Fabietto
Guest
edit. ah no, the upper jaw is double.. Maybe to parade the chestnut from the teeth. .We have to put an extraction point under a spring and we have to patent it!
manual cutter family use, with design defect to be discovered.
Marco F inox
Guest
How witty you are!
but it is difficult to answer when you ask for the things that have already been said to you.
I have found that in so many cases, as in this, the notions and information presented are not read completely and stored.
example: the technical error I put it deliberately to test you in his research.
When you find out, you will bite your fingers saying: I didn't think about it and it was good.
as good scholars, always seek, that then I will tell you: you have seen well!
When I have someone who keeps the camera, while I'm handling the chestnuts, I'll prepare a video. Hello, everyone.
but it is difficult to answer when you ask for the things that have already been said to you.
I have found that in so many cases, as in this, the notions and information presented are not read completely and stored.
example: the technical error I put it deliberately to test you in his research.
When you find out, you will bite your fingers saying: I didn't think about it and it was good.
as good scholars, always seek, that then I will tell you: you have seen well!
When I have someone who keeps the camera, while I'm handling the chestnuts, I'll prepare a video. Hello, everyone.
Cristallo
Guest
certainly is a great exercise to keep the mind active (for those who have nothing else to think about - hence my consideration on being retired).
It's just that maybe one reads the title of a post and thinks maybe he can help, a point of view. and instead you find yourself reading the puzzle week.
the thing that (personally, be clear) irritates me a little is the "indovinello" style.
because I have already read you in other similar discussions (always with the riddle), to me comes a thing like "I know, we see who is at my level", from "maestrino" if so we mean.
it will be a personal sensibility probably, but personally I do not find it in accordance with the spirit of a forum, which mainly aims to help those who are in difficulty/impasses, rather than to do "to those who have it longer".
then probably (I would say almost with certainty) I will be wrong, but it is only to represent you "what" can come to those who read you.
peace and good.
Cristallo
Guest
Um, then I'm wrong to say I'm wrong. .
on you find the solution, otherwise master marco puts you "unprepared". . .
PIETRO2002
Guest
You wrote what I didn't dare write!
Cooperman
Guest
Marco F inox
Guest
the two elements almost touch each other, but do not bump.
Cooperman
Guest
Marco F inox
Guest
you can also put another support, or a handkerchief between base and vertical part, but this is not a problem.
Cooperman
Guest
rinato
Guest
I think there's no place for wine. . .
Vittorio
Guest
Marco F inox
Guest
the blade is in the correct position, central and at the right height.
Cooperman
Guest
how is the cylinder fixed with the fork against the axial movement?
Marco F inox
Guest
the cylinder rotates only, while the fork is fixed with two screws on the cylinder, in axial sense.
in the starting position. the fork is slightly backward, to contain the chestnut that rests on the cylinder.
I appreciate your desire to find the defect and, as you see, I reply to you at this time that I have just returned from a volunteer effort.
Last edited:
Marco F inox
Guest
@cristallo, I didn't ignore you but I waited for all your supporters to arrive.
I disagree with all your words, your thoughts then on pensioners, shatters offense if not censorship, when many of these seek jobs to arrive at the end of months and, many others engage in volunteering, according to their own attitudes and skills.
You know there are people who have a problem, but they don't get any answers?
you know that others start a discussion, then they interrupt the problem, why didn't they get enough stimuli?
follow the people who, in order to acquire posts, give evasive answers, mistakes technically or just to contest, without proposing anything?
you know that "competent" people instead of saying: In my opinion, do they claim that this operation cannot be done, then be denied?
You know that almost always, even if required, most proposers, while receiving all the best suggestions, does not show the solutions adopted?
Do you know that there are people who give the soul, to quickly propose suggestions, tables, formulas, drawings, photos etc. even at night?
you know that other people, with various directions, but with thirst to know, do anything to capture the defect, which is visible but not identifiable?
and you think that presenting a small unpublished project, with a mistake to be sought, is not a positive stimulus, but even contrary to the spirit of the forum?
go to read how much he writes and confirms gianni dessì, even a few days ago!
Look, there's no "master" in me like you say, who wants to show that he's superior: You read bad and you can't read between the lines.
