different materiale

[sofa80]

hello to all
Perhaps my question is trivial, I searched the forum without finding any feedback:
in a multi body part because in distinct visualization only 1 article? ?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

because in part multibody is used the separate cut.
if you have to use the separate materials you have to set it as a recess

 

[sofa80]

I tried to understand but I couldn't:

..because in part multibody is used the separate cut. .

to activate the separate cut I should work with welding
I also can't click on the reentry check

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

to make a distinction of a multibody you must have inside the part a distinct cut because only if this is present you can define the individual bodies. Otherwise it is not possible; In fact in the design environment the separate cut will be inhibited what will be the re-entry of the distinct materials.
to separate the cut in the part it is sufficient to make insert>saldature>salda. will appear the weldement function and the resulting separate cut. to popular the separate cut with the properties to fill you can do it by clicking with the button destreo on weldement and then adding the desired properties

 

[sofa80]

Thank you so much
all clear

 

[asblo]

Hello everyone
I am referring to one of the various discussions where we are talking about distinct.
is it possible to treat the bodies of a part in a distinct material like parts?
example. I have a pippo set that contains parts a, b and c. the part c is a multibody part that contains bodies 1, 2 and 3, I use only as "skeleton", are the bodies that interest me.
I want the distinct materials of the pip axieme to be composed of:
- Yes.
-B
-1
-2
-3
I hope I've explained

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I don't think it's possible if you don't set the rebound and hide lines that you don't want to see. quantities may be wrong.

is not the correct way of using solidworks; If you want to have separate parts, you have to do parts.

 

[asblo]

sin. would be interesting if there was a possibility

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I repeat that solidworks is not structured for lavorqrw in this way. if you feel the need and do not want to use the existing logic ask the solidworks developers an integration

 

[andrea1974]

Is that my case? I didn't understand....
I have a pip set that contains all parts plus two subaxes composed by parts.
I would like all parts to appear in the table plus only a closed subaxieme and the open atro with the parts in sight.
I don't know if I was clear.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I don't know if I was clear.

No, you're not.

 

[andrea1974]

I have a pippo set made by the bc details, plus a pluto set made by the details d and f plus a duck set composed of the details g h i.
I want in table of the main axieme pluto that appears abc + pluto + g h i

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Distinta con secondo livello selettivo

buongiorno a tutti sapete se, in una distinta d'assieme è possibile inserire il secondo livello solo per alcuni sottoassiemi? vi spiego: per comodità, nell'inserimento delle viti, ho inserito alcuni gruppi (vite+dado+rondelle) che vorrei rimanessero raggruppati all'interno dell'assieme, ma nella...

www.cad3d.it

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

If you ask the question about this discussion and answer the other how do you know if you solved it?

 

[andrea1974]

If you scatter the arguments how you gather them? You sent me back.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

look that no one scatters the discussions; are users who do not find, or not looking, discussions with the same problem open new discussions.
I have linked you a discussion with the answer to such a problem; questions are often repetitive and you cannot think that every time you have to rewrite the whole procedure.
if I link you to the discussion of another forum, give the answer in that?

 

[re_solidworks]

Hello everyone
I am referring to one of the various discussions where we are talking about distinct.
is it possible to treat the bodies of a part in a distinct material like parts?
example. I have a pippo set that contains parts a, b and c. the part c is a multibody part that contains bodies 1, 2 and 3, I use only as "skeleton", are the bodies that interest me.
I want the distinct materials of the pip axieme to be composed of:
- Yes.
-B
-1
-2
-3
I hope I've explained

I often use this method of work as a shortcut, in case of "particular" modeling. Ignore the table of the welded, in the description of the welded I write "no distinct" to understand that it must be eliminated, then in the table of together I do a little as it says massivonweizen and that is distinct with indentation, flat numbering, distinct cut detail. as soon as I put the distinct, select the lines "no distinct" and gate with a "canc". the prototype of the distinct materials is created specifically for this use and contains the properties of length and cutting angles as for the separate welding. In this way we solved some problems we had in our workflow for some particular cases and we manage to get the best of the 2 techniques together. The important thing is to understand what you are doing to manage everything as you have to.

 

[asblo]

Now I have no way to try in the immediate, but it seems to me that so the problem is that you appear in separate materials also all other macro assemblies that contain other parts. I usually use distinct materials like "only parts"

 

[re_solidworks]

Now I have no way to try in the immediate, but it seems to me that so the problem is that you appear in separate materials also all other macro assemblies that contain other parts. I usually use distinct materials like "only parts"

in your example you talk about a monolevel set with bulk parts and a welded. for this together it works exactly as I described, if the structure of assembly is different it should be evaluated randomly.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Now I have no way to try in the immediate, but it seems to me that so the problem is that you appear in separate materials also all other macro assemblies that contain other parts. I usually use distinct materials like "only parts"

The limits, which are very limited to me, are:
the difficulty of managing the quantities (if you have 2 parts with inside 3 separate bodies you will always see 3 bodies and not 6)
the management of all multibody parts (if you have 30 multibody parts and you want to see only the bodies of 1 you have to manage all the others as well and it doesn't seem to me recently)@asblo Can you please give me an example of where you need to do such an escamotage?