MarcoBi
Guest
banal question. Of course, that you can do. However, you should also tell us what sw you want to do with and what you need the 3d (rendering or echoing sheets in the plane, nesting etc.)
jim78b
Guest
no I meant to do it with pure and simple autocad .the 3d serves then x facilitate the putting into the table .I make the sections and also the cuts lamiere. but with normal autocad I wonder if it is possible .I tried but you can not because the constructive and constrained by shaped tilted sheets!
Mike1967
Guest
I'm not a designer, but I'm eating sheets for breakfast and I can guarantee you
that with the 2d you can draw everything, it is only question of time.
I learned to extract the developments of the carter with cad 2d, now we use solidworks and we would never go back.
annexed one of the first works designed in 2d, was far 1999... :smile:
Attachments
jim78b
Guest
you ok except that solid works I abandoned give me the drawings in 2d in dwg so I ask if with autocad of the autodesk you can draw in 3d the piece I inserted in
maxopus
Guest
You can do it, you take 10 times the time you want but, you do.
Of course, you're doing it in your hands.
Of course, you're doing it in your hands.
jim78b
Guest
Okay except I couldn't
MarcoBi
Guest
mail the file autocad 2d...
jim78b
Guest
here is the dwg
Mike1967
Guest
but, sorry, did that design contest at the festival of incongruence??? ?
I don't understand why autocradists don't use decimals.
every time I examine a drawing executed in 2d I see things
unacceptable (parlo da metalconruttore, I am not a designer).
how can it be shorter than 308?? ?
Shouldn't 1099 be 1100?
I hate cads that allow you to edit the quota regardless of real
geometry, I find it a heresy.
attached pdf and dwg.
I just designed the main carter, take into account the generous size
of the development, it controls with the bending machine that can bend the edges so high, I doubt strongly, but I do not know the vs equipment, but maybe
holding the pz to the side of the punch once a dx and once a sx you should succeed.
You can always "shake" the figure and make it weld, anyway.
I left the corners, you should do it.
Hi.
I don't understand why autocradists don't use decimals.
every time I examine a drawing executed in 2d I see things
unacceptable (parlo da metalconruttore, I am not a designer).
how can it be shorter than 308?? ?
Shouldn't 1099 be 1100?
I hate cads that allow you to edit the quota regardless of real
geometry, I find it a heresy.
attached pdf and dwg.
I just designed the main carter, take into account the generous size
of the development, it controls with the bending machine that can bend the edges so high, I doubt strongly, but I do not know the vs equipment, but maybe
holding the pz to the side of the punch once a dx and once a sx you should succeed.
You can always "shake" the figure and make it weld, anyway.
I left the corners, you should do it.
Hi.
re_solidworks
Guest
and why did you leave him? that sheet was in a few minutes.. .
What are you? Come on, now you've entered the circle of who "was in the warm winter and cool in the summer". I understand that you have a hard time admitting it (even to me weighs this opinion:smile
but you are a dirty man like me!:biggrin:on the second part....maybe I will be raw, but some geometries you get with loft plates or with surfaces, maybe combining spline in space.... well, maybe after a year you did the first. It is not just speed, sometimes even feasibility and error reduction (in my humble opinion).
even with swx, wanting, do it.
all cads do it, including the "rigid" I create.Mike1967
Guest
Yes, the cold hot speech, okay, but look at that every once in a while when there are some particular jobs, they ask me to go to the counter... and I godo!and why did you leave him? that sheet was in a few minutes.. .
What are you? Come on, now you've entered the circle of who "was in the warm winter and cool in the summer". I understand that you have a hard time admitting it (even to me it weighs this opinion:smile
on the second part....maybe I will be raw, but some geometries you get with loft plates or with surfaces, maybe combining spline in space.... well, maybe after a year you did the first. It is not just speed, sometimes even feasibility and error reduction (in my humble opinion).
even with swx, wanting, do it.
I did not understand the other paragraph, I developed the pz with the convert in sheet metal, I put you and no 10 minutes with the table.
Maybe I didn't understand what you're talking about.
@jim78b : eye, the development I have posted is at withdrawal 0 (zero).
with the ns dies we have a withdrawal of 0.8 mm fold, then informed on this parameter.
quotas, sometimes, by obvious necessity, I also change some quotas, but I mark it with the underline. (I think it's the rule of quotas not in scale)
Hi.
jim78b
Guest
the 306 is shorter because it is seen from behind, and then that calm with the "ears" I only asked .my fault my if I am dismembered to draw with the 3d
Mike1967
Guest
Neeeee...
Come on, come on, you have to get a criticism.
a "thank you, str@nzo, for the file" you could write it. . :biggrin:
bye :finger:
jim78b
Guest
:biggrin
k "thank you," you hear that I want to practice just with autocad 3d I put my file , look it's a mess I can't make the side sheet that in addition tilted is also shaped...you have ?thanks:smile:
k "thank you," you hear that I want to practice just with autocad 3d I put my file , look it's a mess I can't make the side sheet that in addition tilted is also shaped...you have ?thanks:smile:
Last edited by a moderator:
Mike1967
Guest
... I read your msg before you edit it (announcement email)... minkia you took me to the letter! :biggrin::biggrin
Listen, I autocad do not use it, it makes me come the hive, I have always entrusted to another cad 2d smartsketch 4 of the intergraph (cad 2d exceptional, the schetch looks like that of solid edge (if I don't remember badly).
Anyway, I'll put my file tonight, take it to .dwg so you can take it.
For example.
I got the file at home. .
Bye. :finger:
jim78b
Guest
OK thank you I hope that joke against you is not taken!ok thanks nothing I wanted to know if with autocad something like that would be feasible or lends itself only to make buildings!
Mike1967
Guest
Don't worry. I will sell myself in due time...:biggrin:
I'll put the file on you tonight, both of the sheet and the solid track.
as already mentioned by others, cad 3d facilitates the task, autocad... I don't think, despite the 3d (the first 3d I used was rhino 1).
know, however, that I learned to pull out developments in 2d which meant creating various projections and views to find the correct geometry.
a huge waste of time, right now.
a parametric cad, solidworks type, solidedge etc., are priceless.
See you later.
I'll put the file on you tonight, both of the sheet and the solid track.
as already mentioned by others, cad 3d facilitates the task, autocad... I don't think, despite the 3d (the first 3d I used was rhino 1).
know, however, that I learned to pull out developments in 2d which meant creating various projections and views to find the correct geometry.
a huge waste of time, right now.
a parametric cad, solidworks type, solidedge etc., are priceless.
See you later.
jim78b
Guest
in fact autocad isuse the boolean geometry right? In fact, I think there are many functions as it is.
Mike1967
Guest
I don't know what version you have, I'll put you a xt file.
If you can't open it, maybe ask if someone can convert it to dwg format.
If you can't open it, maybe ask if someone can convert it to dwg format.