wrong sheet metal development

[Esselle]

Good morning I ask for help with a problem that I cannot solve in any way.

I have this particular which is a carter made up of 2 welded sheets among themselves.
the side part is this:
and my solid returns to me this development which is clearly wrong:
I sent the step file to another user and the development that returns to him, after making the appropriate conversions is this:
that is right, but the thing that leaves me perplexed is that obviously he did it from what I sent.

Do you have suggestions to understand where I'm wrong?

I attach the solid files and the step for those who want to look at them.

Thank you.
View attachment Carter.zip

 

[pritio72]

effectively using the "flat repetition" command does wrong development (I don't know why).
instead using the "distend" function the development is correct (at least in appearance) as photo of the monitor.
try using that function and check if you have it.
Maybe try to feel assistance and see what they tell you

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

go to change function of flat repetition and remove the tick to simplify piegature

 

[Esselle]

thanks for your interest.

the solution of massivonweizen solves the problem, in the sense that the flat repetition is correct.

At this point the question arises: always check that this function has not come out? is it possible to set the template so that it has not always appeared?

What better to do?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

is it possible to set the template so that it has not always appeared?

http://help.solidworks.com/2014/ita...hidd_options_sheetmetal_dpp.htm?verredirect=1

 

[Esselle]

So apart from the dumb-ass you made me posting the link (you're an indispensable resource for this forum), the answer is that it's better that it's always set, right?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

It is better to be always sected, just

I have no idea. if there is the possibility of choice a reason there will be; I can deter the hypothesis that it is useful when you have PCs with basic performance or complicated sheets that require big calculation efforts and therefore have simplified folds make the work more fluid (in fact in the guide speaks of complex edges), but you remain in the field of hypotheses

 

[Esselle]

Okay, thanks again!