fill surfaces

[gtsolid]

Hello everyoneas you see from the image I downloaded the cad of this part of skate and now I would like to fill it so as to perform subsequent fem analysis.
What command can I use? If I use "surface filling" I can't, there would be too many surfaces to impose it

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Why not attach the file?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

that then maybe just do the diagnostic or import the native file with other options

 

[gtsolid]

View attachment INAFAG_RWU45-E-L-G2-V3.rarhere, if there are no ways, I try to import the native file with other options

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

in fact just do a diagnostic and repair all faces

 

[gtsolid]

not imported diagnostics? How can I do that?

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

if you are looking for the guide you find it
or google disgnostic solidworks
I mean, try putting some of your...

 

[gtsolid]

You're right. I found it right. ok I solved thank you
One last thing, do you know how to check the minimum thickness of a surface? to verify that there are no other cases like that of the skate above

 

[LC23]

I should like to ask you here rather than open another topic.

I would like to fill the space between the two surfaces in the image, can I? If so, how?

I ask why I believe that the indication given by massivonweizen does not do to my case, if necessary, have pity


Thank you.

 

[marcof]

View attachment 43717I would like to fill the space between the two surfaces in the image, can I? If so, how?

if the edges of the surfaces are on the same floor use the command "planar surface". select the outer edges and the inner edges and the confirmation. during the selection you will appear or disappear the previews of the suiperficie depending on the possibility of creating it according to the edges until then selected; you select everything until the end and you will see the preview of the surface between the two edges.

 

[LC23]

if the edges of the surfaces are on the same floor use the command "planar surface". select the outer edges and the inner edges and the confirmation. during the selection you will appear or disappear the previews of the suiperficie depending on the possibility of creating it according to the edges until then selected; you select everything until the end and you will see the preview of the surface between the two edges.

If I understand what you mean I answer no: the object in question is composed of two empty egg shells that in the image I dissected with the appropriate command to show the inside.
I would like to make full, solid, the space between the outer shell and the inner one.

I really need everything because I have to do the solidification study of another piece formed for shell molding and I would like to create the cad model of the model plates and shells in which to school.
I haven't been able to find a way to create them for several weeks (shells and plates) and I was thinking of trying to get two offset surfaces from all over the piece, a distance for example 10 mm and a 0.01 , then filling the space interposed, dividing them along the divider plane (which among other things should be a curved surface) and thus creating the shells.

I hope to have been clear, if you have other methods to recommend I can open another discussion

 

[marcof]

If I understand what you mean I answer no: the object in question is composed of two empty egg shells that in the image I dissected with the appropriate command to show the inside.

I could not know that the image was a section of two closed surfaces: so, for the record, I tell you what I did:

1. I wasn't sure of the procedure I had in mind so I opened swx to make a test
2. I created a part like your image
3. I made the planar surface
4. I responded by describing the procedure

next time maybe you provide accurate information so you avoid waste time uselessly, I do tests on shapes other than yours, you have to rewrite a post to clarify exactly what you have for your hands and what you have to do then again I feel to find you a solution hopefully definitive.

made this premise and before giving you a false advice and lost time again I ask you: is the part symmetrical than the plan you used to sezionarla?
a force of extorting information about Yours file you will see that we will get the solution. . .

Of course, if you attach the part file, it would obviously be all simpler and wouldn't be equivocal.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Of course, if you attach the part file, it would obviously be all simpler and wouldn't be equivocal.

but so you'd lose part of the fun that it's going on. and say that you want the baby ready.. .

 

[marcof]

but so you'd lose part of the fun that it's going on. and say that you want the baby ready.. .

I sometimes like to cook it "steam"

 

[LC23]

I thought the fact that the section was active was helpful, but you are right, next time I will try to be more precise.

the part is symmetrical to the section plane used.

allego is an egg similar to what we were talking about (the original was eaten, I created it only to try to understand )
both the file on which I really have to work so maybe give me some advice

Thank you.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

What does a model have to do with each other?

anyway I models of the genus, with sketches completely subdefined, I immediately recycle them

 

[LC23]

What does a model have to do with each other?

anyway I models of the genus, with sketches completely subdefined, I immediately recycle them

I explained first what each other has to do with each other.
What do you mean by underdefinite?

