Fulvio Romano
Guest
...you want because a young engineer, even if good, costs less than a good technician...
Apprendista
Guest
Thanks so much to you. I'm going out a little crazy in the middle of the quotas to define the thicknesses, but I think it's necessary:as would be <What do I see? > (ahi ahi, we start badly..:tongue.
see exactly what you see in the asymmetric you posted. only that the cut will be complete throughout half of the piece (not only dissected for a quarter as the attachment) and clearly the lower part will be speculating to the top since it is a solid revolution.
Come on, I'll give you a hand (someone will cripple me, but at least start with something):View attachment 11526I think there's nothing complicated, just like it's inside.
now you will have the obligation to quote it correctly and post the result obtained
However, yes, you just have to study and learn how to "read" the drawings and then immediately recognize the details (I think you'll attend a course, no?).
autocad is a 2d, so the sections you have to draw them anyway, and just for this (but not only, for me who are of the "old school") I think that knowing how to draw "hand" would be a great thing (now you unleash flames:tongue
greetings
Marco:smile:
At least I'm trying to bang our head a little...
stefanobruno
Guest
When I started working at U.T., in 1982 in michelin, there was a person to check the drawing invoice.
if a turned piece you could have represented drawing only 1/4, so you had to do, trouble drawing it in half or, horror, whole.
it was drawn at table on a0, with the shortness of not making details in smaller boxes of 10x10 cm, all to save paper and time.
Bye.
Apprendista
Guest
In fact, it seems to me that the prof was talking about semi-sighted-signing. . .
for me it is also a goal to have managed to do it in normal section. . . by employing about two hours I managed to reproduce it by interpreting the quotas...in fact it is symmetrical, so it would be enough also the goal perhaps to make the piece understand...
However, I am happy to have discovered this forum, at least even those who are not really hard on the subject can try to learn something by comparing with those who know a little more...
for me it is also a goal to have managed to do it in normal section. . . by employing about two hours I managed to reproduce it by interpreting the quotas...in fact it is symmetrical, so it would be enough also the goal perhaps to make the piece understand...
However, I am happy to have discovered this forum, at least even those who are not really hard on the subject can try to learn something by comparing with those who know a little more...
sampom
Guest
That's great. .
then we do not wipe and place your table:biggrin:
greetings
Marco:smile:
sampom
Guest
Apprendista
Guest
eh I have to finish sampling and insert the quotas...the table however was composed of two pieces, the first by going back and helping me I managed to do it in section... tomorrow I will try to post the table with these two pieces quoted, the other piece the allego. However regarding the bevels to 45 degrees to do, to what height should be done?
Attachments
sampom
Guest
That which places now is even simpler than the other, less quotas to be allocated.
What do you mean, sorry? ?
I think I remember that they were 2x45° bevels. as would be <to which height should be made?
I put them in the image I had attached, I am on a edge (clearly).. a 2mm "imaginary" triangle that cuts that edge.
greetings
Mar
p.s. but at the end with what "strument" are you drawing it?
Apprendista
Guest
I am using pencil and team on millimeter sheet:smile:That which places now is even simpler than the other, less quotas to be allocated.
What do you mean, sorry? ?
I think I remember that they were 2x45° bevels. as would be <to which height should be made?
I put them in the image I had attached, I am on a edge (clearly).. a 2mm "imaginary" triangle that cuts that edge.
greetings
Mar
p.s. but at the end with what "strument" are you drawing it?
However it will seem strange to you, but my ignorance in drawing is such that I never made bevels at 45 degrees, basically 2 mm is the hypotenuse of the rectangle triangle?
ps: but in "2 x 45 degrees", the "2" indicates the length of the segment that goes to make the bevel?
think you, I knew it... well I have a lot to learn:tongue:sampom
Guest
ossignur.. !However it will seem strange to you, but my ignorance in drawing is such that I never made bevels at 45 degrees, basically 2 mm is the hypotenuse of the rectangle triangle?
ps: but in "2 x 45 degrees", the "2" indicates the length of the segment that goes to make the bevel?
But no, I said the side. would be the "catetes" (in your case is the edge of a cone trunk so it is not a real rectangle triangle) that measure 2mm. :
do you still have any text/manual drawing?the prof give you exercises so to your knees assuming that you know how to do them?
Okay, let's do this (but you didn't use autocad? with that you would do it in 10 minutes) and in luck... and wait for your drawings. .
greetings
Marco:smile:
When would you have the exam?
Apprendista
Guest
the draft text I will see to buy it as soon as possible, the exam I think is in December/January. . .we have to do first 12 exercises, we are to the fifth, these two pieces were of the fourth... but I stayed a little back, I still have to finish the second and start the third, after I will ask you some straight on that if possible:tongue:ossignur.. !
But no, I said the side. would be the "catetes" (in your case is the edge of a cone trunk so it is not a real rectangle triangle) that measure 2mm. :View attachment 11554do you still have any text/manual drawing?
the prof give you exercises so to your knees assuming that you know how to do them?
Okay, let's do this (but you didn't use autocad? with that you would do it in 10 minutes) and in luck... and wait for your drawings. .
greetings
Marco:smile:
When would you have the exam?
Thanks again, bye.
sampom
Guest
I highly recommend taking this too:http://www.hoepli.it/libro/vademecum-per-disegnatori-tecnici.asp?ib=9788820329563#is "everytime" if not the bible, at least a practical breviary for the designer. And you'll always need it, you'll have it all your life on your desk.
Oh, yes.
You're gonna have to give it to us.
greetings
Mar
Fulvio Romano
Guest
attention... in the drawing there are redundant odds and even badly quoted...the bastards do it in mail to see if you fall. I feel like the same exercises as when I did the exam... but who's your professor? But I studied in napoli with a goat.
Anyway
1) the quota "80" is redundant, it should not be put, but if you want to put it, it must go in parentheses, because it is not a constructive quota
2) if there are no welding, is the piece made of lathe? in this case the quotas must be fanned (like the first post) and not in succession. this to facilitate the operator of the lathe that you will find to give the distance from the spindle.
Apprendista
Guest
thanks for the recommended book. Yes, I have a lot to do, also because I don't only have drawing to do, but also the two of chemistry and the very famous and temutissimo analysis1.. .
Excuse me sampom, before entering the quotas on the table, I would like to put them on what you did to show you if they are okay... you with what you made the section? What program can I use to insert quotas?
Fulvio Romano
Guest
...a cover!
Apprendista
Guest
I don't know what technological process has been achieved, we haven't been told...however my prof is hope... .
Apprendista
Guest
almost...thank you for understanding:tongue:
sampom
Guest
I did it with solidworks, but then that attachment as you will see is saved in .jpg (as a photo).
without getting to a photo editing you can also use paint or similar.
greetings
Mar
Fulvio Romano
Guest
Maddai.. Don't do the job twice!
Do you have a scanner? scan the drawing and post the image, or take a photo with a digital machine. even if you see badly/deformed, we understand the same!
Do you have a scanner? scan the drawing and post the image, or take a photo with a digital machine. even if you see badly/deformed, we understand the same!
Apprendista
Guest
No, no, I just wanted to put the odds on that he did.Maddai.. Don't do the job twice!
Do you have a scanner? scan the drawing and post the image, or take a photo with a digital machine. even if you see badly/deformed, we understand the same!