emptying one part with another part

[Parametric_Ozzy]

Okay, next time I'll look before I ask. .

I'm not saying anything... it's not nice to talk about the absent cmq I try to arrange to exploit the investment I made 3 years ago...

I would do the names, so they all know who to avoid, otherwise they do as always of the whole grass a bundle.

 

[maxopus]

I wouldn't have any problem accepting it as a user and as a person who has nothing to do with it.
However, Pat, these are things involving companies and talking about it in negative terms can lead to responsibility towards the forum.
With all due respect for a user I don't know, and if he had expressed a non-objective opinion?

so if you want, you can do it privately.

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

I wouldn't have any problem accepting it as a user and as a person who has nothing to do with it.
However, Pat, these are things involving companies and talking about it in negative terms can lead to responsibility towards the forum.
With all due respect for a user I don't know, and if he had expressed a non-objective opinion?

so if you want, you can do it privately.

You're right about this, the truth is always in the middle....

 

[mali_fx]

the course I did it in 2008 and, for work problems, I used the software only 3 months...
only now I have put my hands back and so I apologize if I don't remember the fundamental steps anymore! !

I entrusted myself to you (i.e. this forum) because the company that sold me the program does not answer these simple questions (although I left almost 10,000 € x software+course)

cmq I managed to create what I had to do.. .

Thanks again

Hello zetapres,
I'm sorry about your situation, it seems to see me a few years ago!
if you need more info ask without problems and above all ignore who, instead of answering questions or why not, even simply don't answer and let answer those who do it without every time polemizing, you put and reproach who is in difficulty!

 

[maxopus]

Hello zetapres,
I'm sorry about your situation, it seems to see me a few years ago!
if you need more info ask without problems and above all ignore who, instead of answering questions or why not, even simply don't answer and let answer those who do it without every time polemizing, you put and reproach who is in difficulty!

You mean me?

 

[mali_fx]

You mean me?

I'm referring to anyone who feels pulled up.

 

[maxopus]

I'm referring to anyone who feels pulled up.

if I allow myself to criticize it is because no one "perees" to do a small search or in the program guide or in the pages of this forum.
also this topic (operations with components) has been treated astounding here.
the forum now seems to be the place of responses to button, rather than the place of growth that should be.
someone asks questions because he can't use a command and others to answer.

If you have to criticize someone openly fails, without words or subtly, so you respond to to tone and without misunderstandings.

 

[DANI-3D]

Hello zetapres,
I'm sorry about your situation, it seems to see me a few years ago!

hi colleagues, since it's not common half-gaudio, I put myself in this discussion to describe my bad experience with a course held by “technicians” of the dealer of my area.
the course of the duration of a week has cost a barrel of money, fortunately paid by the company for which I worked, at the end of which we had learned, not because of us, only to use few basic commands of the modeling, a little notions on the table, the main constraints in the environment asm. the things a little more complex, like family table, parameterization, flexibility, bones etc. just mentioned because they were part of an advanced course,
the technician who did the course on sheet metal the first thing that told us was that the sheet module was not a great one and that it would be better to have bought solid edge, so we had to settle for the poor results, probably this premise had to cover its poor knowledge of matter.
telephone information was reduced to a minimum because they were aiming to repeat course days at an absurd time cost.

Unfortunately doing a course with the wrong people serves little, fortunately there is this forum where you really learn to exploit the potential of the program.

 

[mali_fx]

if I allow myself to criticize it is because no one "perees" to do a small search or in the program guide or in the pages of this forum.
also this topic (operations with components) has been treated astounding here.
the forum now seems to be the place of responses to button, rather than the place of growth that should be.
someone asks questions because he can't use a command and others to answer.

If you have to criticize someone openly fails, without words or subtly, so you respond to to tone and without misunderstandings.

I don't think I'm afraid to say it, and I always do it openly.
I agree when you say that you should try to double the discussions and it is right to make it present to those who are wrong but what I do not find right is that pountually there is who, the discussion, always makes it to end in the same way that it is to blow out figures (who knows why...) and always has the tendency to take for the ass next!.
a simple question (in this technical case) needed a purely (technical) answer.
we are more humble and stop doing phenomena

 

[mali_fx]

hi colleagues, since it's not common half-gaudio, I put myself in this discussion to describe my bad experience with a course held by “technicians” of the dealer of my area.
the course of the duration of a week has cost a barrel of money, fortunately paid by the company for which I worked, at the end of which we had learned, not because of us, only to use few basic commands of the modeling, a little notions on the table, the main constraints in the environment asm. the things a little more complex, like family table, parameterization, flexibility, bones etc. just mentioned because they were part of an advanced course,
the technician who did the course on sheet metal the first thing that told us was that the sheet module was not a great one and that it would be better to have bought solid edge, so we had to settle for the poor results, probably this premise had to cover its poor knowledge of matter.
telephone information was reduced to a minimum because they were aiming to repeat course days at an absurd time cost.

Unfortunately doing a course with the wrong people serves little, fortunately there is this forum where you really learn to exploit the potential of the program.

we were in 3 doing the basic course.
1 week after which practically no one remembered anything!
Believe me the course I did it myself to slew at night because I was working day and when you called counseling gave you dry answers, sometimes she told you she didn't understand and made you feel like a moron but thinking about it now, I know she understood but it was all a policy to blow up other days of course.. .
What time.. .

 

[maxopus]

I don't think I'm afraid to say it, and I always do it openly.
I agree when you say that you should try to double the discussions and it is right to make it present to those who are wrong but what I do not find right is that pountually there is who, the discussion, always makes it to end in the same way that it is to blow out figures (who knows why...) and always has the tendency to take for the ass next!.
a simple question (in this technical case) needed a purely (technical) answer.
we are more humble and stop doing phenomena

I didn't understand the "fresh" speech, and I didn't even understand the "fenomeni" speech.
It will be the age that I understand less and less.