notte
Guest
@openoikos: I have not been able to find the article that we quote:\
not necessarily innovations bring greater efficiency. I have an extremely innovative keyboard, which has some keys in non-standard position: it is risking to fly from the window.
I personally (that I am not really an evolved "cadist", and I remained autocad 13) using the usual 4 commands in English, I do not use menu. to me the only thing that should not miss in a cad is the command line and the black screen. then menu, icons, toolbar are indifferent to me.
the tape bar, which I did not try in autocad but in word (-_-), I think you eat a lot of space, especially in wide screens, and make some commands inaccessible, trying perhaps to predict user choices. I really appreciate that the autodesk thought of leaving the possibility of a classic layout, which did not do the microsoft in office.
I believe that certain things require a time of digestion, especially for less unhealthy users. I have a friend who when he has to print a document from office 2010 calls me because he does not find the icon with the printer.
@tristan:
I do not say that technicians want to leave windows for mac or linux, but that many have got tired of this system. I like to think, and predictably this will lead to your illicitness, that linux can earn a share of the market. the phone, the radio and many other things seemed useless in the beginning.
as at the moment I could (I have done it in the past) use autocad 2004 with linux, with a little (really little) availability by autodesk could turn us even the most recent versions.
and as I already know that the question will be "but what advantage would I get?" my answer is practical (I leave issues of freedom and ethics to other means): extremely optimized machines, always operational, without reboots, crashes, viruses, and need to reinstall every three days. I'm obviously not referring to kubuntu, but to debian, bsd, slackware, redhat... and if it also takes some specialized staff to make an installation, I don't see anything wrong, even to make a rendering serves, and no one complains.
yesterday morning an engineer moved a toolbar inside autocad 2010, the program was planned and launched an error window (of windows) absolutely incomprehensible. it was no longer possible to open autocad, it had to restart. every reboot makes you lose the focus on the work you are doing. and, if result of a crash, also data.
As regards (again) graphics programs not relevant to the topic, we avoid admonishing us from the mod, I would be happy to discuss it elsewhere.
the natural selection there would be if there were any choice. the selection do the software houses.
not necessarily innovations bring greater efficiency. I have an extremely innovative keyboard, which has some keys in non-standard position: it is risking to fly from the window.
I personally (that I am not really an evolved "cadist", and I remained autocad 13) using the usual 4 commands in English, I do not use menu. to me the only thing that should not miss in a cad is the command line and the black screen. then menu, icons, toolbar are indifferent to me.
the tape bar, which I did not try in autocad but in word (-_-), I think you eat a lot of space, especially in wide screens, and make some commands inaccessible, trying perhaps to predict user choices. I really appreciate that the autodesk thought of leaving the possibility of a classic layout, which did not do the microsoft in office.
I believe that certain things require a time of digestion, especially for less unhealthy users. I have a friend who when he has to print a document from office 2010 calls me because he does not find the icon with the printer.
@tristan:
I do not say that technicians want to leave windows for mac or linux, but that many have got tired of this system. I like to think, and predictably this will lead to your illicitness, that linux can earn a share of the market. the phone, the radio and many other things seemed useless in the beginning.
as at the moment I could (I have done it in the past) use autocad 2004 with linux, with a little (really little) availability by autodesk could turn us even the most recent versions.
and as I already know that the question will be "but what advantage would I get?" my answer is practical (I leave issues of freedom and ethics to other means): extremely optimized machines, always operational, without reboots, crashes, viruses, and need to reinstall every three days. I'm obviously not referring to kubuntu, but to debian, bsd, slackware, redhat... and if it also takes some specialized staff to make an installation, I don't see anything wrong, even to make a rendering serves, and no one complains.
yesterday morning an engineer moved a toolbar inside autocad 2010, the program was planned and launched an error window (of windows) absolutely incomprehensible. it was no longer possible to open autocad, it had to restart. every reboot makes you lose the focus on the work you are doing. and, if result of a crash, also data.
As regards (again) graphics programs not relevant to the topic, we avoid admonishing us from the mod, I would be happy to discuss it elsewhere.
