• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

capsule apollo

  • Thread starter Thread starter rinato
  • Start date Start date

rinato

Guest
hello to all, I hope not to create confusion by asking a question of "missilistic" in this section.
by personal curiosity: how do the space capsules type apollo go down with the "piatto" side instead of tip, being conical? Shouldn't they have a tendency to turn around? and then how do they handle them: Are the tail timoons rockets?
You have patience, but when I find documentaries on those crazy writers (okay, ok, it was the sixties...) I also have legitimate doubts! . .
 
Hello! Among my various ways, the astronaut and air/space propulsion is one of these! :biggrin:

each cm (command module) had a set of thrusters (small rockets, in practice) used to change the arrangement along the cross axis (beaching) and along the longitudinal axis (roll). these provided to give the capsule the correct order before and during the return phase. initially, still out of the atmosphere and therefore in the absence of aerodynamic forces, the thermal shield was oriented towards the sense of advancement with jets preposed to the control of the beaking. the spherical/conic shape of the capsule and the center of gravity slightly disassembled with respect to the axis of the capsule symmetry guaranteed during the return (in the presence of the aerodynamic force) a stabilizing moment and a non-nuclear portance/resistance ratio, editable through the roll control jets. the latter therefore allowed to vary the projection of the centerpiece on the vertical plane and therefore to vary the portance/resistance ratio of the cm ensuring a certain control of the trajectory. this consisted of a first phase of descent, a recovery of altitude necessary to reduce the thermal stresses on the shield and control the capsule (as mentioned above) so as to arrive exactly in the chosen location, a second phase of descent followed then by the opening of the parachutes, which nevertheless happened quite lower.
 
paulpaul said:
Hello! Among my various ways, the astronaut and air/space propulsion is one of these! :biggrin:

each cm (command module) had a set of thrusters (small rockets, in practice) used to change the arrangement along the cross axis (beaching) and along the longitudinal axis (roll). these provided to give the capsule the correct order before and during the return phase. initially, still out of the atmosphere and therefore in the absence of aerodynamic forces, the thermal shield was oriented towards the sense of advancement with jets preposed to the control of the beaking. the spherical/conic shape of the capsule and the center of gravity slightly disassembled with respect to the axis of the capsule symmetry guaranteed during the return (in the presence of the aerodynamic force) a stabilizing moment and a non-nuclear portance/resistance ratio, editable through the roll control jets. the latter therefore allowed to vary the projection of the centerpiece on the vertical plane and therefore to vary the portance/resistance ratio of the cm ensuring a certain control of the trajectory. this consisted of a first phase of descent, a recovery of altitude necessary to reduce the thermal stresses on the shield and control the capsule (as mentioned above) so as to arrive exactly in the chosen location, a second phase of descent followed then by the opening of the parachutes, which nevertheless happened quite lower.
Click to expand...
http://46blyz.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/gumdroprollthrusters.jpghere you see well the nozzles of the stabilization engines.
 
paulpaul said:
Hello! Among my various ways, the astronaut and air/space propulsion is one of these! :biggrin:

each cm (command module) had a set of thrusters (small rockets, in practice) used to change the arrangement along the cross axis (beaching) and along the longitudinal axis (roll). these provided to give the capsule the correct order before and during the return phase. initially, still out of the atmosphere and therefore in the absence of aerodynamic forces, the thermal shield was oriented towards the sense of advancement with jets preposed to the control of the beaking. the spherical/conic shape of the capsule and the center of gravity slightly disassembled with respect to the axis of the capsule symmetry guaranteed during the return (in the presence of the aerodynamic force) a stabilizing moment and a non-nuclear portance/resistance ratio, editable through the roll control jets. the latter therefore allowed to vary the projection of the centerpiece on the vertical plane and therefore to vary the portance/resistance ratio of the cm ensuring a certain control of the trajectory. this consisted of a first phase of descent, a recovery of altitude necessary to reduce the thermal stresses on the shield and control the capsule (as mentioned above) so as to arrive exactly in the chosen location, a second phase of descent followed then by the opening of the parachutes, which nevertheless happened quite lower.
Click to expand...
...so they didn't come down "leave" by necessity. and the slope of the trajectory placed the center of the trap under the main axis of the cone.
which seems sensible and inevitable. and x-timonare rockets, after orienting the cm with the bow shield, used them only for route corrections as the module can remain properly oriented on its own. resistance is inevitable: What gives the portance to an object that, to me, seems "returned" can not be its inclination to longitudinal, as it does not travel horizontal, or is it not?

