lucadileta
Guest
Hi guys, I've been working a lot lately with cryogenic implants that are essentially made up of hundreds of tube sections. to make a variety of fem analyses, I find myself having to convert the step files of these tubes into models formed by the external surface. essentially I always do the same passage:
1 I create an external surface of the tube with an offset with distance 0
2 eliminate the solid part of the tube
now as I am really a tide I thought to make a macro that essentially does these steps.
I have no experience in this regard and for this I was wondering how much I can make the macro, side or even at the level of together. I try to explain myself better. As I would not like to open every single part and follow the macro I wanted to know if it was possible to run it together, in the sense that they select more parts within a set and the macro does what it has to.
Does anyone have ideas/experiences about it?
thanks as usual to all! :smile:
1 I create an external surface of the tube with an offset with distance 0
2 eliminate the solid part of the tube
now as I am really a tide I thought to make a macro that essentially does these steps.
I have no experience in this regard and for this I was wondering how much I can make the macro, side or even at the level of together. I try to explain myself better. As I would not like to open every single part and follow the macro I wanted to know if it was possible to run it together, in the sense that they select more parts within a set and the macro does what it has to.
Does anyone have ideas/experiences about it?
thanks as usual to all! :smile:

