• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

eurofighter vs f35

  • Thread starter Thread starter RS4
  • Start date Start date

RS4

Guest
scheda tecnica eurofighter 2000wingspan:10.95m
height:5.8m
length: 15.96m
wing surface:50m(q)
performance:
speed max:2 mach
takeoff / landing:500m
autonomy:3.200km(transfer)
range of action: over 1350km
propulsive system:
two Eurojet ej200 turbofans from 60kn(13.490 lb) dry 90 kn(20.000 lb) with post-burner
weapons
up to 6,500 kg of external loads (air-driven missiles radar and ir, tanks, etc.) a 27mm mauser cannon.
crew:
1-2 pilots
description:
is an aerial superiority hunt, ideal for air-air combat, can supply itself in flight, also performs ground attack missions, has a new generation radar and armament, has a very sophisticated avionic, including color multifunction screens, helmet with display, passive infrared search sensor, voice commands and self-protection equipment. the eurofighter typhoon, will change our aeronautics, and the way to carry out the aerial missions, these arei will mark the radical change of our and other aircraft. the a.m.(military air force)conta of having maximum 121, including a two-seater series of operational conversion. will carry a warload that includes: 13 external stations, 5 under the fuselage (of which an opzinal for the wet), and an optional "bagnata under the semial.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Technical specifications f35f-35a is a monomotor hunt, whose plant closely resembles that of the f-22.
the wing is high, with truncated delta plant, the air vents are two, sideways, the tail paddles are made up of two vertical stabilizers and two horizontal timones that are exhibiting considerably compared to the nozzle of the turbofan.
two internal holds on the sides of the fuselage allow to carry a significant armament (2 amraam missiles and 2 1,000 kg bombs) preserving the stealth characteristics.
the internal gun is a 25 mm Gauge-22/a.

version b (stovl) has a fuselage fan for sustenance, which acts in concert with the exhaust nozzle of the engine that can be rotated down to 110 degrees.
the presence of the sustenance system forced to renounce the internal cannon, which can be mounted in a central stealth design pod, as well as to limit the capacity of the internal holds (which are compatible with 500 kg devices and not by 1,000 kg). also the internal capacity of fuel is reduced compared to version a.

the shipped version has a larger wing surface, and the semials are foldable.
the fuel reserve is greater than version a, but also in this case the internal cannon was sacrificed in favor of the central external pod.

f-35 stealth features are very pushy. but not reaching those of the f-22, we talk of values less than 0.01 square meters. (by comparison a “normal” hunt like mig-29 or f-16 has a rcs in the order of 5 square meters).

for the drive is expected the possibility to choose indifferently between the p&w engine f135 and the ge/rolls-royce engine f136, but at the moment only the f135 has an insured future and will equip the first specimens, while the development of the engine f136, wanted mainly from the English, risks being erased.
In fact it makes little sense (and it is very expensive) to develop two practically equivalent turbofans, but the English do not intend to give up a motor in which the English industry is strongly involved.

the avionic of f-35 is extremely advanced, and uses a radar with aesa technology derived from that of the f-22.
the newest, however, is the application of the concept of “sensor fusion”.
in practice a series of cameras placed at various points of the plane, allows the pilot to see in every direction, as if the fuselage “did not exist”.
the images of the cameras are "fuse" along with those of the other sensors, such as radar, the irst, esm etc... providing the pilot with a complete awareness of the outside environment.

“sensor fusion” technology will be progressively implemented in the various manufacturing blocks.
partnership f35the f-35 is the least expensive and less performing sibling of the f-22 raptor (the hunting intended to replace the f-15 as a fighter from aerial superiority). Despite this is a fifth-generation hunting with stealth capabilities, it is designed for cas missions (close-air-support, close air support), tactical bombing and of course is able to use stand-off weapons (i.e. able to hit targets beyond the scope of engagement of the opposing defenses), and from aerial superiority (...beh for that we have the efa typhoon....). there are 3 different versions for this plane:

the f-35a is the version that I would dare to define standard with conventional take-off and landing

the f-35b version stovl (short take off and vertical landing) version with short takeoff and vertical landing perfect for v/stol aircraft carriers like our invincible class British cabling.

the f-35c is the version (still in the evaluation to tell the truth) that should replace the older f/a-18 hornet versions on conventional aircraft carriers.