p.s. this forum deserves an honorary degree (always that at er president you do not want to divide it with others outside him:smile:)
 
rinato said:
...so they didn't come down "leave" by necessity. and the slope of the trajectory placed the center of the trap under the main axis of the cone.
which seems sensible and inevitable. and x-timonare rockets, after orienting the cm with the bow shield, used them only for route corrections as the module can remain properly oriented on its own. resistance is inevitable: What gives the portance to an object that, to me, seems "returned" can not be its inclination to longitudinal, as it does not travel horizontal, or is it not?

p.s. this forum deserves an honorary degree (always that at er president you do not want to divide it with others outside him:smile:)
Click to expand...
Why are you talking about portanza? the cm in return behaves more or less than a rock (meteorite) in fall,
it only serves to maintain the angle of rentro taste (about 7°) and so much resistance to lose speed.
The thermal shield acts as aerodynamic brake (that is because it is not tapered) and an enrgia heat sink.
the aerodynamics comes into play at lower odds where the cm was content to simply fall.
maneuvering rockets were constantly used to keep the capsule in place and were commanded by inertial platforms.

p.s.: Who should I share her degree with? :biggrin:
 
Er Presidente said:
Why are you talking about portanza? the cm in return behaves more or less than a rock (meteorite) in fall,
it only serves to maintain the angle of rentro taste (about 7°) and so much resistance to lose speed.
the thermal shield served as a aerodynamic brake (that's because it's not tapered) and an enrgia heat sink.
the aerodynamics comes into play at lower odds where the cm was content to simply fall.
maneuvering rockets were constantly used to keep the capsule in place and were commanded by inertial platforms.
Click to expand...
It has been paulpaul hhe to talk of portance/resistance not null... I have only deduced that being inevitable resistance, somewhere there must be portance.
that, then, talking about "nothing" is mathematically correct, it seems difficult to me, I guess it meant "equal to 1".

So you think that there is no portance, and the 7th trajectory is maintained only of rudder? I also think this strange because the fall had begun to 7th naturally tends to a parabolic trajectory, and the rockets would always be lit to recover the angle. Or not?
Er Presidente said:
p.s.: Who should I share her degree with? :biggrin:
Click to expand...
Well, come on, that some temerary to sit next door we find it for sure for the ceremony. otherwise we give it to you at 1st semester, and to all the others per second. 6 months ahead.
 
rinato said:
It has been paulpaul hhe to talk of portance/resistance not null... I have only deduced that being inevitable resistance, somewhere there must be portance.
that, then, talking about "nothing" is mathematically correct, it seems difficult to me, I guess it meant "equal to 1".

So you think that there is no portance, and the 7th trajectory is maintained only of rudder? I also think this strange because the fall had begun to 7th naturally tends to a parabolic trajectory, and the rockets would always be lit to recover the angle. Or not?


Well, come on, that some temerary to sit next door we find it for sure for the ceremony. otherwise we give it to you at 1st semester, and to all the others per second. 6 months ahead.
Click to expand...
http://www.apolloexplorer.co.uk/photo/html/as10/10075090.htmI attach the profile of trajectories.
the capsule has a portance, like any object that travels in the atmosphere.
I was weighing you meant a useful carrier to keep control of the flight.
more simply the capsule has the center of gravity (baricentre) and the aerodynamic one studied so that it tends to remain with the shield "on the front".
maneuver rockets are always in action, small pushes (second fractions) to maintain and govern the arrangement of the return module. the trajectory, once set the abandonment of the orbit, can not be "strate". There's a "window" (speed, angle) in which to enter and then there's little more to do than keep the set of the capsule.
if you are wrong "the entrance", or you fall (disintegration) or bounce out of the atmosphere.
 
rinato said:
...
Well, come on, that some temerary to sit next door we find it for sure for the ceremony. otherwise we give it to you at 1st semester, and to all the others per second. 6 months ahead.
Click to expand...
I'm sitting next door. . .interesting (although presumably):biggrin: ) I have to think about it. Anyway, I don't like this temporary advantage thing! :smile:
 
Er Presidente said:
I'm sitting next door. . .interesting (although presumably):biggrin: ) I have to think about it. Anyway, I don't like this temporary advantage thing! :smile:
Click to expand...
Oh, you're dissatisable! I would say almost that for the new year (this here) you did not make more modest proposals.. .
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top