clarifications for purchase.

[Marcogeo]

I have noticed that, sometimes, in the characteristic points where more walls are grafted (especially if of different thicknesses and/or characteristics) it happens that in the various views the wall node (in the upper part) is affected by lines of conjunction between the various elements that "sport" the design. I wondered that priority elements have vw in the murals and how to avoid the presence of these lines.

 

[Marcogeo]

What is the flyover tool?

 

[Marcogeo]

other thing. how to build a ladder to l (but also other forms) when it is to lean on two walls and these are not to 90°?? and when do you have to deal with irregularly shaped (capilarghi) landings? should two separate ramps be built and possibly use an unassisted construction using the floors?

 

[Marcogeo]

other thing. how to build a ladder to l (but also other forms) when it is to lean on two walls and these are not to 90°?? and when do you have to deal with irregularly shaped (capilarghi) landings? should two separate ramps be built and possibly use an unassisted construction using the floors?

 

[Marcogeo]

I was trying to make the top of an external wall (coss a staircase with two landings). I create the profile of the piece (say a u overthrow to simplify) which should stand on the wall. but when I extrude, I can't transmit the values at altitude, so I create the flat figure.
I know I explained to myself as a dog but... can you help me?

 

[Marcogeo]

what is the quickest and most correct procedure to achieve the masonry parapet of a scale?

 

[lory.b]

what is the quickest and most correct procedure to achieve the masonry parapet of a scale?

for a masonry parapet I use the wall
I do.

 

[lory.b]

I have noticed that, sometimes, in the characteristic points where more walls are grafted (especially if of different thicknesses and/or characteristics) it happens that in the various views the wall node (in the upper part) is affected by lines of conjunction between the various elements that "sport" the design.

In these cases, at the junction point I insert a pillar that solves the thing.
I do.

 

[lory.b]

What is the flyover tool?

mh... now I look for it on the manual ita... I think it's in the 3d
I do.

 

[lory.b]

other thing. how to build a ladder to l (but also other forms) when it is to lean on two walls and these are not to 90°?? and when do you have to deal with irregularly shaped (capilarghi) landings? should two separate ramps be built and possibly use an unassisted construction using the floors?

Unfortunately, starlogic is still a little rigid. in fact I keep using the old parametric scales of vw that are much more configurable.
but in your case, not having other options, you should build separate ramps, interspersed with landings obtained with the loft.
I do.

 

[Marcogeo]

for a masonry parapet I use the wall
I do.

So use the wall that you're going to model in 3d, right? I don't think I've seen functions so the plant changes the height of the wall or gives it a slope. correct me if I'm wrong!

 

[Marcogeo]

In these cases, at the junction point I insert a pillar that solves the thing.
I do.

I mean? build a pillar of what size? that of the "quadrilateral" (typically square) that forms between the walls is thicker or more?

 

[Marcogeo]

Unfortunately, starlogic is still a little rigid. in fact I keep using the old parametric scales of vw that are much more configurable.
but in your case, not having other options, you should build separate ramps, interspersed with landings obtained with the loft.
I do.

old parametric scales? What's wrong with me?

 

[Marcogeo]

I forgot, yesterday I sent the order for the software, if everything is ok, I will start 2010 with a renewed momentum of optimism and a new method of work! we hope to have made the right choice!

 

[lory.b]

So use the wall that you're going to model in 3d, right? I don't think I've seen functions so the plant changes the height of the wall or gives it a slope. correct me if I'm wrong!

the wall you can draw it both in plant and in isometric view. then with the tool for modifying objects 3d gives it the slope.

 

[lory.b]

I mean? build a pillar of what size? that of the "quadrilateral" (typically square) that forms between the walls is thicker or more?

depends on the needs, however yes, it is usually a form coincident with the heads of the walls.

 

[lory.b]

old parametric scales? What's wrong with me?

The null. Avrai Stairlogic.

 

[lory.b]

I forgot, yesterday I sent the order for the software, if everything is ok, I will start 2010 with a renewed momentum of optimism and a new method of work! we hope to have made the right choice!

I'm apart, of course.
but I assure you that all those who have worked in this study, even after leaving have remained on vw (working needs permitting).
I'm sure you'll find yourself well once you've taken our confidence.
I do.

 

[Marcogeo]

The null. Avrai Stairlogic.

I understood, I returned to "home" too late to have the internal tool that could have done to my case!!! vabbhé ... will continue to comporle as I already do with domuscad!:tongue:

 

[Marcogeo]

The null. Avrai Stairlogic.

I understood, I returned to "home" too late to have the internal tool that could have done to my case!!! vabbhé ... will continue to comporle as I already do with domuscad!:tongue:

Anyway, I don't think I'm gonna be okay. the potential there are all. For example, I do not know how it is currently archicad and not how it is, if it always exists, dcad vectorspace, but the last approaches I had with those programs had always left me a sense of latent dissatisfaction, especially archicad! the impression that I have had of vw is that you can really make a complete project that at the same time can bring us advanced functions for the performance of those complements to the elaborate graphics (computi, relationships, tables, legends, etc.) that are necessary to make a complete and well done project. the having to work externally to the program, having to obtain data from post-process measurements, often can ingenerate errors of forgetfulness or transcription ... this risk will be minimized even considering that (if it works as domuscad) perhaps there will be excess measurement rather than defects.

Since there are two more questions.

when creating electronic sheets with elements data (e.g. square meters. and/or mc of walls, floors, etc.) how does vw calculate them? For example, domus cad also takes into account the wall heads that coincide (think of a corner where the head of a wall coincides with the wall of the other wall) so it always calculates something more if, for example, we talk about plasters. in this regard, for this type of count (muro, plaster, painting) is it advisable to work with the composite walls or with the simple walls and attribute the various characteristics differently (as long as it exists)?

Moreover, I did not succeed (I must 2008) to realize a niche in the walls. Is there a tool or procedure?

Finally, I saw that on the question of the top (or cover of the wall or I don't know it is called outside my area) no answer has come. Have I been so unclear? for me it is an important aspect to realize that particular. with domuscad I became mad to execute it correctly, I hope that vw is more practical and fast. help me!