sheet metal parts.

[graziano-g]

hi, I modeled / enlarged a half of a symmetric support in sheet metal so I started an axieme I inserted two instances and finished modeling.
Now I need the two-part flatteners.
I know, it's simple, I'm not leaving.... .
solidworks 2015
Thank you, no matter what.

Hi.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

What does it have to do with the fact that it's a set?
open the part, create the table, insert the view and selections seen flattened

a lot of times. the last, to say,: https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/ripetizione-piatta-su-tavola.55378/#post-431328

 

[graziano-g]

thanks for the answer but it does not work.... .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

thanks for the answer but it does not work.... .

Please. sin

 

[graziano-g]

patience. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

So much for the record it flattens without problems. I tried it at work.
The operations you did in the environment together are not propagated to the parts.

 

[TorMec]

hi, I modeled / enlarged a half of a symmetric support in sheet metal so I started an axieme I inserted two instances and finished modeling.
Now I need the two-part flatteners.
I know, it's simple, I'm not leaving.... .
solidworks 2015
Thank you, no matter what.

Hi.View attachment 53729

hello but you want to handle it as a single piece or two separate pieces? In the second case I agree with massivon.in the first case you have to build it differently to have development.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

can not be managed as a single part, say the upper and lower inches.
In addition to this, those two pieces are in the environment together and one cannot develop from environment together, indeed one can not really model a sheet in the environment together

 

[pose63]

the result can be obtained by propagating the functions of together with the parts, even if there are errors of relationships in the sketches.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

we have read in three users that you can develop.
I ask gracefully to explain what does not work, what procedures it performs and other because with the phrase

but it doesn't work

it is not possible to help him.
in the link I put to post #2 is the solution https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/ripetizione-piatta-su-tavola.55378/#post-431303. of course if there is no development configuration as in this case just follow the last step and that is to say, open the drawing, insert the view of the sheet and put the tick on flat view

 

[Onyx68]

I looked at your details. Obviously you started a part of the modeling in the single then you continued the work together. clearly development is possible only from the single particular non-axiemi. in any case I recommend to use already sheet metal environment and make the folds and other processing already from the sheet and not from the solid then converted into sheet metal. With regard to machining, excavating, holes, etc., you can import sketches from the set into your single sheet so that we remain further worked in the particular flattened.(I would not like to repeat what they listed above colleagues. ) does not work because he tries to develop from the assist. . .

 

[Onyx68]

another observation: in your case given the processing added out of your single part you look carefully for the development the laser goes in alarm as your dig in corner is not correctly executed in the sheet but together as a precision mechanics processing. double edges (with lines makes the laser cut twice with return then risk of retracting the grid... put well the bases of the sketch in the sheet metal environment then some processing except possibly the works on the expanse but and a rare maneuver. everything is modeled in the single part especially for sheet metal.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

With regard to machining, excavating, holes, etc., you can import sketches from the set into your single sheet so that we remain further processing in the particular flattened

It is not neccesary to import the sketches, just propagate the functions to the parts.

It doesn't work because he's trying to make the development from the axieme. . .

is likely but we do not know

 

[Onyx68]

Last observation (spero) remember that you are really not a surgeon in sheet modeling so I refer to factor k (extension) after bending risks that your article and out measurements... sure to keep the size of the precise finished, your operator must grind the pieces.... so: between a sheet between the edges does not exist "zero" i.e. attached but leaves light of some tenth or depends on the accuracy of the vs equipment ...

 

[Onyx68]

It is not neccesary to import the sketches, just propagate the functions to the parts.

is likely but we do not know

I tried i... has two extra details added work in the axieme.. .

I never use import of sketches or other processing on either side even if the 3d allows it.. question of organization of the company and working methods imposed. I have collaborated with the coetry group and reaffirm the concept. They are very tax and share. . .

 

[Onyx68]

hi, I modeled / enlarged a half of a symmetric support in sheet metal so I started an axieme I inserted two instances and finished modeling.
Now I need the two-part flatteners.
I know, it's simple, I'm not leaving.... .
solidworks 2015
Thank you, no matter what.

Hi.View attachment 53729

This attachment contains a detail of yours that I have saved in development in scale. a dxf and a tav sw v18

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I tried i... has two extra details added work in the axieme.. .

as I wrote I opened the file and saw how it is done and I also asserted that the side files flatten without problems and I linked a page, and there are many others in the forum, in which it is explained as

I never use import of sketches or other processing on either side even if the 3d allows it.. question of organization of the company and working methods imposed. I have collaborated with the coetry group and reaffirm the concept. They are very tax and share. . .

You don't understand what you mean by this phrase
you never use sketch imports, but you propose it to others. to someone can serve to do work together of two different parts for various reasons., maybe he must bend separately the details and then once welded to work them... What do we know? or his method of work is optimal with the workings together and then he forgot, or he did not know he could do it, propagate them to the parts
What does the cohesian group have to do with it?

small note, if you attach a drawing file without part does not serve anything and also a dxf without bend lines or bending data does not serve anything

 

[Onyx68]

as I wrote I opened the file and saw how it is done and I also asserted that the side files flatten without problems and I linked a page, and there are many others in the forum, in which it is explained as


You don't understand what you mean by this phrase
you never use sketch imports, but you propose it to others. to someone can serve to do work together of two different parts for various reasons., maybe he must bend separately the details and then once welded to work them... What do we know? or his method of work is optimal with the workings together and then he forgot, or he did not know he could do it, propagate them to the parts
What does the cohesian group have to do with it?

small note, if you attach a drawing file without part does not serve anything and also a dxf without bend lines or bending data does not serve anything

*I proposed as to follow the desired shape you can import the sketch but then build with the quotas the definitive sketch. . .
*I propose it because if you do not have absolute need of precision but you send to the supplier the project then why not import and leave an imported sketch. . .
*In multinational companies you often have a working method but not necessarily in all companies... coesia was an example for those who know him.... nothing... but always we stand on the subject... is smarter. .

for dxf is only a development test... the interested person did not express himself with the request to process completely not even asked documentation to attach, then to release the indications of fold in the development without knowing that equipment and machinery has available and to know some parameters of the plc of the bending machine... and just a gamble to speculate and release the bending lines.... so...

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You're wrong about the controversy, not my intention.
I understand that sometimes it can be useful to import a sketch from one set only to have the track and then requote it in order to unleash it from the references of the axieme, instead I do not understand the utility of importing the sketch of cutting function and let it be bound instead of propagating the function.

for attached files I did not understand the utility when in four users, including you, it was told that it is possible, and how to do, to make development.
Everything here

 

[graziano-g]

we have read in three users that you can develop.
I ask gracefully to explain what does not work, what procedures it performs and other because with the phrase

it is not possible to help him.
in the link I put to post #2 is the solution https://www.cad3d.it/forum1/threads/ripetizione-piatta-su-tavola.55378/#post-431303. of course if there is no development configuration as in this case just follow the last step and that is to say, open the drawing, insert the view of the sheet and put the tick on flat view

first of all thanks to all for the patient kindness granted.
My " doesn't work " is actually a : I wasn't able. the result is the same but the cause is different. Sorry...

I had not propagated the processing to the parts... .
I ask for mercy in the penalty.