Also interesting is the part of the international participation in this project, the United States are the leaders of the project followed by the great brine that is the only or partner of "level 1", with a contribution of 2,5 billion dollars, equal to 10% of the development costs. "level 2" partners are Italy, which contributes with $1 billion and low countries with a contribution of $800 million. The parners of "level 3" are Canada (440 million dollars), Turkia (175 million dollars), Australian (144 million dollars), Norwegian (122 million dollars) and Denmark (110 million dollars). israele and singapore participate in the program as "security cooperative participants".

Hi.

 

Attachments

  • eurofighter3.webp
    eurofighter3.webp
    8.3 KB · Views: 87
  • AIR_F-35B.webp
    AIR_F-35B.webp
    29.4 KB · Views: 89
scheda tecnica eurofighter 2000...13External stations, 5 under the fuselage (of which an opzinal for wet), and an optional "bagnata under the semial... .
the "bagnata" crucis street?!? ! ! ?

There's no religion anymore!
:smile:
 
Hello

President

here is the via crucis:biggrin::biggrin::finger:
This photo testifies to the beginning of the end of a good project, born badly, managed worse and finished in "caciara".
We deserve Greek.
:mad:
 
er President

Why do you say that?

Thank you.
And how not!
You know, I've got my job to go against it.

I don't know where to start.. The tail can be a starting point.

the eurofighter was born to be the "agile" brother of the return, the other "monument" wanted by the English when the iron lady cut the funds and found no better than to make them spend to Europeans.

just out of the drawing tables it was noticed that the buccaneer had found his heir, but that the mrca (multi role fighter aircraft) was all less than a "multi" something, indeed it was a very expensive specialist capable of doing one thing only, English, that is, the strike (a deep attack in the enemy territory at low altitude and possibly nuclear).
 
then started "subito" (we are talking about 1972-3) with the version from "combatmento" derived from the tornado.
probably the word "derivata" was misinterpreted (English was still an destroyed language) and decided to use the "derive" of the tornado to prove its "derivation".
the most advanced aircraft project (in 1970) and "rapidamente" was created the prototype.
in 1993 (read well one thousand nine hundred ninety-ninety, exactly 20 years later) the eurofighter will fly.
 
And how not!
You know, I've got my job to go against it.

I don't know where to start.. The tail can be a starting point.

the eurofighter was born to be the "agile" brother of the return, the other "monument" wanted by the English when the iron lady cut the funds and found no better than to make them spend to Europeans.

just out of the drawing tables it was noticed that the buccaneer had found his heir, but that the mrca (multi role fighter aircraft) was all less than a "multi" something, indeed it was a very expensive specialist capable of doing one thing only, English, that is, the strike (a deep attack in the enemy territory at low altitude and possibly nuclear).
How can you say something like that excuse? ?

What do you think is the most technological hunt in circulation today? ?
 
I speak of material performance used

I ask you.................. since you say that
The tornado had to be a "multirole", and for this purpose it was designed.
on the paper was to solve in a single plane the whole spectrum of the needs of a military aviation.
without envelope limits, therefore wing with variable geometry, two-seater, bimotor with advanced radar and avionics.
Then, in the hands of the British, who was interested only to find the alias of their beautiful tsr 2 they overwhelmed him by becoming a simple bomber, but expensive as a space shuttle.
Of course it's multi-role though, it can attack a railroad car like a ship. sin that its version from "caccia" (because you have to decide first if to buy the aids or adv) exceeded every record for cost/effectiveness ratio (in the sense that the cost per hour of flight could suffice for 10 f-16) and the only flying thing that could "cacciare" was the tu-95 (see case, operating in the north sea).
spend a mass of money on such a specialized and expensive plane, cut our legs for 20 years and now we find ourselves with a technological miracle that has been updated with a cpu intel 386 and that loads flight missions with the "tape", but the "memory" is from 128k against the original 64! ! !
then spending another display we can have digital displays (and retire the "mobile maps") and an integrated weapon system.
On the contrary, they decided to put it on the eurofighter (when they found that if you mention the tornado in international missions, they all run smoothly) (excluding the English).
:smile:
 
but let's go back to our.
in the 1970s the reference was the viggen and, rightly, if you wanted to "fight" you had to copy the best.
At that time, the invisibility was for superhero comics and the F-15 was still under construction, but the eurofighter would have dictated law for at least 20 years.
no one could have tried to "stringe" like him in a pirate and in the "dogfight" there would have been no story.
the F-16 would have had bread for its agguerriti teeth.
However, in 1993, the F-16 was already good for retirement, and after an honored career he started an honorable career as a technological "portbombe".
the eurofighter begins to fly when the F-22 enters the drawing tables and enters service at two years one from the other, in 2003 the efa and in 2005 the raptor.
Now even a blind man might see that 20 years of design are not invisible.
 
