Exatem
Guest
I'm going back to the office tomorrow morning and we're going back to the right tracks:wink:
SHIREN
Guest
Hi.
I think there are no probes
Indeed... .
if one reads the posts
and search through the "pieghe"
to tell the jokes
Maybe I realized that the prob.ahh goat...
It's real
I can only quote "the president" who emphasizes that within the sw
had to be transferred hacapa
Good evening
Thank you very much
MBT
Guest
If they did, they would have realized this...http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/trasferimento_della_menteI do not exclude that it has already been done and not made known....
:redface:cacciatorino
Guest
but that was also transferred to the tecnigraph....
Still a point designed with software seems better than a 128 designed on paper, or not?
MBT
Guest
Right, but there's to say that it's been 25 years and production methods, quality standards, how to see cars and live them. . .
so much to make an example, in '69, when it was presented the 128, the air conditioner was an option present only on the superluxed berlines. today you find it on the profits
cacciatorino
Guest
It was just an engraved one: Because he insists that whoever uses the software can't use the brain, he's just saying it's not. otherwise the current products would be worse than the ancient ones, but obviously not.Right, but there's to say that it's been 25 years and production methods, quality standards, how to see cars and live them. . .
so much to make an example, in '69, when it was presented the 128, the air conditioner was an option present only on the superluxed berlines. today you find it on the profits
Fulvio Romano
Guest
I am more than convinced that incompetence has maintained the same average over the years, with the difference that an incompetent in front of the tecnigraph immediately releases it, one in front of the software is more difficult, because it is dazzled by the brilluccichii.
from this stems the false belief that software extinguishes the brain. It is not so, indeed, a brain in front of a software can much more than the same brain in front of the tecnigraph.
It's the decency threshold that lowered. certain shoemakers in front of the tecnigraph would not have managed to hold the pencil in hand, today they are salaried with the undeserved qualification of "projectist". the complication (the technical term is correct, and the meaning is different from complexity and/or complication) of the projects is such that the "genius" of once that, pencil in hand, planned independently, must necessarily yield the witness to a team. and the team must not necessarily have an average quality equal to that of the "genius", as long as it puts the work force, just that in front of the tecnigraph could not come out. the important thing is that the team is coordinated by someone who, in addition to the characteristics of the "genius" mentioned above, also has attitudes to team work and coordination.
I hope I have clarified once and for all what has changed, and this is not my personal point of view. Sorry about the arrogance.
MBT
Guest
Yeah, sure.
It would be nice to understand how the sw have improved or worsened the design of objects.
Unfortunately it is impossible, there are too many things that affect design
Tequila
Guest
from my point of view the "technologgggia", and therefore the various sw, has greatly improved the design of the "objects", only that sometimes (and lately also often) who declares to know how to use these software, knows how to use you and no a 10-15% of the potential, what even more serious is that they do not know how to exploit them in the context in which they work or worse still there are those who believe that know how to pajare 2 keys to make a cube.
Today we can do things that 30 years ago we didn't even dream of them, something that unfortunately I noticed is that in recent years a huge slice of excellent brains is committed to developing technology to allow me only to post pictures of my cat on feissbouk, instead of exploiting it for more important things.
time ago he turned a photo (if I find the place) where there was written coarse that with 64kb 40 years ago the man went on the moon, and today with 4gb he placed his photo on feissbouk.
Today we can do things that 30 years ago we didn't even dream of them, something that unfortunately I noticed is that in recent years a huge slice of excellent brains is committed to developing technology to allow me only to post pictures of my cat on feissbouk, instead of exploiting it for more important things.
time ago he turned a photo (if I find the place) where there was written coarse that with 64kb 40 years ago the man went on the moon, and today with 4gb he placed his photo on feissbouk.
