maxopus
Guest
thankschoen per il complimenten, vecchia marmitten:biggrin:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FRAGRO
Guest
no one using solidworks and solidege says his on his program?
cacciatorino
Guest
look that if you use the "search" function you will find hundreds of posts where these two programs compare.no one using solidworks and solidege says his on his program?
It is good to avoid using capital letters when writing messages.
Bye.
FRAGRO
Guest
I'm sorry.: finger:
re_solidworks
Guest
I have both swx and proe. I use swx for a long time and on this tool I have a lot of experience, in addition I have a great pdm (or apdm as the manufacturer calls it) that facilitates me a lot.
the merits that pointed out maxopus there are, there is no shadow of doubt, especially regarding scalability and stability.
the fact that it is sold at the list price of a midrange does not mean that it has a low price. when using scalability prices increase and maintenance is paid on each package.
solidworks has some extra package from the base and if you try to make an identical configuration to a premium swx proe will cost at least triple.
swx from standard welded function, proe from this function with an optional package from the cost of 4350 euros (if I don't remember bad). ptc framework is better than swx welds, but if you just need the swx functions there is a difference.
if you go to pdm ptc offers products that cost a lot, especially at the implementation level. for swx you can spend really little and have excellent products for the small/medium enterprise (for the big the cost is always high).
There are some proes that I don't like, it's a subjective opinion and probably due to the swx habit, but I don't know what to do with it.
I don't like how the boards are lying, there are some limitations (e.g. billboards hookable only once), the views must be created at 90% in 3d and I find myself better managing the table while I do it, not while model, more is very poor at the level of symbols. you can have all, but many you have to create them.
I don't like working with workbooks, I prefer cad to arrange with the routes as swx does.
I do not like the management of components in memory, very effective when you want to download it, am may turn out to be a double-cut weapon in case of user distraction.
the management of external references with swx seems more flexible, especially if you have to change the references of a table from one component to another, or from one side to another. It seems to me that in the case of the table with proes it is not quite possible.
If I had to choose from scratch... I don't know what to take. I currently prefer swx, especially because I know him much better and if I had to work only with proe it would take me a long time before being productive as with swx.
Basically the difference is this: with a "moderate" swx figure is more complete, if you are displaced to spend more proes can give something more where swx (like all mid colleagues) plant.
about speed (to execute a project) mainly counts the handle of the user, since both are excellent tools.
the merits that pointed out maxopus there are, there is no shadow of doubt, especially regarding scalability and stability.
the fact that it is sold at the list price of a midrange does not mean that it has a low price. when using scalability prices increase and maintenance is paid on each package.
solidworks has some extra package from the base and if you try to make an identical configuration to a premium swx proe will cost at least triple.
swx from standard welded function, proe from this function with an optional package from the cost of 4350 euros (if I don't remember bad). ptc framework is better than swx welds, but if you just need the swx functions there is a difference.
if you go to pdm ptc offers products that cost a lot, especially at the implementation level. for swx you can spend really little and have excellent products for the small/medium enterprise (for the big the cost is always high).
There are some proes that I don't like, it's a subjective opinion and probably due to the swx habit, but I don't know what to do with it.
I don't like how the boards are lying, there are some limitations (e.g. billboards hookable only once), the views must be created at 90% in 3d and I find myself better managing the table while I do it, not while model, more is very poor at the level of symbols. you can have all, but many you have to create them.
I don't like working with workbooks, I prefer cad to arrange with the routes as swx does.
I do not like the management of components in memory, very effective when you want to download it, am may turn out to be a double-cut weapon in case of user distraction.
the management of external references with swx seems more flexible, especially if you have to change the references of a table from one component to another, or from one side to another. It seems to me that in the case of the table with proes it is not quite possible.
If I had to choose from scratch... I don't know what to take. I currently prefer swx, especially because I know him much better and if I had to work only with proe it would take me a long time before being productive as with swx.
Basically the difference is this: with a "moderate" swx figure is more complete, if you are displaced to spend more proes can give something more where swx (like all mid colleagues) plant.
about speed (to execute a project) mainly counts the handle of the user, since both are excellent tools.
FRAGRO
Guest
Thank you 1000!