but let's go back to our.
in the 1970s the reference was the viggen and, rightly, if you wanted to "fight" you had to copy the best.
At that time, the invisibility was for superhero comics and the F-15 was still under construction, but the eurofighter would have dictated law for at least 20 years.
no one could have tried to "stringe" like him in a pirate and in the "dogfight" there would have been no story.
the F-16 would have had bread for its agguerriti teeth.
However, in 1993, the F-16 was already good for retirement, and after an honored career he started an honorable career as a technological "portbombe".
the eurofighter begins to fly when the F-22 enters the drawing tables and enters service at two years one from the other, in 2003 the efa and in 2005 the raptor.
Now even a blind man might see that 20 years of design are not invisible.
I do not fully agree with you er president cmq

instead of telling me about the new f35 joint fighter
 
After an exalting start and years of rethinking the French got tired and in 86 they fly their rafale, a small hunting with secondary capable of attacking the ground.
Why divorce? simple the French had no tornado and they were looking for a replacement for jaguar and eetendard, so it served a "multiporpouse" plane small and light enough to land on the delicate bridges of the foch.
the eurofighter was instead voted for uncompromising air superiority and the French claimed to bend the pure blood noble to ungrateful tasks such as ploughing the enemy's ground.
told and made the rafale flies in 86 with American engines while the eurofighter 10 years later debuts with the rb199 because the English still had some "problems" with the ej.
with healthy acumen the French chose the egg and left the chicken to starve to European hautes.
 
After an exalting start and years of rethinking the French got tired and in 86 they fly their rafale, a small hunting with secondary capable of attacking the ground.
Why divorce? simple the French had no tornado and they were looking for a replacement for jaguar and eetendard, so it served a "multiporpouse" plane small and light enough to land on the delicate bridges of the foch.
the eurofighter was instead voted for uncompromising air superiority and the French claimed to bend the pure blood noble to ungrateful tasks such as ploughing the enemy's ground.
told and made the rafale flies in 86 with American engines while the eurofighter 10 years later debuts with the rb199 because the English still had some "problems" with the ej.
with healthy acumen the French chose the egg and left the chicken to starve to European hautes.
It's always risky to tease er president. . .
 
now after another 10 years what do we find?
surprise the eurofighter ex efa suddenly becomes multi-role!
you start to the chetichella, three or four years ago you start talking about an upgrade package that should "improve" the ability to navigation and attack every time, hmm then begin to propinate information about dry and "bagnati" attacks under the wings, and in the end here it's nice that packaged the "monster", the attack efa to the ground.
apart from the figure at plenetari levels, 10 years later (and disdaining European budgets) what could be done and did the French, who had seen us right, here I am.
but above all the efa you have to have the brain filled with sawing to see it as a multi-role, why?
the rafale, like any "bomb" since they invented the a-7, has high or at least medium wings. do not design low wing ground attack planes from phantom time (peace to his soul).
moral today we find a missing dogfighter (the white hair came in "garage") shot for an unlikely ground attack plane, to say little puerile, why?
because the tornado has finished its "race" and has decided to transfer its "suite" (the new one) on the only flying object identified in Europe, the eurofighter, and to be able to bury in the deepest hole that other amx scandal.
Desperation works miracles, but at this turn the miracle came out "slow".
poor eurofighter, not because of him, was born old and just out of the garage underwent the care of the f-104, arrived in Europe as a "bombardiere".
shame has no limits and put a maverich under the wings of the eurofighter, as well as uncomfortable, is an insult to human reason.
then we go to watch the eurofighter.
 
it was 1974, the other yesterday, flying a basket of planes that lost the race of the century against the f-16 (best markketting).
Let's look at him.
 

Attachments

  • Northrop_YF-17_Cobra_060810-F-1234S-033.webp
    Northrop_YF-17_Cobra_060810-F-1234S-033.webp
    25.8 KB · Views: 33

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top