I studied, worked a lot and learned a lot, but I'm still studying, even after dinner, to be ready to help those who need it.
you do preconceptions about the style of my writing, instead of looking inside, but then you too have escaped my proposal, prefer the puzzle week, where the questions are more difficult, because the easy you can not answer.
I have to point out where the technical defect is, I know that you don't care, but others do.
in the back there are two springs, one internal compression, adjustable, which pushes upwards, to make the blade adhere to the chestnut and engraved it, the other external traction, lighter, that keeps the spoon tray on which can rest the chestnut.
as they are bound both to the same two elements, (the excursion of the tray is minimal) are competing and cancel each other.
the external traction spring must be bound to the base, as seen from the photo.
the system works anyway, but only because the internal spring is much stronger and loaded than the external one.
I did the video with the left hand, while the right engraved the chestnut, it is shaky but I hope you see correctly and, it does not miss a shot.
I've described what I see without ever wanting to offend anyone.
Unfortunately the video is not visible because not supported, I still have to learn to convert it.
Attachments
Vittorio
Guest
wave @marco f inoxIn short, the story of the pensioner didn't go down
It seems like an excess of offense. it was a generic joke like so many that you do also towards other professions.
I still work but I'm also retired, but my passion makes me continue and avoid the conflict of territory with his wife at home.
but I must say that some pensioners also break the bales.. especially those who go to take bread in the right time where in the morning the world moves, but I say.. You're still home an hour, aren't you? :roflmao:
Many pensioners volunteer, honor of merit and humbly do not disband it.
all your forum considerations are known. there are those who collaborate and those who take advantage of it, but it is a characteristic of humans.
said that.. Let's go back to your plan of chestnut size.
Sincerely, that internal spring you're talking about, I'm sorry, but you had to have x-ray glasses to notice it from those pictures.
I thought it was a adjusting screw for the tilt of the blade.
I probably overestimated your experience and never imagined that you could put a spring for that purpose.
It seems like an excess of offense. it was a generic joke like so many that you do also towards other professions.
I still work but I'm also retired, but my passion makes me continue and avoid the conflict of territory with his wife at home.
but I must say that some pensioners also break the bales.. especially those who go to take bread in the right time where in the morning the world moves, but I say.. You're still home an hour, aren't you? :roflmao:
Many pensioners volunteer, honor of merit and humbly do not disband it.
all your forum considerations are known. there are those who collaborate and those who take advantage of it, but it is a characteristic of humans.
said that.. Let's go back to your plan of chestnut size.
Sincerely, that internal spring you're talking about, I'm sorry, but you had to have x-ray glasses to notice it from those pictures.
I thought it was a adjusting screw for the tilt of the blade.
I probably overestimated your experience and never imagined that you could put a spring for that purpose.
falonef
Guest
I'm sorry, but I can't see the second traction spring.
I'm curious! Would you please help me understand or find her?
I'm curious! Would you please help me understand or find her?
Cristallo
Guest
I think it is necessary to respond in an articulated manner. . .
Now, those you call yourself "supporters" are actually your industry counterparts. I don't know anyone I've ever had previous relationships with them.
In a very soft way I expressed my feeling, beyond the technical knowledge, on which many others (unexpectedly) reacted. I would ask in your place if "this sex" (the writer) has some reason, since it was shared by others (I repeat, unknown).
but I reiterate the concept, which I see is ostico, that a technical forum works when guy x has a problem/impassess and the y and z guys propose solutions and/or stimuli to the solution (y and z assume that they are crystal and marco f stainless).
Now, if y (marco f inox) had a problem, I find it right to ask for advice/help/solution.
but I do not find it correct that y (marco f inox) the problem does not have it because it has already identified it, and it also has the solution, but it interpella x and z to find not only the solution, but also the problem (of which probably to x and z does not care absolutely nothing).
