• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

challenge cam to comparison

  • Thread starter Thread starter RS4
  • Start date Start date
Hello, Marangon, I have a question for you if I can.
with delcam can you decide how much to get the tool down in depth and how much to make it penetrate laterally keeping the perpendicular always with the surface?
for example 3mm deep and 0.5mm lateral.
My difficulty was to manage this situation.
 
I've been able to do it with catheism, but it's really complicated.... maybe someone more experienced than me on this module knows a shorter path? ? ?
Hello hairy

with a little dimesticity with catia and simple with the multiaxis curvilinea you can decide depth from the surface and distance from the contour respectively calculated before, you have to know the type of processing

simple

Hi.
 

Attachments

  • smussi.webp
    smussi.webp
    135 KB · Views: 64
  • New Picture.webp
    New Picture.webp
    107.5 KB · Views: 55
Hello, Marangon, I have a question for you if I can.
with delcam can you decide how much to get the tool down in depth and how much to make it penetrate laterally keeping the perpendicular always with the surface?
for example 3mm deep and 0.5mm lateral.
My difficulty was to manage this situation.
I change those two parameters circled in red can change the depth and the side entrance
 

Attachments

  • Immagine.webp
    Immagine.webp
    152 KB · Views: 89
I'm trying and trying to change the parameters but I still got nothing decent........ rs4 would you put your example here so that I can take a look at them?? ?
 
I have something like this but it doesn't work as it should and so I have to play a little fancy.
Hello and thank you.
 
Bye-bye. .

does not make me load me from error goes slow, cmq I add 2 img with 2 kinds of cutters with respective different angles different and you can understand


brake d.20 x 22.5° axial offset -2mm, offset 0.8284mm

brake d.20 x 45° axial offset -2mm, offset contour 2mm


Hi.
 

Attachments

  • con 2 frese.webp
    con 2 frese.webp
    131.7 KB · Views: 45
then boys are all firm strength with proposals

pro\e nx are missing at the topsolod.........I'm curious

;)
 
I'm trying and trying to change the parameters but I still got nothing decent........ rs4 would you put your example here so that I can take a look at them?? ?
stagia used with catia v5

Hi.
 

Attachments

  • strategia.webp
    strategia.webp
    67.6 KB · Views: 71
Here's another example... in these catechisms, he's got remarkable sins (maybe it's my fault). .
This is the opening work, that is, you pass with a spherical cut of a certain diameter in a channel to free it from the supermetal, in this way the mills then pass through those canals do not find too much overmetal to work.... .
as you can see from the catia image performs the processing by making numerous ridges and following strange trajectories....... Unlike tebis, where these trajectories can be changed and where it is also possible to create new ones, catia is very rigid and allows to do very little...
How do other software behave?? ?
 

Attachments

  • Immagine2.webp
    Immagine2.webp
    74.9 KB · Views: 85
  • Part71.rar
    Part71.rar
    94.8 KB · Views: 23
Here's another example... in these catechisms, he's got remarkable sins (maybe it's my fault). .
This is the opening work, that is, you pass with a spherical cut of a certain diameter in a channel to free it from the supermetal, in this way the mills then pass through those canals do not find too much overmetal to work.... .
as you can see from the catia image performs the processing by making numerous ridges and following strange trajectories....... Unlike Tebis, where these trajectories can be changed and where it is also possible to create new ones, catia is very rigid and allows to do very little...
How do other software behave?? ?
Hello

you show us with tebis if possible

:finger:
 
I don't have tebis but in the other place they use it......... for bitangances I saw doing crazy things... it is possible to speed up the work in an impressive way. ....
You should ask someone who uses it but here the competition latita
 
Sorry I'm late.

clear opening function without lifting a processing

wanted tebis ........................


Where are you?
 

Attachments

  • apricanale.webp
    apricanale.webp
    80.9 KB · Views: 73
after the apricanal the internal processing and total past

op 1 + op 2 + op 3


Hi.
 

Attachments

  • fresatura.webp
    fresatura.webp
    59.8 KB · Views: 51
  • risultato demo.webp
    risultato demo.webp
    26.8 KB · Views: 49
  • totale.webp
    totale.webp
    248.2 KB · Views: 53
Here's another example... in these catechisms, he's got remarkable sins (maybe it's my fault). .
This is the opening work, that is, you pass with a spherical cut of a certain diameter in a channel to free it from the supermetal, in this way the mills then pass through those canals do not find too much overmetal to work.... .
as you can see from the catia image performs the processing by making numerous ridges and following strange trajectories....... Unlike tebis, where these trajectories can be changed and where it is also possible to create new ones, catia is very rigid and allows to do very little...
How do other software behave?? ?
Hello

catia v5 and a complete cam I who has been using it for 6 years I have been able to make it always do everything, it is very complex because the cam has a lot of modules and every module and full of options both fast and slow then I had the luck to follow it from the r7 and I could follow all the development phases of the same and and improved in release in release

Hi.
 
software is visicam.
What do you mean by changing lines?
I try to explain myself better than I can....... Imagine having a single channel to be resumed.... Imagine that the section is not perfectly constant oopures, as often happens, imagine that importing the various surfaces there are errors (small imperfections) of union....... if you ask caia to perform the processing it could jump out a tool path at times (imagine a dotted line).
with tebis even if this happens you could join these lines obtaining a single path.
the advantage of this possibility is that you do not have any releases and attacks that make you waste time.....
In addition, the search for where to go to catch (at least I know) is only automatic while in tebis it can also be manulae, i.e. if a caty area "does not see it" with tebis you could go to select it manually
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top