Exatem
Guest
Hello, Enzo.
on the documentation that I have in the office, the chain must be caliber 30 or 32 and in such case the number of footprints is 6. on the size is allowed a tolerance +1.5% and -1%.
the profile and dimensions of the footprint wheels, correspond to the gauges of the chains with a seamless knit., of the type unv 5851.
the diameter of ingration, which enters the calculation of the torque, corresponds to the circumference on which the tension of the chain is exercised. it is determined by the formula (which I attach you) where d is the caliber of the chain, p is the step of the chain and n It's the fingerprint number.
I also attach a drawing that I quickly made about the barbotin for chain caliber 32 from which you can draw some size.
If you need more, let me know.
Bye.
on the documentation that I have in the office, the chain must be caliber 30 or 32 and in such case the number of footprints is 6. on the size is allowed a tolerance +1.5% and -1%.
the profile and dimensions of the footprint wheels, correspond to the gauges of the chains with a seamless knit., of the type unv 5851.
the diameter of ingration, which enters the calculation of the torque, corresponds to the circumference on which the tension of the chain is exercised. it is determined by the formula (which I attach you) where d is the caliber of the chain, p is the step of the chain and n It's the fingerprint number.
I also attach a drawing that I quickly made about the barbotin for chain caliber 32 from which you can draw some size.
If you need more, let me know.
Bye.
Attachments
SHIREN
Guest
Hello exa............
It's useless to tell you that I have a clear moment now
And I can't thank you
in the possible
you could explain the difference between the various calibers and the relationship between them and the fingerprint number
in practice
because with 30-32 caliber there are 6 fingerprints
and with caliber 31 they seek 5
You're a big exa
Thank you very much
Exatem
Guest
today I had a little more time and I went to look for some more info on manuals. That's what I found.
anchorages are filled through a winch that includes a motor (usually electric) coupled by a clutch with a fingerprint wheel (barbotin). the fingerprint wheel, crazy on the axis, can be made solid by means of clutch. generally a sapancore winch consists of the reel, consisting of a axis supported by three bearings supported by a cosy, 2 footprint wheels, 1 or more reduction pairs, 1 zambone that imprints movement to the winch, 1 chestnut to prevent the anchor's weight from turning the barbotin in the opposite direction and two bells for force maneuvers.
talking about the barbotin, the number of prints varies from 5 to 8; the speed is calculated on the dense cylinder of the radius chain winding r, while the working range takes on r.
the tracing of the barbotin is made as indicated in the boards, assuming the caliber a of the chain, b the outer length, b1 the inner length, c the outer width of the chain mesh, n the number of footprints, is determined by the two formulas attached to the image.
diameter 7.15a; 1,18a gorge; 4,5a wide gorge; 2a radius; 15a wheel outer diameter; 13.7a external diameter.
by knitting caliber means the nominal diameter of the section of each mesh. by chain gauge means the gauge of the common mesh that are part of the unit length.
the 31 caliber chain does not exist. the standard calibers are ...28,5 - 30 - 32 - 33- 35....the reference standard is the unv 5850.1
for more info, I'm here...
Hello big shi.
Attachments
maxopus
Guest
which assault squadrons, other than the sturmtruppen
Exatem
Guest
You should change avatar.which assault squadrons, other than the sturmtruppen
I recommend one of these
maximum meridium tenth perturbator:biggrin:
Attachments
SHIREN
Guest
you're so great! ! ! ! ! ! !
Hello exa
It's all post
also the caliber has changed and passed to 30
I have to evaluate the layout for the model
I'll let you know in the next few days
It's useless to say
who are "red" with your person
Thank you very much
a hug
SHIREN
Guest
Max! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !which assault squadrons, other than the sturmtruppen
You see it's like I say
we have to invent something even on paper
we have users with "service"
framework and squadron
Is that enough of good will?
a hug to you too
Exatem
Guest
All right, shiren.
You're not in red, indeed.
It's a pleasure to have been helpful and if you need more... Call!
Bye.
Er Presidente
Guest
radio
Guest
I found on an old manual (new editions no longer report them) of the extracts of norms that integrate exa's info, hope they can be useful.
Bye.
Bye.