I'm not going to make the philosopher, but many/many in here, work and solve problems daily in their work. dedicate a part of their time (without taking it away from work) for passion and desire to help. well, in my view, "consuming" that time, those resources, to find a solution (and the problem relavito) that the proposer non ha, I think it is contrary to the spirit of the community. Then you can think of it as you want, my thought is this.
on condition inverse, you had the daring to propose a solution in a field not yours,
proposing to the poor student a solution that is absolutely wrong. You did it in good faith without doubt, but you did it with the piglio of "I know". On the other hand, the student took what you wrote for gold, wrong across the line. I am referring to the discussion on the decoration of the floors. talks about bearings, gears and forces to fold a sheet. but not to speak of masonry, especially coming from a region that has "discovered" that pillars/matures and floors must be bound together and not only rested for a few years (after the earthquake). from me those basic notions were for granted 35 years ago at school.
you studied, worked, and you're still studying and learning other things. Good. But do you think this is an exception, that you are a white fly? Why do you feel the need to say that?
you have to say... And by the way, you left with the post to say, of course you have to say it. but I wouldn't let you down, if you don't say it doesn't change anyone's life (on one thing you're right to sell: I don't care). you have solved a problem that you have created, with a solution that costs (between materials and equipment to produce it) to arm 30 euros, when the result is obtained with a tool that is sold to 7 euros (marketing, packing, patent, production, mologation and shipment included).
Get your money.
You know me little, very little. here I have many more detractors than supporters. and above all not in this section, in which I am only a poor reader and I do not understand almost anything.
Now, those you call yourself "supporters" are actually your industry counterparts. I don't know anyone I've ever had previous relationships with them.
In a very soft way I expressed my feeling, beyond the technical knowledge, on which many others (unexpectedly) reacted. I would ask in your place if "this sex" (the writer) has some reason, since it was shared by others (I repeat, unknown).
Of course I know.
but I reiterate the concept, which I see is ostico, that a technical forum works when guy x has a problem/impassess and the y and z guys propose solutions and/or stimuli to the solution (y and z assume that they are crystal and marco f stainless).
Now, if y (marco f inox) had a problem, I find it right to ask for advice/help/solution.
but I do not find it correct that y (marco f inox) the problem does not have it because it has already identified it, and it also has the solution, but it interpella x and z to find not only the solution, but also the problem (of which probably to x and z does not care absolutely nothing).
I'm not going to make the philosopher, but many/many in here, work and solve problems daily in their work. dedicate a part of their time (without taking it away from work) for passion and desire to help. well, in my view, "consuming" that time, those resources, to find a solution (and the problem relavito) that the proposer non ha, I think it is contrary to the spirit of the community. Then you can think of it as you want, my thought is this.
see, I would never dream of telling you how to use a bearing or how to fold a sheet, because my knowledge in mechanics shatters absolute zero.
on condition inverse, you had the daring to propose a solution in a field not yours,
proposing to the poor student a solution that is absolutely wrong. You did it in good faith without doubt, but you did it with the piglio of "I know". On the other hand, the student took what you wrote for gold, wrong across the line. I am referring to the discussion on the decoration of the floors. talks about bearings, gears and forces to fold a sheet. but not to speak of masonry, especially coming from a region that has "discovered" that pillars/matures and floors must be bound together and not only rested for a few years (after the earthquake). from me those basic notions were for granted 35 years ago at school.
I don't prefer the puzzle week. I said the Yours post is week enigmistic. Didn't you really understand what I wrote? (note the difference I say "you didn't understand what I wrote", to someone who says to me "you read bad... you can't read... you can't answer. You make preconceptions... ").
you studied, worked, and you're still studying and learning other things. Good. But do you think this is an exception, that you are a white fly? Why do you feel the need to say that?
I don't want to tell you, but someone at first followed you, then the discussion died, most likely because of lack of interest.
you have to say... And by the way, you left with the post to say, of course you have to say it. but I wouldn't let you down, if you don't say it doesn't change anyone's life (on one thing you're right to sell: I don't care). you have solved a problem that you have created, with a solution that costs (between materials and equipment to produce it) to arm 30 euros, when the result is obtained with a tool that is sold to 7 euros (marketing, packing, patent, production, mologation and shipment included).
Get your money.
install the camtasia program and convert your video to an animated gif.
PIETRO2002
Guest
we make a beautiful "burollata" in company, maybe watered by a good red and everything is resolved, in wine veritas! prosit!