manual cutter family use, with design defect to be discovered.

[TETRASTORE]

see, I would never dream of telling you how to use a bearing or how to fold a sheet, because my knowledge in mechanics shatters absolute zero.
on condition inverse, you had the daring to propose a solution in a field not yours,
proposing to the poor student a solution that is absolutely wrong.

I agree with this quotation but I disagree with others concerning this discussion.

I'm sorry. @marco f inox It is a collaborative and helpful user who from the first post has clearly highlighted that it was an exercise and only required to identify an error (to him already known and correct) in his project. who was interested could try, who was not able to refrain from wasting time.
I personally did not understand the operation of the device well and would have preferred an explanatory scheme for which I abstained from the intervention.
Perhaps these types of "exercises" should be placed in a special section, but not prohibited or derise causing the annihilation of the authors who have given themselves to be made, believing in good faith to provide a technical contribution.
on this forum, for example, there is an old discussion in which several users have exposed their complete projects in 3d not to show who has it longer or how good it was, but to show others the technical level of their elaborates, providing subsequently to those who demanded advice on techniques adopted and solutions.
in the specific case of the device @marco f inox, we are in the field of diy (do it yourself) of which the web is flooded with applications of which some geniuses, for which the authors have not cared about costs, industrialization, etc., but only to share a solution of a car tool built especially for personal satisfaction.
the intention was surely to realize a device that partially automated an operation (cut of chestnuts) that, surely, can be done manually with a commercial object of the cost of a few euros to make a kilo of boilers in front of the fireplace, but I can assure you that in the sands of the chestnut this object becomes challenging when they have to affect 40-50 quintals at a time.
I therefore believe that this device @marco f inox should not be derided and underestimated but should be correctly compared with other analogues existing on the market, limiting comments (if one wishes, but is not obliged) to the pure technical aspect that I think was what was initially requested by the author of this discussion.

 

[Marco F inox]

wave @marco f inoxIn short, the story of the pensioner didn't go down
It seems like an excess of offense. it was a generic joke like so many that you do also towards other professions.

I still work but I'm also retired, but my passion makes me continue and avoid the conflict of territory with his wife at home.

but I must say that some pensioners also break the bales.. especially those who go to take bread in the right time where in the morning the world moves, but I say.. You're still home an hour, aren't you? :roflmao:

Many pensioners volunteer, honor of merit and humbly do not disband it.

all your forum considerations are known. there are those who collaborate and those who take advantage of it, but it is a characteristic of humans.

said that.. Let's go back to your plan of chestnut size.

Sincerely, that internal spring you're talking about, I'm sorry, but you had to have x-ray glasses to notice it from those pictures.

I thought it was a adjusting screw for the tilt of the blade.

I probably overestimated your experience and never imagined that you could put a spring for that purpose.

beyond the images, there are the words that describe the operation, but if you do not read, you cannot say that you do not see it, leans below, leans on the base and above there is the screw that records it.

 

[Marco F inox]

I'm sorry, but I can't see the second traction spring.

I'm curious! Would you please help me understand or find her?

@falonet,the second pull spring is external to the rear end and you see all, including hooks.

 

[Vittorio]

beyond the images, there are the words that describe the operation, but if you do not read, you cannot say that you do not see it, leans below, leans on the base and above there is the screw that records it.

Forgive me @marco f inox.
In your first post, you wrote a sermon that, if you author, I went to reread it at a distance of months, you would have difficulty understanding the operation.
to be collaborative things must be clear and as drawings also well you should have placed a simple scheme of operation. (which was also asked to you)
Now. You give me the sacred pleasure of pointing out to me with a nice red circle where this blessed inner spring is located and you also have to explain to me how you understand that it is a spring.
You give me the impression that you want to put people in trouble more than to stimulate them.

 

[Vittorio]

I therefore believe that this device of @marco f stainless steel should not be derided and underestimated

depends on one as it stands.. sarcasm is a reaction due not only to this subject.

 

[Vittorio]

@marco f inoxForget the red circle.. Go!
I wanted to give you some more time and I'm pumping up to 814% I found the spring.

Congratulations. you could work for the week of the puzzle or write essays on the gift of synthesis

 

[PIETRO2002]

Are we going to do it or not? the chestnuts carry them marco, of course already cut, I bring some bottle of wine!

 

[Cristallo]

Perhaps these types of "exercises" should be placed in a special section ....

I agree with you, at least those who are not interested do not examine the section.

but I can assure you that in the festivals of the chestnut this object becomes challenging when they have to affect 40-50 quintals at a time.

