drawing together problem configurations

[MassiVonWeizen]

insert global variables into the main axieme, double click on the glass quotas, write = and call the variable

 

[space_developer]

in the axieme you will have the family table that for the model 780x550 loads the subcomponents to, b, c 780x550 which in turn will have their family table.

 

[tanticapelli]

Hello everyone
then, I deceased all the external references that were within the parts and destroyed all the equations that I had previously inserted at lower levels of the assieme father, so, if I did not forget a few pieces, the parts are parameterized only by the global variables of the main axieme.

However the design (c009-20 order glass.slddrw) continues to not want to properly recep the different configurations.

The global variables I have inserted work on "all configurations" as the glass with all its components have the only default configuration.

I send you all the package because I no longer know what fish to take.

Thank you very much

 

[space_developer]

Hello everyone
then, I deceased all the external references that were within the parts and destroyed all the equations that I had previously inserted at lower levels of the assieme father, so, if I did not forget a few pieces, the parts are parameterized only by the global variables of the main axieme.


Okay.

However the design (c009-20 order glass.slddrw) continues to not want to properly recep the different configurations.

The global variables I have inserted work on "all configurations" as the glass with all its components have the only default configuration.

if you select the view you can change the configuration

I send you all the package because I no longer know what fish to take.

Thank you very much

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

space developer, you don't understand the problem.
the design is updated only with the current configuration of the model, inserting a second view with another configuration not updated, you have to enter the model , but thus making the first view goes in bad weather.
It is not a question of data table, but of references.

 

[space_developer]

Right!
if in the 3d window I manage configurations select 1500x900
then the 2d selected the same configuration... update!
But if I open only the 2d this does not happen. . .

 

[tanticapelli]

I am saddened by this deafening silence.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I think the only one is to manage everything with configurations.
I'll give you an example

 

[tanticapelli]

Okay, I'm looking at how you did it, it seems to me to say little genius, I don't see variables or equations anywhere, easy to manage.

Now I try to transpose everything into my axiemino and see if I can...

I wanted to ask you for my curiosity that if these that I show you are standard-setting spikes or something that you have customised and especially that you benefit from these tricks.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

In the end it is nothing transcendental, I followed what was explained, or rather how I "translated" it, in the link of the post #17 and that is to use configurations even at the lower levels. And then I got a little bit to play with the graphics... so' boys
those that indicate in images are:
The data table is a remorse of an abortion attempt, I forgot to eliminate it
the clipboard.doc file is always present in all pattern files, in drawing files I have not checked; to view it you have to go to options>feature manager and put the check to visuialize attachments.

 

[tanticapelli]

ok massive, drum roll, I put hand to my axiemino and the only thing that still seems to trouble is a local repetition that obviously struggles to update as it is active indifferently on all configurations.

uploddo this version.

Now I try to dissociate the repetition so I have two real parts so I shouldn't have any more problems.

Perhaps I can think that I could also insert an ad hoc linear repetition for each configuration and maybe it would work the same but it is an idea that I like little.

 

[tanticapelli]

In the end it is nothing transcendental, I followed what was explained, or rather how I "translated" it, in the link of the post #17 and that is to use configurations even at the lower levels. And then I got a little bit to play with the graphics... so' boys

yes caspita is true, I had not read it carefully, I had not understood that in the end it went to insert configurations on all the elements (which were affected by the varying configurations of the assieme father) of all levels while not having in fact any specific function or dimensional values to match each configuration. . .

 

[tanticapelli]

Okay, put the set up, a crazy pussy!

everything works perfectly regardless of the depth of the features tree

Thanks massive, you saved me again.. .

but do you know that of two training centers that I've heard neither of them has been able to give me the answer to the flight on this problem?

I will open another post shortly to ask you a suggestion on a further refinement always on the same set: This is an advanced parameterization that I hope can be solved without the help of macros, since basic I don't know anything.

and thank you!

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Thanks massive, you saved me again.. .

No problem. So I learned something new. a lot of what I know is fruit, besides it has a morbid curiosity, also to study the problems that are placed