedure, but you'll surely have your reasons for doing it. I ask you why you didn't use a 250x100x8 directly to do the smaller one? However to make the cut not on the bisettrice, I would do the welded profiles without the edge treatments and then with a proper sketch on the side face of the profile I would find the appropriate cutting line and on that line I would pass a perpendicular plan to the side face of the profile. Finally with 2 short/extended I would store the profiles on that floor, with appropriate welding game.
*I open a bracket because I noticed this. on the 1 short/extended I applied 1 mm welding game and everything ok, while on the other short/extended by applying the mm of play it is on the opposite side. So to play the game on the right side I did a move face.
I don't send you back the file, but an image of the recultated and however it was clear.

thanks for the drake answer, the speech of the type of profile used comes from design and decision-making challenges that save you.. .
I'm curious to see the image you talked about (I don't see it).
I believe I have understood your procedure as soon as I have time I will try to apply it.
Thank you.

 

[drake]

azz... it's true...

 

[re_solidworks]

Hello everyone
place profile part files created by the method of welding profiles.
there are two main configurations: default that represents the monconies I carry in laser cutting with starting material 300x100x8, assembled that represents the tube once welded.
I wonder that in the welded version the cut would have to be not in bisettrice (I asked to stop the hole that is created).
I have adopted this solution that you see as with only one file I have drawn the pieces to give to laser cutting and the animated version for the weld.
Consider that this piece is actually part of a much larger project.
would there have been, in your opinion, a wise and safe method (in the sense that it did not imply the creation of dangerous copies of files that did not dialogue with each other) to ensure that the cut that separates ccr13a and ccr13b had a corner so that two profiles of different height (300 mm and 250 mm) could be combined without creating holes?

I hope I explained.

I say mine, but I don't know what it takes, where the component is, etc... aesthetically it is ugly, the one proposed by drake seems made purposely, the original knows more than "fill". other thing, which I learned with experience, I leave no verbal indications: I refer to the closure of the tube, in my opinion you should have drawn it and so the truth was not tractable. in my opinion the drake solution is more easily shaped with a traditional set that with a welded, but can be done in both systems. In your case there is also a difference in height in the back area, it was necessary to offset a little bit the cut in degrees to compensate.