component commercial configurations

[Dani_88]

hi to everyone, I tried to spulciate all the forum but unfortunately I did not find an answer to my doubt.

for work, I find myself very often to have to compose of transport lines constituted by different extruded in commercial aluminum (identified by a commercial acronym that must remain such and not by a drawing code) and therefore in the library I find the same code with n-exime configurations extrusion (the profiles can obviously have the most different lengths).

Is there a practical way to avoid overweighting a part with extrusion configurations while avoiding copying the commercial profile in the folder for each contract?

Consider that I cannot change the part code and I would always like to stay in the shared library with ut

Thank you!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

using it as a welding profile.
in practice use profile to make structural elements

 

[Dani_88]

using it as a welding profile.
in practice use profile to make structural elements

Thanks! I can point to a different folder of the default weldment profile I imagine

 

[Dum]

using it as a welding profile.
in practice use profile to make structural elements

Hi.
I'm sorry, but I have my brain in quarantine at this time.
Maybe I didn't understand the request well, so I can't understand the difference that would be using your method.
must still be a configured file.

If you want a unique code, without configuration, I think it's difficult.
Does it mean having x projects aiming at that file, which does not have configurations and that everyone opens and shortens/ stretches at will?
the axieme loads the last saved version if there are no configurations. .
It means that if the last one created a 200mm profile and I had used one to 1000, I'm charged with the 200..

But, I repeat, perhaps I did not understand the focus of the discussion well.
:

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Thanks! I can point to a different folder of the default weldment profile I imagine

no the folder must always be that one, but create a dedicated subfolder.

dum, library files can be configured or not.
Once the structural element is created, this is unrelated to the profile and is therefore not referred to. If you create a 200-long structural element, it will always remain 200.
code, example a90-123, insert it into the properties of the sldlfp profile

 

[Dum]

no the folder must always be that one, but create a dedicated subfolder.

dum, library files can be configured or not.
Once the structural element is created, this is unrelated to the profile and is therefore not referred to. If you create a 200-long structural element, it will always remain 200.
code, example a90-123, insert it into the properties of the sldlfp profile

Yeah, okay, that's right.
and here comes the fact that perhaps I did not understand the question
he would like a unique file to hold in the library and not have to load all the time in the project folder.
but by doing so, it will still have a file for each measure.
you will find x files with x different sizes with the same name, each located in the various folders where it is used.
I'm not sure how much there can be of gain to not have a single configured file.
unless the differences between the lengths of the various conveyors are in the order of 10mm per time.. :

but maybe I don't understand. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if you have a single file with different configurations in the separate materials, you must however recall the configuration specifications and not the file name.
with the files managed by structural element recall the profile properties and not the file name.
to not have dozens of files part, with each its unique name of course, you can generate the file directly in the axieme and make it virtual and you will think solid to give it the unique name.
we say that the situation is not simple white or black and should be analyzed well in all its implications

 

[Dum]

Yes, the roads are multiple, depending on how it is actually managed.

my thought is mistranslated by a very similar situation, of my client who recalled (also for transporters) the usual aluminum profile on the overall and in the workshop they went to read the length on the overall and consequently cut.
but were still the prehistoric times of drawings in 2d on clay tablets and distinct hand-written bases.. :


to have a unique file though, to date the only thing that comes to mind is that of the configured file.
where in the configuration properties you have to, as you say, edit one by one of the various voices, putting in the options "different materials" the check on "configuration name" , to make a stupid exampleit will be that lately with sti virtual components it is turning me wrong, but I would keep it as last option.
:

 

[320i S]

It would suffice for the profile code to be as "the raw material code" or "grain code", then all possible strategies can be used (from the encoding of the single piece, structural element, configured part etc.) and then it is enough to recall that as an additional feature in the bom.

 

[Dani_88]

if you have a single file with different configurations in the separate materials, you must however recall the configuration specifications and not the file name.
with the files managed by structural element recall the profile properties and not the file name.
to not have dozens of files part, with each its unique name of course, you can generate the file directly in the axieme and make it virtual and you will think solid to give it the unique name.
we say that the situation is not simple white or black and should be analyzed well in all its implications

the following files:
in which I find a huge amount of chain scoring profiles (depending on the size of the conveyor) and profiles used for the bases (with different sizes).

with all these profiles I have to mount such transports:
if I used the structural elements, how could I handle lengths greater than 3 meters (trave limit)? If I had a straight path along 11 mt, how could I assign the cuts?

are quite fought on the best methodology to be adopted for this field.. .

