welded shaped as a whole

[Mario SJPD]

Good morning.
I am meeting companies that to perform welded carpenters prefer to use a set with each single cut modeled as part.
At this moment I am collaborating with a small but organized company that works in this way every \body cut a codified part and with its own table, also a 80x80x3 tube along 1 meter straight cut without holes in it has its table and its code.
I personally find it absurd I am used to using the multi body but maybe I stayed behind and in case I abide, I would like your opinion.
Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

every company has its own organization of work. making a table for each component is not wrong, indeed it facilitates the work of carpentry, because those who have to prepare the material to be soldered can do it independently from the final welded and even you can divide the material by supplier (tubes to one, plates to another... )
I think that I work a weld in the environment together a complication considering the tools available to the environment part as a separate cut and structural elements; certainly has limits as it has been seen in the recent discussion of @deep70 on binding to the cartilage the properties of the separate cut. in addition to the ability to manage more easily, through configurations, a model in pre and post processing version.
if you want to have the individual bodies managed as a file it is also possible to work in environment part multibody.

 

[Mario SJPD]

Thank you. I'll go see the discussion you mentioned.
I think it exactly like you, but I would still like to have a testimony even statistically of the phenomenon, so if someone works like this or has to deal with companies that work so beat a hit.

 

[re_solidworks]

Good morning.
I am meeting companies that to perform welded carpenters prefer to use a set with each single cut modeled as part.
At this moment I am collaborating with a small but organized company that works in this way every \body cut a codified part and with its own table, also a 80x80x3 tube along 1 meter straight cut without holes in it has its table and its code.
I personally find it absurd I am used to using the multi body but maybe I stayed behind and in case I abide, I would like your opinion.
Thank you.

in order to understand the reasons for this choice, we should fall into the company reality. sometimes it is due to the connection with the management (which could be radiated) sometimes habit. remains the fact that, if you want the boards of all components and you want a code for each component, it is better to go together and let the welds lose. welded are comfortable when the information contained in separate welded elements (material, length and cut angles) is sufficient to produce the particular. in case of large assemblies welded are not simplifiable geometrically, with assemblies it is easier to simplify in various ways...

 

[Studio Metal]

Thank you. I'll go see the discussion you mentioned.
I think it exactly like you, but I would still like to have a testimony even statistically of the phenomenon, so if someone works like this or has to deal with companies that work so beat a hit.

Good morning bass band, I work this way. I draw the welded as assemblies. this because the way of working carpenters has changed over the last 5/6 years. All now cut both plates and laser profiles, so they need a complete set of the axieme. a piece can be used in multiple welded assemblies, so they don't do anything about quantity "singles", but they need to have total quantities. I hope I'm explained! !

 

[sampom]

In fact "it would be better" to treat welded individually and then mount them together. especially if there are many; multibody parts files, with many bodies, become very heavy and sw slows down a lot. not so much if they are only structures/frames composed exclusively of "structural members"; in this case, however, the file is smooth and fast in processing. but if in addition to the tubular/profilati are added extrusion plates, revolutions from turnstile and folded plates, with many instances, then it weighs quite the whole. true that it is very convenient and fast to work in one environment, in one file, but you do not have to abuse it and do it by method. Moreover, we are used so, but not all cads have the multibody environment, indeed, probably only solidworks (at least until a few years ago). for many designers is an unknown function. ... clear that if the need is to manage every detail as a single file, the axieme is mandatory.