exxon
Guest
and what does it have to do with what I wrote? to make a apple pie takes 45 minutes. the times when an engineer has to be able to acquire specific knowledge of the work he has to carry out must be irrelevant if compared with the time necessary to complete the work itself. If it is not so, you pass to the next.and what are the "natural" times for you? You say there's too many years? a degree in engineering or even a certificate of expert you think can be obtained in a few months maybe with an evening school or surfing the internet?
It's true, you find online games, mit courses, porn sites, pisa classes, horoscopes, etc. is for those who navigate decide where to access. internet is great, and in this it improves day by day.if you find everything on the net and the opposite of everything and certain things do not find them (e.g. the norms, except if the discharges illegally), the fact that it focuses attention on the driver emphasizes the attention on the technicalism that you place in the interview.
Maybe for you. It's not for me. and not because the information is found on the internet, but because the information is found. If I want to work at the duchies, I don't introduce myself by saying "I don't know anything about motion, you have to train me if you want me to do something." if you present yourself with these credentials, it means that you are not interested ("passionate") of what you are asking to do. for the company it is better to stay away from these candidates.you know your industry, but one who doesn't come from your industry may not have certain knowledge, but can acquire them, pretend that he only has them because the info are found on the internet is an absurd thing.
if the interview was at a company producing tanks and it was my interest to work on it... You can swear!If you went to interview and asked you to size a tank of 6000 cubic meters according to the 650 bees norms or a pressure vessel according to asme, would you be able to do it?
read more carefully... the two years in one city and the three years in another. I have not seen great differences between an athenoea and the other here from us, on the contrary, berkeley was an oxygen vent.You only attended the two-year period and that's why university environments seem stale.
You're drawing unequivocal conclusions about facts you don't know. If you read my posts, maybe you understand better. In particular, I can tell you that the mathematical analysis courses were yes, a big disappointment (if I went back forty years I would move to pisa...), but the worst I saw in the three years, where the teachers held courses on 50-year-old technologies and the update was great.Perhaps the department of mathematics or chemistry may seem to be, but in the two years we study the subjects that will then be propedeutic for subsequent examinations. Of course, if you were planning to do a machine construction course, you will be disappointed as before.
Yes, I confirm. Italian universities are at a lower level of European and world excellence. Maybe more than one.the generalization and idea you have on the Italian university are totally wrong, there are many universities also "minor" (that is beyond the polytechnic of Milan or Turin) that have departments, laboratories and professors of all respect.
I can say something about a thousand: Although I have never taught in that athenaeus, I have had the honour of being in the polytechnic graduation committee, and the level of preparation of the graduates of that session was certainly not one of the excellences. if they represent the national apex, everything matches.
Math... I always talked about maths about pisa... If I'm not mistaken, they're still pissing maths, right?then you talk about the normal pisa, great Italian excellence, but maybe you don't even know that it doesn't make engineers.