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Do you know what a side file with structural element is?
Do you know what a multibody part file is?

 

[Dani_88]

Do you know what a side file with structural element is?
Do you know what a multibody part file is?

the first part created using the "structural element" function from the welding voice. . But so I would have a file with a commercial name (the name must always remain ff1 for example).

the second is when you save a set as part for example

I hope I was promoted :0

in case, happy to be correct!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

But so I would have a file with a commercial name

the file would have the name you give him. rotaia1 for example.

the second is when you save a set as part for example

absolute eno.
multibody part files are modeled as such; all the way of your chain guides you can do it in one part file where each driving section has the profile properties.

we enter the specific:
how do you manage the various driving traits?
Do you make a difference?
If yes, do a separate piece? Do you stand apart for meters?

attach a typical profile in step format and see if later I can make an example of hypercourse

 

[Dani_88]

the file would have the name you give him. rotaia1 for example.

absolute eno.
multibody part files are modeled as such; all the way of your chain guides you can do it in one part file where each driving section has the profile properties.

we enter the specific:
how do you manage the various driving traits?
Do you make a difference?
If yes, do a separate piece? Do you stand apart for meters?

attach a typical profile in step format and see if later I can make an example of hypercourse

i attach you both a commercial curve (fmbh 45r160) that you have to couple to a profile path (fmcb3)...in addition then the products must be contained sideways by a third commercial profile (flrs3x15) covered by a commercial profile in polyethylene (flrt 3x33d), but we see the concept.

so as you see the options are multiple and so far everything has been managed with configurations, but I do not know if it is the best and most efficient method. . .

I make a distinction for total meters and specific cuts in the table (I prefer not to have a thousand bubbles of the different configurations, I think more immediate the direct quotation)


I look forward to yours thank you, of course!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

an example made very quickly.
with the latest versions of dsolid you also have the total length of the profile without doversela calculate

 

[Dani_88]

an example made very quickly.
with the latest versions of dsolid you also have the total length of the profile without doversela calculate

First of all I thank you, it was as I imagined but I would have at this point two questions:

1) fmbh code 45 r160, is a commercial that must be displayed as it is and does not have configurations, so I should insert it into the path part you created and possibly continue with the path? can there be some commercial parts along the line, should I leave empty spaces to be completed in the axieme?
2) with regard to the final distinction, would the "guide" part be displayed with the re-entry relating to the development of the transport, can't you see only the recesses as if they were a part?
excuse me for questions, but I still can't figure out how to make the structural elements live together in one part (to avoid creating configurations for elements that have different extrusions and therefore configurations) and unique commercial elements

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

for the commercial parts, drawing the path, which you can also do at the same time within the axieme, draw the length of the inline construction tract as I did in the example.

for the distinct:
if you want to have a unique row do not reentry, but you can recall a property of the part that returns the code of the ptophile

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I'll add you an example of a set.
in the part file you see that I managed the distance of the guides by drawing the wheel's commercial footprint.
the distinction is set to reentry but without the detailed check so it shows only the generic profile; then I hid the line of the side file

 

[Dani_88]

I'll add you an example of a set.
in the part file you see that I managed the distance of the guides by drawing the wheel's commercial footprint.
the distinction is set to reentry but without the detailed check so it shows only the generic profile; then I hid the line of the side file

perfect very clear! then inside the same file part "guides" I can possibly add additional structural elements that need to follow the profile of the main beam (eg: side containment guides)
I would say it is an infinitely better solution than the classic functions and couplings (at least for my case)

Thanks again now I will only have to create more weldment libraries

 

[Dani_88]

I'll add you an example of a set.
in the part file you see that I managed the distance of the guides by drawing the wheel's commercial footprint.
the distinction is set to reentry but without the detailed check so it shows only the generic profile; then I hid the line of the side file

Bye!

Only one question, how do I make sure that in the separate, creating a weldment path, obviously removing the check on detailed cut and hiding the part line, appears a voice on the column "number part" in correspondence of the chosen structural profile. I don't want to leave her empty.

Do I have to force it manually?

Thank you!

sent by my mi 9t pro using tapatalk