oliofrusto
Guest
I do not say that the university is useless, but I say that it could be carried out in a much better way by integrating theory to practical applications at firms in the area, or serious laboratories like in germany or Swiss precisely.
try asking a three-year graduate to perform engine sizing to move a tool machine... I was not able and I learned (for simple machines) during the internship, not thanks to the university.
other college comrades, for example, told me that during the interviews the examiner asked several questions like:
because in a hydraulic press I have the hydraulic pistons of greater section that work for compression of the press and those of retraction of the press with less section ? he did not know, I yes because I am passionate and because I worked as self-parator.
asked him where a screw breaks if you reach maximum tensile stress? he did not know, I would have known thanks to the reasoning and the work of self-parator that I have done.
I could do many more examples.
in the second company in fact had a graduate engineer with 5 years master, taken in test for 3 months and left at home for total inability to reason. . . among the many wrong things saw that on the design there was a 5 mm hole then ordered a m5 fitting (also quite expensive) without considering that the 5 mm hole wants a m6 thread.
I know these things thanks to the self-parator work.
Then maybe he'll leave me home, too, but on those things a little experience I have.
manual drawings are safe for small pieces and fast realization, but then they go side by side with a software system or it becomes difficult to catalog them... especially after several years, to replicate a particular car that is located hundreds of km.
in any case I have not criticized the way to work of this excellent technician.
try asking a three-year graduate to perform engine sizing to move a tool machine... I was not able and I learned (for simple machines) during the internship, not thanks to the university.
other college comrades, for example, told me that during the interviews the examiner asked several questions like:
because in a hydraulic press I have the hydraulic pistons of greater section that work for compression of the press and those of retraction of the press with less section ? he did not know, I yes because I am passionate and because I worked as self-parator.
asked him where a screw breaks if you reach maximum tensile stress? he did not know, I would have known thanks to the reasoning and the work of self-parator that I have done.
I could do many more examples.
in the second company in fact had a graduate engineer with 5 years master, taken in test for 3 months and left at home for total inability to reason. . . among the many wrong things saw that on the design there was a 5 mm hole then ordered a m5 fitting (also quite expensive) without considering that the 5 mm hole wants a m6 thread.
I know these things thanks to the self-parator work.
Then maybe he'll leave me home, too, but on those things a little experience I have.
manual drawings are safe for small pieces and fast realization, but then they go side by side with a software system or it becomes difficult to catalog them... especially after several years, to replicate a particular car that is located hundreds of km.
in any case I have not criticized the way to work of this excellent technician.