jim78b
Guest
I have a part made with welded is present a folded sheet...I make the total weight, I trust blindly...I want to check instead of 39.1 kg must be 45!!!!! How come this flaw?
drake
Guest
if you give some extra data you can make any evaluations, so certainly not...
jim78b
Guest
like body screenshot?
- - - updated - - - -It's like swx doesn't make the accounts right!
jim78b
Guest
If I place the file ?io I have 2016.. .
drake
Guest
mail the file if it is not a problem.. .
have you checked trying to export in a neutral format and maybe import it into a different software x make a comparison?
have you checked trying to export in a neutral format and maybe import it into a different software x make a comparison?
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
solidworks does not miss weight. You made some mistakes.
first of all how did you get weight 39.1? Did you make the accounts by hand? with other software? You weighed him in the garage?
then: did you put your hand on something that may have altered the weight? Is there any body with different material?
It is obvious that at least you have to post screenshots otherwise on what you can reason to understand the problem, on the two weights and the word sheet?
mail the file that drake how you can read has 2016 and maybe even a step that to check the weight is also good that
first of all how did you get weight 39.1? Did you make the accounts by hand? with other software? You weighed him in the garage?
then: did you put your hand on something that may have altered the weight? Is there any body with different material?
It is obvious that at least you have to post screenshots otherwise on what you can reason to understand the problem, on the two weights and the word sheet?
mail the file that drake how you can read has 2016 and maybe even a step that to check the weight is also good that
jim78b
Guest
no I did property and then mass!
jim78b
Guest
then place the file. attention that the chains are not to consider in the weight, I put the weight of 0.6 kg that would be to be taken into account but swx sees me 16 parts....I tried to put in quantity 1 but nothing puts 16 but the problem is not that I know.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
and the result you feel correct as you got it?
jim78b
Guest
View attachment C1601-7011. STEP.rarView attachment 44987View attachment 44987
- - - updated - - - -I did with excel amount x weights, and then also by hand
- - - updated - - - -Now I have removed the chain instead the chains is the weight is not right x 0.05 kg!! !
- - - updated - - - -I did with excel amount x weights, and then also by hand
- - - updated - - - -Now I have removed the chain instead the chains is the weight is not right x 0.05 kg!! !
jim78b
Guest
I took off the chains- - - updated - - - -there is still 0.05 that is wrong to count x me
drake
Guest
I did a quick test by opening your file, hiding the chains and making the separate cut with the due sums and providing me 35.515... the value is what you indicate....
but with excel you have x case added the weight of the sp1 plates?
but with excel you have x case added the weight of the sp1 plates?
jim78b
Guest
Oh, thank you.
- - - updated - - - -I mean if you do like me in the table you see it comes out more
drake
Guest
If it's wrong now I don't know how to say that it would be to control the weight of the individual elements, but I don't think it's wrong. doing the weights sum I have 35.52 not 35.57 as indicated by you. . .
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
because the figures in the table are rounded to the second upper digit, then the 0.772 should be 0.718; the 0.08 should be 0.76 and so on. This leads to 0.05 error.
I imagine that the total weights of the individual elements you made them with an equation. stop there, it makes no sense to make the total sum up and then lose to half a tenth of gram for a pile scale.
really weights and sell such an object with the barbell from orology? add the welds, the extra or less millimeter of the pipes and platelets of attack and see where the tenths of kilo are finished.. .
I imagine that the total weights of the individual elements you made them with an equation. stop there, it makes no sense to make the total sum up and then lose to half a tenth of gram for a pile scale.
really weights and sell such an object with the barbell from orology? add the welds, the extra or less millimeter of the pipes and platelets of attack and see where the tenths of kilo are finished.. .
drake
Guest
before I forgot that with the chains I have 45.115 and not 39.1!
drake
Guest
However there is something strange, because in the model the total mass is actually 39.06 unlike the distinct that from 45.115.. .
drake
Guest
The fact is this... in the distinct he gives you the sum of the value you put, while in the model calculates the weight in fiction of geometry and material. the two values do not match, so the result is correct, i.e. in the separate you have the value imposed regardless of the real value calculated by the software. . .
jim78b
Guest
It is not a matter of watches .this I wanted to understand if I was wrong anything here . then it is x approximation! Okay, thank you, everyone.
jim78b
Guest
However I still do not accept the thing...how is it possible that in the distinct makes a weight and in the model another?