You'll be a little frustrated, what do you say? are you here to help or to vent?
If you look like bad questions or not worthy of answer you would better not waste time in typing phrases.
I use plural for all those who feel taken into account.
for other peace & love

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

You didn't explain what one has to do with each other.
one (the egg) must fill the space between two surfaces, the other of which I attach image (a kind of bracket) that surfaces must fill? those 3 that are there is enough to extrude and join the body.
I mean that all sketches have no quotas or constraints. Such a model is unmanageable.
speaking for me I am not here specifically to help (it is not a help desk) but to make a contribution to the forum that can be a help, but also a council or criticism.
you, like so many other students and not, give too much for granted both on the questions you ask, as if you were behind you and you had followed the process you have in mind, and on the accompaniment to the demands.You want some advice? Here they are:
-write the version of the profile software because solidworks does not read future version files; the users of the forum lose time to download and open files that then can't read and since it's been a while following the forum you should know
design the sketches completely defined otherwise you will never be able to change them in case of need and if you have to make a similar one you will lose time uselessly
always give the file in your requests for help, except for reasons of confidentiality; deciphering a screenshot in search of the pressed button of the section means throwing away time to those who read you and re-create the model that maybe present an error in the features is not an index of recreating the problem that you dash.
If you're annoyed by the bad answers, maybe it's better if you realize that as much as I'm an asshole, I'm much less than the ones you're dealing with in the world of work.

Go to peace brother

 

[marcof]

the part is symmetrical to the section plane used.
allego is an egg similar to what we were talking about (the original was eaten, I created it only to try to understand)

the egg you have attached now is completement different from that of the first image. the first was composed of two surfaces one internal to the other, this has an external surface and an internal solid for more emptied.
I had thought of the solution to merge the two concentric surfaces, but now there is no sooner. What exactly do you want to do?

both the file on which I really have to work so maybe give me some advice

the file on the uale you have to work is a solid full. first you asked how to combine two separate surfaces to create a solid.
shows some empathy towards your neighbor and tries to understand the difficulties we encounter on this side of the web that to understand what the hell you should do

 

[marcof]

You'll be a little frustrated, what do you say? are you here to help or to vent?

This pearl had escaped me.. .
Although it can become frustrating to help people who are not able to express themselves clearly despite wanting to pursue the career of engineers or designers, we are not frustrated and we are not here to vent, so I recommend you to calm down.
In case you missed it, you're not able to make us understand your problem. you have to settle a pretty complex part and place a half egg that is not, then place another with inside the surprise (a solid cable). both of them have nothing to do with the problem.
I don't know what course of study you have behind me, but I'm wondering if you and so many other fellow students have ever done a lab report. I mean a clear, synthetic and inexplicable relationship in which anyone reading it can understand what the experience described was. those relationships, to understand, where a professor with a minimum of experimental experience gives you 8, 9 or 10. not a 3-

If you look like bad questions or not worthy of answer you would better not waste time in typing phrases.

If they are poorly placed instead we point out that they are such and you want a hand, for respect to us that we are trying to help you, you attack and the questions reform them, as once said, "from Christian".
writing a so much arm confusedly, providing partial or worse incorrect information is a lack of respect for those who are helping you and a bad business card for a technical future. mark it.
the forum is not your help desk and answers to your problems (and this to 95% of you students escape regularly) constitute the cad3d archive that will serve other users to solve an identical problem without having to reformulate the same question. lforum is not at your service, it is at your service indirect while serving everyone directly. Do you understand how a forum works now?

use plural for all those who feel taken into account

We answered you in two. use plural so I'm sued.
for me we can continue the beating to obscurity and I have no problems replenishing the dose but perhaps it is more constructive, for you, to start from zero or from the real model that must settle.

In case you want to start again like nothing happened you have to fix the model. at sketch level is completely underdefinite so it is a wandering mine ready to explode at any attempt to change. departed from the first feature pulling up the tree of history and quota as you owe all sketches until they are completely bound. made this post here the model indicating exactly what feature you cannot complete, which surface you have to join to what etc.