..eh, with imagination and patience the important thing is to arrive:biggrin:.I used "burnt and dirty" things but since it is a "exercise" and that I use 2009 I place the file so you can have fun to massacre me or maybe you can give me some good straight:tongue:
Who are you talking about?You took my request perfectly. .
Yes, but I did. just change the sketches further and bring it to the desired "form". or as mike said to reduce the internal rays to the minimum, that even if it does not reflect the reality to trace the shape of the development can go more than well (with an adequate k accordingly).I saw Annex 13534, but there remain about 4 mm of air to be sold on the edges, which is not easy.
The same as I used here and we usually use in company.the material is aisi 304.
Yes, you're right to draw "how is true" though as all thatI know. only that I like to have the model that reflects the real shape of the "physical" profile (and those rays are measured by me to sample in the workshop, tenth more tenth less..), also for the possible modeling of other details that should go "to copy" and to respect the real ingombs.
..yes, for the molds and machines you have you In the company.
I made it for our parameters (we have the bending machine from a yearn, first I made everything out, and I'm still impracticing), but I don't feel like I'm putting it indistinctly to everyone outside our workshop. I've seen a grandma's enough to overwhelm everything. when I was out, I only provided the drawings of the finished, for the development and the procedure was arranged the supplier.
already inside I suspect that some operators go to change the resets of the machine, because still remaining the developments often I happen to find changed the sets of piego length (value axis x on our very old cn.) that no longer respect the measures I had detected at its time. in any case for safety is almost always a test sample on a "striscia" (also recommended by the service technician.. to me it seems strange, what numerical control is if every time I have to do a test and throw away a strip of stainless steel? we do almost nothing in series).
greetings
Marco:smile:
azz... change technical !!!
with our plant we have the possibility to "save" the bending parameters according to material and series of matrices and punches in use...This is what is the 2200 mm bending machine that we have... over 4000 years ago...
Please!from the various information received, I took the cue to perform the tub in a different way. I believe that it is practical, but I have strong doubts about design and feasibility. Therefore I attach two files, to show how I developed the corners to "c".
Unfortunately I managed to make only half a tank.
Sebastiano
I posted the file in the forum, but I attach it again. I realized that a lot of provebilmete is not a viable road, as I can't finish the other half of tank. Moreover the laser cutting should cut the edge to 45°, which is unthinkable. I am open to every suggestion on the road taken.Please!
..the images for us "meschinelli" :biggrin:
greetings
Marco:smile:
in what forum? here we are in the forum.. only that your file is from 2010 and in many we are still with 2009, so I ask the pictures.I posted the file in the forum, but I attach it again. I realized that a lot of provebilmete is not a viable road, as I can't finish the other half of tank. Moreover the laser cutting should cut the edge to 45°, which is unthinkable. I am open to every suggestion on the road taken.
Thank you.
Sebastiano
greetings
I'll get you new files. I also put the file to read it with the sw.purtroppo viewer I can't mirror the part.in what forum? here we are in the forum.. only that your file is from 2010 and in many we are still with 2009, so I ask the pictures.
the other half tries to mirror it (key, if it is symmetric) as it made poly.
laser cutting (at least 2d, normally used for sheeting) produces "normal" cuts, but it is not a problem; that development cuts it quietly (it is similar to the previous posted by me).
..ah, finally thank you for the image.. Maybe she was a little older. You know, age:biggrin:
greetings
Marco:smile:
It's amazing! in a few steps I saw develop the tub. and think that I spent evenings rebuilding corners, "c", without ever coming to head or finding long and laborious solutions. Thank you for the table is very useful as precious. :finger:watch this little video tutorial (without pretense...ehh...):finger:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ujctjjnzhtz/part20.zipps, I can't show the function tree. . .
help.. .
Annex also to the list of withdrawals we use at company level.
I followed the video carefully but I can't do the stess and things, either from solid or from sheet.:frown:watch this little video tutorial (without pretense...ehh...):finger:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ujctjjnzhtz/part20.zipps, I can't show the function tree. . .
help.. .
Annex also to the list of withdrawals we use at company level.
Hello, Sam... ...it takes the edge folded back as well, that "turns all around".
but brother shiren, you didn't start using solidworks long ago?
greetings
Mar
hi the video did it with capture video of swx?watch this little video tutorial (without pretense...ehh...):finger:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/ujctjjnzhtz/part20.zipps, I can't show the function tree. . .
help.. .
Annex also to the list of withdrawals we use at company level.
being you a designer I expected this question, while if you show the table to a folder will tell you immediately that it is made so only to avoid that sldwk create too large discharges in the adjacent corners.hi the video did it with capture video of swx?
thanks for posting your folding table. It's always interesting to compare the data.
But a question arises spontaneously. How do you make folds on 4-5 mm sp with 0.01 radius on the iron? Does the outer edge not clinch? once we also asked her "on edge" but then especially on the edges with high thicknesses the cliques were obvious and over time caused either structural or rusting (we use galvanized sheets). Is this a problem with my supplier?