preben
Guest
Good day, someone knows the version program revit lt ? Would I like to understand what was "already"? .... there are some basic commands to me... .
Thank you.
Thank you.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
revit versione lt
- Thread starter preben
- Start date
-
- Tags
- revit lt
3DeOltre
Guest
the "things" that does not:
workset: project sharing among more users
rendering: rendering engine is not present locally, you use cloud rendering service (autodesk 360)
conceptual masses and masses
local components, i’model-in-place’’
energy analysis/structural analysis
loading third-party applications; is closed as autocad lt
cloud management of points
Axioms
♪
workset: project sharing among more users
rendering: rendering engine is not present locally, you use cloud rendering service (autodesk 360)
conceptual masses and masses
local components, i’model-in-place’’
energy analysis/structural analysis
loading third-party applications; is closed as autocad lt
cloud management of points
Axioms
♪
preben
Guest
Is that right, but going into detail, like "travel system"?... "decalcomania"? as I use it seems too "light"!!!! I hope I'm wrong!the "things" that does not:
workset: project sharing among more users
rendering: rendering engine is not present locally, you use cloud rendering service (autodesk 360)
conceptual masses and masses
local components, i’model-in-place’’
energy analysis/structural analysis
loading third-party applications; is closed as autocad lt
cloud management of points
Axioms
♪
Tristan
Guest
What do you expect? It costs less than a third of the full version, to me it seems little light instead! and anyway lt is not for "light" but it is the acronym of limited technology.as I use it seems too "light"!!!! I hope I'm wrong!
preben
Guest
I meant light for my wallet ... However I confirm that the beam system is not there............... is there any proposal for structural tiles? ? ?
3DeOltre
Guest
the differences there are, the price difference between the two versions, must be "justified" by the difference of content that on the one hand translates into "macro-contained" or renderin, workset, model-in-place etc, on the other in individual features and/or automatisms like the beam system. There are also others in detail on this page http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/compare/index?siteid=123112&id=20336963for structural tiles, I imagine you refer to the shaving to fill a roof with an object that simulates the tiles is and remains an escamotage... I don't think there is a solution. if not the manual insertion of the beam / tile.
preben
Guest
That's right! but to explain better: I think the difference between the two versions is very comprehensible, but removing individual features gives me the idea of "moving" some commands. (to make the idea is as if with the rvt lt I could not do the copy command with multiples..... did I make the idea? )the differences there are, the price difference between the two versions, must be "justified" by the difference of content that on the one hand translates into "macro-contained" or renderin, workset, model-in-place etc, on the other in individual features and/or automatisms like the beam system. There are also others in detail on this page http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/pc/compare/index?siteid=123112&id=20336963for structural tiles, I imagine you refer to the shaving to fill a roof with an object that simulates the tiles is and remains an escamotage... I don't think there is a solution. if not the manual insertion of the beam / tile.
Alfredo Medina
Guest
for me, it's very clear. if you pay less, you receive less. If you want more, you pay more. so simple.
3DeOltre
Guest
how not to share it!!! I'm weird-straight.for me, it's very clear. if you pay less, you receive less. If you want more, you pay more. so simple.
I can add that for work, I use daily revit, both the lt version and the full version.
My judgment on the lt version is more than positive, I think it is a great solution, which is addressed to those who may normally work with autocad lt. the cost is low and what you need is, it is designed in 3d, with parametric elements and in bim environment. as evolution from the line-arch-circle... I'd say it's not cheap. disquisire on the command that is missing is talking about goat wool
preben
Guest
Does anyone know if he comes out this year?
3DeOltre
Guest
I think you should wait for the release of 2014
preben
Guest
Today I have arrived the package with the suite autocad lt + revit lt ....... show! !I think you should wait for the release of 2014