• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

change share with <rigenera modello=""> dynamic: possible?</rigenera>

  • Thread starter Thread starter reggio
  • Start date Start date

reggio

Guest
Bye to all,
I imagine that you understand anyone to work on a part together and have to change it by comparing it to a measure perhaps with another part as in the example.
normally you click on the quota and change the number if you already know the desired size, or use the darts next to the quota to change it of 10 in 10 (or the step you have set), at this point if I want to see graphically where I arrive with that measure I must press the semaphore "regenerates the model with the current value" ...

would be convenient (but also logical) if you could have upgraded to each measurement change: Is there an option I don't know to tick or know a trick to do this?
 

Attachments

  • rigenera dinamico.webp
    rigenera dinamico.webp
    36.1 KB · Views: 12
Bye to all,
I imagine that you understand anyone to work on a part together and have to change it by comparing it to a measure perhaps with another part as in the example.
normally you click on the quota and change the number if you already know the desired size, or use the darts next to the quota to change it of 10 in 10 (or the step you have set), at this point if I want to see graphically where I arrive with that measure I must press the semaphore "regenerates the model with the current value" ...

would be convenient (but also logical) if you could have upgraded to each measurement change: Is there an option I don't know to tick or know a trick to do this?
Would you like every slight change to make an automatic reconstruction? .... if you want to avoid crushing the traffic light you can always use the fast keyboard command ctrl-q or b ^^^^^
 
would be convenient (but also logical) if you could have upgraded to each measurement change: Is there an option I don't know to tick or know a trick to do this?
would be even more comfortable to use Good the cad you have at your disposal, instead of complaining about it all the time...:rolleyes:
activate instant3d, then do a clik on the function to change and you will see that you will see the sie odds of the sketch that of the function. Try dragging the blue balls to the end of the odds. try also to move the arrows and tarts that appear on the faces or on the edges where you make clik.
Magic! :smile:

Son, repent! study and repent! :bekle:redface:
If these things I know that I use the cad for 5% of my working hours, you who dump us all day should go like a rocket and above all come to explain to me.
But take into account that you are in front of a pc, not at hal9000.. .
 
would be even more comfortable to use Good the cad you have at your disposal, instead of complaining about it all the time...:rolleyes:
activate instant3d, then do a clik on the function to change and you will see that you will see the sie odds of the sketch that of the function. Try dragging the blue balls to the end of the odds. try also to move the arrows and tarts that appear on the faces or on the edges where you make clik.
Magic! :smile:

Son, repent! study and repent! :bekle:redface:
If these things I know that I use the cad for 5% of my working hours, you who dump us all day should go like a rocket and above all come to explain to me.
But take into account that you are in front of a pc, not at hal9000.. .
snapshot 3d does not exactly what he asks, the changes he does (in part only by dragging and not changing the quota directly, obviously you have to know how to adapt)
 
snapshot 3d does not exactly what he asks
The problem is exactly that "exactly."
he first decides how to use a command, then pisses off because there is not the right flag

the changes it makes in the part only dragging and not changing the quota directly, of course you have to know how to adapt)
But these are menaced.
reggio needs to dimension a part first by dragging it close to the rest of the geometry, and then define a precise quota. this with instant 3d you do it perfectly: drags (and see the new value changing), value to the eye, impose the precise value.
Then I repeat, if one wants hal9000... he's wrong film:smile:
 
But these are menaced.
reggio needs to dimension a part first by dragging it close to the rest of the geometry, and then define a precise quota. this with instant 3d you do it perfectly: drags (and see the new value changing), value to the eye, impose the precise value.
Then I repeat, if one wants hal9000... he's wrong film:smile:
I agree with you... But snapshot 3d does not do what you say in the environment together (unless you do not change part) or multibody jobs, you have to know how to adapt to commands, and make a reconstruction or change part to drag, I do not see a great difference. . .
 
pulled for the jacket, here I am to defend the so-called inv. Reggio is right in saying that inv update it immediately. It is not said that it is good but it is so. when I used swx2009 I didn't regret the update that just give it a comfortable key combinations and you do it on the fly, as the selection that in in inv you permtette to select subassieme - part-working-skirt directmetne in the big set and change a processing, quota or other directmetne from there without having to open and then close the model, this already in 2006 that I have.
Bye!
ps: marcof: I knew how much I thought of you "without stucco... mammalucco!" :-)
 
I agree with you... But snapshot 3d does not do what you say in the environment together (unless you do not change part) or multibody jobs, you have to know how to adapt to commands, and make a reconstruction or change part to drag, I do not see a great difference. . .
I assumed that entering into change part was not a tragedy, since from time to time you can change part to change to flight without first regenerating. I set up a keyboard shortcut and practically don't even notice if I'm in the environment together or part.
if you need an immediate and eye evaluation, to be refined after with precision, I think at the moment to change part with instant 3d activated is the best way, especially because you have everything available for editing, sketch odds and feature.

