clarifications for purchase.

[Marcogeo]

Meanwhile thank you for the answer and good year.
1 - since I have artlantis and I feel good I would like to continue using it. makeworks, as you know, I took it to manage the various "faces" that I couldn't handle otherwise. comuqnue I will also try rw to see what results it offers. Maybe it satisfies me;
2 - understood;
3.

I did not open further discussion because it evolved like this, on the cask and answer with lory.b. However, since I wanted to deal with pre-purchase clarifications, it was quite obvious that I would not treat a single subject but a series of curiosities and operating modes.
as soon as I have available the program I will pass to more specific questions in specific threads if the case will be used. I also chose to do so to sum up so many of the doubts that a normal user can be faced before purchase.

 

[lory.b]

about rendering and artlantis.
1- in vw is it better to set the elements with the textures provided or to differentiate only for colors and give the textures in artlantis?
2- Realizing the model with the textures in vw, when I carry it in artlantis I lose the characteristics of the texture or the display will be the same even after the exportazone?
3- Does file heaviness change something between textures and color attributes?

Hi.
I also use artlantis for rendering, for issues of time mainly. I have the habit of exporting by classes/categories and assigning textures directly to artlantis. Although, in order to have a global view of the 3d model and verify its operation, it attaches textures in vw. However, in my case, the export weight is due to the size and complexity of the model.
I do.