da sw 2011 a sw 2008

[xxfast]

Sorry, but I never happened. . .
if I create parts with sw 2011 then I can open them from another pc with sw 2008

 

[meccanicamg]

No! compatibility is open a file created with prehistoric version with future version program. not the opposite.

 

[re_solidworks]

Sorry, but I never happened. . .
if I create parts with sw 2011 then I can open them from another pc with sw 2008

No! compatibility is open a file created with prehistoric version with future version program. not the opposite.

you can not do with any parametric cad3d on the market.

 

[xxfast]

I figured.
and then nothing to do.

 

[sampom]

... and now they know also the stones:biggrin:

greetings
Marco:smile:

 

[xxfast]

I wanted to be sure.
with autocad 2011, for example, I can save the file in the previous version and then open it with the older version.

 

[re_solidworks]

I wanted to be sure.
with autocad 2011, for example, I can save the file in the previous version and then open it with the older version.

in fact it is not a 3d parametric

 

[xxfast]

But if I save in .step or :iges and then open with sw I should also find the functions?

 

[sampom]

But if I save in .step or :iges and then open with sw I should also find the functions?

and no, maybe.:biggrin:
you have "imported races" without history functions etc., "mothers", end to yourself.
if it was a joint neither constraints and relationships, all mobile bodies.

However, if you save and reopen in different versions of swx use the parasolid that is its kernel. should possibly be easier to recognize bodies, surfaces and "some" function with the appropriate utility.
iges no absolutely, is what gives more problems (then it is more dedicated to surfaces).

greetings
Mar

p.s. and we no longer compare with autocad, are 2 worlds completely different. using both of them you should know.
and if you do a search back in the forum you will find hundreds of threads on the topic "Save back" and retrocompatibility.. I was saying that the stones also know it (besides it is well explained in the first paragraphs of the guide/presentation of the program).

 

[marcof]

But if I save in .step or :iges and then open with sw I should also find the functions?

try to save a cube in step, reopen it with swx and check so alone how much you ask seems too difficult?

 

[xxfast]

and no, maybe.:biggrin:
you have "imported races" without history functions etc., "mothers", end to yourself.
if it was a joint neither constraints and relationships, all mobile bodies.

However, if you save and reopen in different versions of swx use the parasolid that is its kernel. should possibly be easier to recognize bodies, surfaces and "some" function with the appropriate utility.
iges no absolutely, is what gives more problems (then it is more dedicated to surfaces).

greetings
Mar

p.s. and we no longer compare with autocad, are 2 worlds completely different. using both of them you should know.
and if you do a search back in the forum you will find hundreds of threads on the topic "Save back" and retrocompatibility.. I was saying that the stones also know it (besides it is well explained in the first paragraphs of the guide/presentation of the program).

Okay, I get it.
I didn't think to look for in the "back uplift" forum. I tried to search with other words but I didn't find anything.
Thanks anyway. :wink: