door with multiple hinges (2)

[Marvel]

tried....but this happens to me....practically the door remains firm and rotates the hinge, getting out of the side.... (v. attached image)

 

[Mike1967]

attached the only zipper (as I downloaded it from grabcad a few weeks ago...), hoping that there is everything....

I also ready the pack&go file, but how do I attach it? its extension is not among those allowed. Should I zip it?



made....but I'm under the mistakes....



but did you try? I've tried now, but it always gives me an ultra-definite combination error. . . .

Bye!

Mar

with solidworks you should act like you're setting that door on the mobile. hold the coincidence in height and screw the hinges at a quota that allows the door to rotate/translate in the open/closed positions. Therefore, apart from the coincidence of the attached image, you must cancel the other couplings that bind the door. I also attach a video with the couple I used.
forgives the quality of the video. [video=youtube_share;LMWhwXJFrhA]https://youtu.be/lmwhwxjfrha[/video]

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I didn't touch any existing mating. I just put the two parallels.
may be that 2013 has some mating processing problem

 

[Marvel]

Thanks mike and boulders, I try as soon as possible, hoping that what he says is not true.... then I let you know.

Bye!

m

 

[Mike1967]

I didn't touch any existing mating. I just put the two parallels.
may be that 2013 has some mating processing problem

you can't simplify it as you did, if you notice the wheel door not through the hinge but because there is the coincidence of the corners door/frame by translating the door from the hinge. I will post the file as soon as possible.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I know that rotation is not given by the hinge, as it should be. But it was to point out that without touching the existing constraints and adding those two parallelisms the movement works, what does marvel fail for a couple of months(? ? ? )
that then the parallels are due to the fact that the hinge, with the existing constraints, does not lean on the door therefore cannot be coinciding; in reality of course it is not possible such a thing, just open the mobile bar to take the beer to understand how it works.

 

[Marvel]

Massive, when I try to do as you suggest with the 2 parallels (I did one only to try) the zipper rotates as in the image of the answer #21. I really don't want sw2013 to have limits for this kind of operations. . .

Bye!

Mar

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Did you do a ctrl+q? sometimes it serves to force a reconstruction to digest commands

 

[Marvel]

made, even with ctrl+q. Now the door moves along with the hinges, I gave the 2 parallels as you said, but all these errors are generated.

Is it possible to solve?

Bye.

Mar

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Of course it is possible to solve. analyzes the couplings that overdefine the axieme and eliminate the excess ones.
First of all, instead of canceling them, you should suspend them so as to circumstate them and lastly when you came to the head of them.
if you are more comfortable create a subaxieme of the walls of the closet that is a static block; in this way the couplings of the cabinet mounting will not affect (because inside the subaxis) and you will have only the couplings of the hinges and the door to manage and analyze

 

[Mike1967]

made, even with ctrl+q. Now the door moves along with the hinges, I gave the 2 parallels as you said, but all these errors are generated.

Is it possible to solve?

Bye.

Mar

too much constraints that do the same thing, for example: the fixed part of the zipper has two concentricities when instead it would be enough to... And so on. Moreover, the basic rule, when you have flexible assemblies, some couplings conflict with each other if the same components are mounted for the same purpose. in the specific case the limit angle of the hinge 1 cannot convive with the limit angle of the zip 2, so it is appropriate to create a new configuration (in the black zipper joint) where we will go to suspend the limit angle. I have installed 2013 and attach the correct and working model, without errors.View attachment sportello.part1.rarView attachment sportello.part3.rarView attachment sportello.part2.rar

 

[Marvel]

too much constraints that do the same thing, for example: the fixed part of the zipper has two concentricities when instead it would be enough to... And so on. Moreover, the basic rule, when you have flexible assemblies, some couplings conflict with each other if the same components are mounted for the same purpose. in the specific case the limit angle of the hinge 1 cannot convive with the limit angle of the zip 2, so it is appropriate to create a new configuration (in the black zipper joint) where we will go to suspend the limit angle. I have installed 2013 and attach the correct and working model, without errors.View attachment 48530

mike thanks endless for everything!! and thanks also to mass and to those who contributed to the resolution of this (for me) problem:finger::finger:

that of the asses that have the same purpose and that go into conflict with each other I did not know it....like many others....:redface:

You want to forgive me if I made you horrify with my caxxate....:redface:

Bye!

Mar