Max-C
Guest
I don't think he wanted to tell you to go to the use, but to try to inform you also in American texts as (since) more complete than ours :smile:
Michelefi
Guest
but thank you and I will definitely buy it! !
meccanicamg
Guest
Right, don't you need to go to use? but use books that are used over there yes.
meccanicamg
Guest
I would have quoted like that.
geometric tolerances absent or almost seen that I am more than well the general ones
geometric tolerances absent or almost seen that I am more than well the general ones
Michelefi
Guest
thank you very much!!!...I will gladly study it
Michelefi
Guest
ordered the baldassini in the meantime. . .
meccanicamg
Guest
Did you do well to order it?
falonef
Guest
seems to me that the symmetry axis is missing in the fixing hole (4xd10.50) below
if I don't remember badly instead of quotating the r32 radius, the diameter should be quoted
the hole section is not homogeneous, the lines are missing
in the 1.30h13/19h12 seat there are no rays to be detailed with a great detail x?
the quota 2 and 1,30 I would not put them at the same height but I would scale one from the other vertically
for the rest seems to me well ;-)
if I don't remember badly instead of quotating the r32 radius, the diameter should be quoted
the hole section is not homogeneous, the lines are missing
in the 1.30h13/19h12 seat there are no rays to be detailed with a great detail x?
the quota 2 and 1,30 I would not put them at the same height but I would scale one from the other vertically
for the rest seems to me well ;-)
meccanicamg
Guest
the sampling is not brick and iron handles 31 but the standard solidworks. seeger gorges do with tool and come automatically even if you can make enlargement
meccanicamg
Guest
for holes quotas there are many possibilities:
- radius and indication quantity and hole diameter
- diameter gyre 64, hole diameter
- coordinates from the center
- angle and radius or diameter quotation
you could have done another view since with the 3d it does not cost effort.
- radius and indication quantity and hole diameter
- diameter gyre 64, hole diameter
- coordinates from the center
- angle and radius or diameter quotation
you could have done another view since with the 3d it does not cost effort.
bisogna_rimanere_umili
Guest
stupid question that does not hit anything with the tread...
Is the part that goes into tolerance?
but if instead of quarry seeger, he did (I am ready to take insults):
slightly + short shouldering of the bearing, threaded hole in the axis and rondellona to bring everything to "pack", is a porcade?
meccanicamg
Guest
theoretically different solutions could be made, among which do the short shouldering of a few cents of millimeter and pulling against a heavy washer with a central screw preloading. However, it may be more susceptible to unscrewing and in the case of the general design, if you are in a tube you do not get to pull the screw after, so do it first, as for the seeger and you must be sure that you do not avoid.
bisogna_rimanere_umili
Guest
I came to mind because of the reasoning that perhaps not all the workshops have available the truncator tool for the seeger quarry, to tell the truth I have never seen it perform. . .
and for the story of the colored part in assonometry? Is it a "truck" of the trade?
and for the story of the colored part in assonometry? Is it a "truck" of the trade?
meccanicamg
Guest
for the truncator for seeger just take a square or rectangular bar in standard hss and molarla to make us the desired tool or for the best balancebrasare the widia on an iron and grinding it.
if you do in series and repeatedly there are plaque inserts.
3d made with solidworks I can do anything, color the surfaces and put on the labels. I indicated it in blue because I usually have the habit of making colored pieces like reality, in the sense that the carpenters make it blue or green, the parts that move yellow, the pieces of natural iron grey, rectifying blue and pink tempra. This is because it is not said that I put on the table or spend time....so already all the 3d brings tolerances, dimensions, notes and easily understandable the rough areas from those worked
SUNIL KUMAR NALLAVELLI
Guest
Hi, Michael.
I'm trying to figure out the odds you quoted.
but I see that you've only listed a detail, you've also listed the other detail I've attached now? ?
Attachments
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
It's a four-year-old discussion...
What do you not understand? are simple pieces, what you have attached has nothing difficult to quote. quote and comment
What do you not understand? are simple pieces, what you have attached has nothing difficult to quote. quote and comment
welcome to the machine
Guest
I am also surprised that a discussion of a long time ago will be resumed, but I am not practical of forums and I am also going through the various discussions to see if there is something to learn.
on this design the thing that I don't understand is how you dismantle the piece: 4 m10 screws on 32mm radius, with a head encumbrance of about 19 mm, do not come away if the roller has more than 1.5mm thick on the seat of the 42 bearing, what impossible is looking at the proportions is, above all, if you have to get a seeger for interior. with brown heads we pass a diameter 48, but we always talk about 3 mm thick on the seat.
unless the roller is mounted to the stand and comes back slowly as they disassemble the screws....but a roller like that, to the stand on a single bearing, I do not see it so well....
on this design the thing that I don't understand is how you dismantle the piece: 4 m10 screws on 32mm radius, with a head encumbrance of about 19 mm, do not come away if the roller has more than 1.5mm thick on the seat of the 42 bearing, what impossible is looking at the proportions is, above all, if you have to get a seeger for interior. with brown heads we pass a diameter 48, but we always talk about 3 mm thick on the seat.
unless the roller is mounted to the stand and comes back slowly as they disassemble the screws....but a roller like that, to the stand on a single bearing, I do not see it so well....
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
I thought it was an exercise design, maybe a test to evaluate the knowledge. It seems to me that it is said that there are those who have evaluated the work. there were gross errors in drawing as well as a good dose of indisputation in the author of the post. that then maybe those screws are not placed on a radius of 32, but on a cateto of 32 then seeing frontally the screws would be placed at 45° regarding the vertical and with a radius of 45
welcome to the machine
Guest
You're right, probably so. I based myself on the design of mecanicamg, but he also had no other data except the first drawing of the discussion and certainly did not waste time checking disassembly. he just tried to explain how decently a drawing is quoted and in fact was useful to michele, which a nice step forward did. Now the roller could even put it on its own... .