I add that instant3d I use it little, and mainly in the cases we are talking about

then, of course, as in everything, there are margins of improvement but a little mental elasticity always helps
 
pulled for the jacket, here I am to defend the so-called inv. Reggio is right in saying that inv update it immediately. It is not said that it is good but it is so. when I used swx2009 I didn't regret the update that just give it a comfortable key combinations and you do it on the fly, as the selection that in in inv you permtette to select subassieme - part-working-skirt directmetne in the big set and change a processing, quota or other directmetne from there without having to open and then close the model, this already in 2006 that I have.
Bye!
ps: marcof: I knew how much I thought of you "without stucco... mammalucco!" :-)
look you can do everything you wrote in solidworks or.o
 
I assumed that entering into change part was not a tragedy, since from time to time you can change part to change to flight without first regenerating. I set up a keyboard shortcut and practically don't even notice if I'm in the environment together or part.
if you need an immediate and eye evaluation, to be refined after with precision, I think at the moment to change part with instant 3d activated is the best way, especially because you have everything available for editing, sketch odds and feature.

I add that instant3d I use it little, and mainly in the cases we are talking about

then, of course, as in everything, there are margins of improvement but a little mental elasticity always helps
I am very elastic mentally, it was only to give details so that you could give an idea of the various solutions:biggrin:
 
look you can do everything you wrote in solidworks or.o
in 2009 there was no filtered selection for processing, which then in many cases selecting the object in the right place gave you the quotas already of the right processing ok, but that type of inv selection in many cases is convenient.
but then inv did not have the filtered selsion for faces or edges to e.g., in the end ognuon has its strength and weakness, it always depends what you do when you work and how approaches.
Marcof said:
vacabioa look who you see in these lande! Welcome back, I hope not annually
bah, chi può dirlo!
;-
 
Would you like every slight change to make an automatic reconstruction?
:p r or p r i or how it happens when changing the coupling quota: change size, change position eh... (it also does without hal9000 and without requiring the pressure of nothing or qlc tax code or an informed consent. . . )
if you want to avoid crushing the traffic lights you can always use the fast keyboard command ctrl-q or b ^^^
so much it can press the lighter...
would be even more comfortable to use Good the cad that you have available
..ah. You say well, but you haven't come to see me yet. . What's your 5%? :wink:
activate instant3d... magic!
It's not magic is approximation...
you who put us all day
for my luck only 5 min per day... But every time he can make me cash out. . .
I didn't find any immediate solution.http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=20273&highlight=aggiornamento...I keep the instant 3d disabled.
and then now you use "ctrl+q" or have you returned to yourself?

Ah... they tell me from the direction that in truth in 2012, the programmer that swx assumed to part-time would have had to put the same mechanism also in "quote".... then the lunch break took, did not do in time and started the burning so... it starts again in 2013 :wink:
 
marcof said:
activate instant3d... magic!
Reggio said:
It's not magic is approximation...
and why would it be approximation? you have Face snap of the surrounding geometry. if you move with the cursor on the ruler you have the snap to the ruler units that changes depending on the zoom level you have on the part. What a bitch you are!
I miss where you find all this less precision from changing with arrows the value in the quota dialog box.
if you don't want to use it for a matter of principle for me is indifferent, but you don't have to find more complications than there are.
marcof said:
You're the one who put us all day. .
Reggio said:
for my luck only 5 min per day... But every time he can make me cash out. . .
Maybe that's the problem.
 
:p r or p r i or how it happens when changing the coupling quota: change size, change position eh... (it also does without hal9000 and without requiring the pressure of nothing or qlc tax code or an informed consent. . . )


so much it can press the lighter...


..ah. You say well, but you haven't come to see me yet. . What's your 5%? :wink:


It's not magic is approximation...


for my luck only 5 min per day... But every time he can make me cash out. . .


and then now you use "ctrl+q" or have you returned to yourself?

Ah... they tell me from the direction that in truth in 2012, the programmer that swx assumed to part-time would have had to put the same mechanism also in "quote".... then the lunch break took, did not do in time and started the burning so... it starts again in 2013 :wink:
vabbè, reggio, non essere disfattista, if it is true that you use swx occasionally
It's natural that you have problems.
the ctrl-q I do it automatically, the crtl-b (okkio... in change part, within a set, does not work, you need to ctrl-b... Then don't say that I didn't tell you :tongue:...) I do it routinely at every change, damn fingers are already on the keyboard it costs nothing to do.
I also use very much ctrl-s every 2-3 minutes and when you take the hand jobs
with automatisms that you act unconsciously.

I use swx all the holy days, for 8 and a half hours, and if only I had had one per thousand of your problems I would already be in the asylum.. .

if you really don't find yourself/you well, throw swx and use what suits you most.
I wouldn't change it for the world at all. then you know, de gustobus.. .
Hello Reggio... Good Easter:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top