I agree here, but you don't use this.
there will be devices already complete and approved.
the target of the device was ±1kg chestnuts, not 40-50 quintals.

Are we going to do it or not? the chestnuts carry them marco, of course already cut, I bring some bottle of wine!

I have to tell you, chestnuts, it's not like he's making a line. But if you bring a little spursat...

 

[Archimed&]

but, apart from the story of the spring where I agree with victorious, you cannot see well, it seems exaggerated the criticisms to rotten, indeed, I find pleasant these mechanical "indovinelli" that can always make us learn new things.

 

[Marco F inox]

but, apart from the story of the spring where I agree with victorious, you cannot see well, it seems exaggerated the criticisms to rotten, indeed, I find pleasant these mechanical "indovinelli" that can always make us learn new things.

That's exactly what I always thought.
for everyone, I have to make a correction to my description of the operation:
a non was omitted, i.e. the external traction spring should not be bound to the base.. .

 

[paulpaul]

but not to speak of masonry, especially coming from a region that has "discovered" that pillars/matures and floors must be bound together and not only rested for a few years (after the earthquake). from me those basic notions were for granted 35 years ago at school.

I am sorry but I would like to deepen this statement, coming from the same region: here the program of science and technology of construction is different than elsewhere? or is people less capable? or does the rules not apply correctly? or the norms were there but were "wrong" for the territory?

 

[Marco F inox]

I would never have imagined that my discussion could generate so much dust.
I do not answer to these last negative considerations, to me addressed, as it would be like to crash against a rubber wall, while having so many to say and fight.
I therefore limit myself to thank those who shared, appreciated and reiterated the concept of my work.
thanks to those who do not understand it, have shown interest.
thanks to those who did not intervene, for any reason, but certainly curious.
thanks to those who wanted to bring spiritually the problem on a laughter plan.
thanks to whom, although I do not understand anything of mechanics, he said his.
I also have to say that the 6/7 euro trade product reported, I bought it, I used it, I broke it and threw it.
who can be interested, know that: it does not adapt to all the chestnuts and to all the hands, sometimes it is necessary to repeat the operation, it is necessary a lot of force and broad hands, the plastic ones break and the metal ones do not resist and deform, because too weak.
with my prototype, the strength of a 4/5-year-old child is enough to make him enjoy in total safety, a matter of levers.
thanks for the suggestion of camtasia, but I have not yet succeeded.
where I have no skills, I must be stuffed like a child.
as repeatedly requested, allego operating scheme.
for the "castagnata", as I have worked more than all, I will limit myself to bring the tool, then you cut and all drink!

 

[Archimed&]

Why don't you trade it? I mean seriously, I'm thinking about an idea to put on the market, even though I know how it's not easy between market research etc.

 

[Vittorio]

ciao @marco f inoxFinally!
I repeat my initial thought.
If you were posting the picture immediately, surely the discussion would not have become astounding and monotonous.
I must be honest, if you had immediately shared the scheme.. I wouldn't have found what you consider the mistake and say it all.. I wouldn't even put the spring inside.

 

[falonef]

you could reverse the roles and say that in one of the views there is a representation error ..

error is clearly visible

 

[Marco F inox]

you could reverse the roles and say that in one of the views there is a representation error ..

error is clearly visible

I didn't treat all the hidden lines, but if I did, how could you, make this observation?

 

[Marco F inox]

Why don't you trade it? I mean seriously, I'm thinking about an idea to put on the market, even though I know how it's not easy between market research etc.

Your words are inspiring, but if I answer you here, I'd be upset with someone's sensitivity and envy, generating another dust.
If you want, we can talk privately, I think it's allowed.

 

[Archimed&]

Your words are inspiring, but if I answer you here, I'd be upset with someone's sensitivity and envy, generating another dust.
If you want, we can talk privately, I think it's allowed.

hello write to me as soon as I have time I answer

 

[wert]

Your words are inspiring, but if I answer you here, I'd be upset with someone's sensitivity and envy, generating another dust.
If you want, we can talk privately, I think it's allowed.

your post and the previous one highlight your poor propensity to comparison and criticism. As far as I'm concerned, I don't have any envy or envy to you, at least for your handkerchief. inevitably your way of ports has exposed you to criticism and you know, who goes to the mill infarina... Now you can't complain if someone has made you notice, shouting at the plot... They're exhilarating.

 

[falonef]

I didn't treat all the hidden lines, but if I did, how could you, make this observation?

Your answer with a question to my question (take the word game) surprises me.

Is there probably a misunderstanding? ! ? !