fill surfaces

[LucaOt]

Thank you very much for your help

 

[LucaOt]

I'll tell you something I noticed this morning: any solid goes to shape, inside remains empty. It was not a step problem but a problem of some setting that I accidentally activated. You know how to solve this?

the problem here was a section setting. has nothing to do with the previous file

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

No, I didn't.

then should pass files to who has nx or copy directly nx to correct files?
if requests concern solidworks problems and solutions with solidworks why use other programs?

 

[ceschi1959]

then should pass files to who has nx or copy directly nx to correct files?
if requests concern solidworks problems and solutions with solidworks why use other programs?

in the post #33 @ lucaot says it matters surfaces, so it's like it's got the 'dark' file. could therefore, import the file so shaken, close the holes on the surface that I have highlighted, for example by doing it again, and then merge everything. this is done with any cad and I simply highlighted the problem that no one had understood. I think the comparison between various techniques of use is very important.
Hi.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

I'm sorry if you do it with cad

I don't know if you teach me I'm grateful.

I think the comparison between various techniques of use is very important

The techniques are one thing and, in my opinion, the comparisons are valid if they remain within the framework of the same cad (I do this in one way you in another which are the pros and cons?) if you change the cad of comparison for mere technical issues does not make sense; it has already occurred in the forum that what you can do with a parametric cad is not possible to do it with another (in one debate recently it is seen that solidedge makes a continuous sheet on the curve while solid no)

 

[ceschi1959]

I don't know if you teach me I'm grateful.

Look here

The techniques are one thing and, in my opinion, the comparisons are valid if they remain within the same cad (I do this in one way you in another which are the pros and cons?) if you change the cad of comparison for mere technical issues does not make sense

there is even a section on mechanical cads in comparison. If you think you don't need the cancellation.

 

[MassiVonWeizen]

Look here

what you see is already a solid closed, do not get deceiving the section mode, here you are talking about closing a hole on a curved surface, joining the surfaces and turning them into last solid... a little more complex

You know the only way it works? by doing an import diagnostic, manually eliminating the faces to be corrected and then using the surface functions to close the holes and be able to turn into solid.
Now tell me which video explains this method or as with a cad that is not solidworks, you can find this solution. . .

If you think you don't need to cancel

the fact that I think this matter is unnecessary does not imply that it must be shared by all; I am mainly concrete and if you ask the solution of a specific problem I try to give the solution on how to solve that problem with those means.
so very free to bring solutions made with nx, but I think I'm equally free to say that to the user this post does not serve to have the solution

edit:
for correctness I cannot overlook the fact that your indication on the 2 holes has been more than useful to circumscribe the problem and of this I thank you

 

[czar]

with swx I solved so:
1)created zero offset of the surface with two "holes" and hidden.
2)Deleted the surface that has the two "holes" with -face case- selecting only "cancella"
3)Reactivated face display created with zero offset
4)filled the two "holes" with -surface filling-
5)united all faces and solid creation
6)Deleted the two faces of patch of the two "holes" with -face- option "cancella and patch"
7)Remain in the folder two surfaces that generate after step 2, which however the sw does not display and create problems, to be erased.

at this point if needed, the two holes will be remade that originally were probably there using the normal features.

 

[LaboratorioDieci]

Anyway, there's a bit of a problem, because those surfaces are there... without being there!

 

[320i S]

the part has a problem on the holes indicated baskets, which at the opening, seem empty, in fact the holes continue internally (superficies that do not appear), and the back surface, is not perforated.
if you do "face drop" to the surface with holes, then 3 surface bodies appear (image)
from here:
- you delete damaged surface bodies
- create surface with delimitation
- refills the new surface with the main surface body, maintaining the affected part
- merge surface creating solid