• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

i think 3.0

  • Thread starter Thread starter blubossa
  • Start date Start date

blubossa

Guest
Hi.
I currently use creo 2.0 but do you think it is worth updating to creo 3.0?
What version did they get?

Thank you.
bb
 
Hi bb, that's a question I asked myself. There is no answer because I think it depends on the specific work of the user. I personally installed it but I still work with the 2 because on this pc it seems more snappy and reliable (now I have the m230 and will continue to update it until the end of the year). I attach a pdf with the improvements that are going from 2 to 3, maybe take a look at it and if you see that something can interest you to improve the work you do deepen.
in general it can be said that the most important aspects that have led many users to migrate to 3 are:
  • data exchange (import other cad data without passing through neutral formats)
  • detailed drawings (fully redesigned)
personally a detail that I really like is the new menu ofedit reference I find it much more intuitive. It also works well in the 2 (the same way) only that you have to apply a moment more with the curtains to use it well.. .
 

Attachments

Last edited:
calacc said:
Hi bb, that's a question I asked myself. There is no answer because I think it depends on the specific work of the user. I personally installed it but I still work with the 2 because on this pc it seems more snappy and reliable (now I have the m230 and will continue to update it until the end of the year). I attach a pdf with the improvements that are going from 2 to 3, maybe take a look at it and if you see that something can interest you to improve the work you do deepen.
in general it can be said that the most important aspects that have led many users to migrate to 3 are:
  • data exchange (import other cad data without passing through neutral formats)
  • detailed drawings (fully redesigned)
personally a detail that I really like is the new menu ofedit reference I find it much more intuitive. It also works well in the 2 (the same way) only that you have to apply a moment more with the curtains to use it well.. .
Click to expand...
Hi.
but are you sure you have the m230 of creo 3.0?
I don't think I've read anywhere that they've come to this version....

bb
 
...ok.
I hoped in some intervention of other users of creo 3.0 to hear their opinions...:frown:

bb
 
I use creo 3.0, but I can compare with creo 1.0 and wildfire series, not creo 2.0
I have to say that the steps ahead are many and under so many points of view.
First of all, the possibility of resetting imported maths that result as non-solidifying surfaces, in addition to added commands, the interface is much more complete.
 
calacc said:
Hi bb, that's a question I asked myself. There is no answer because I think it depends on the specific work of the user. I personally installed it but I still work with the 2 because on this pc it seems more snappy and reliable (now I have the m230 and will continue to update it until the end of the year). I attach a pdf with the improvements that are going from 2 to 3, maybe take a look at it and if you see that something can interest you to improve the work you do deepen.
in general it can be said that the most important aspects that have led many users to migrate to 3 are:
  • data exchange (import other cad data without passing through neutral formats)
  • detailed drawings (fully redesigned)
personally a detail that I really like is the new menu ofedit reference I find it much more intuitive. It also works well in the 2 (the same way) only that you have to apply a moment more with the curtains to use it well.. .
Click to expand...
Bye-bye.
I just passed to 3.0 with the purchase of a new license (with 2.0 I was without maintenance just over two years)
in version 3.0 there was no possibility of having the native tree of the files imported from other cad?
Hi.
 
Daniele-san said:
Bye-bye.
I just passed to 3.0 with the purchase of a new license (with 2.0 I was without maintenance just over two years)
in version 3.0 there was no possibility of having the native tree of the files imported from other cad?
Hi.
Click to expand...
Try to explain yourself better, I'm honest, I don't understand.
 
Daniele-san said:
Bye-bye.
I just passed to 3.0 with the purchase of a new license (with 2.0 I was without maintenance just over two years)
in version 3.0 there was no possibility of having the native tree of the files imported from other cad?
Hi.
Click to expand...
No, what you mean is a chimera. I do not believe that neither in creo nor in any other cad you will ever have the possibility to import a model of another cad and have the possibility to have also available the entire modeling tree completely editable.
Actually between importing one step of another cad rather than the native format of another cad there are no big advantages. the only one is that if you import a native file of another cad in creo, you build on features in creo and change the basic native file you do not miss all the later features of creo. If you do the same thing with one step now, all the next features jump. I hope I explained.
it maintains some association between features of creo and the native file. instead with the step not.
in my business reality this feature is almost useless
 
if that's what you mean [MENTION=13287]fetus[/MENTION]...I agree, there will never be a native tree.
to take as remarkable the fact that I create natively open the files of the most popular cads, without going through a universal format!
 
the native model tree with the editable features no. It is understandable that features are created with mathematical algorithms different from one cad to another. the modification is carried out with flexible modeling acting directly on the geometry for direct modeling. This is seen in the example video:[youtube]th_dimrwh5c[/youtube]I also attach the pdf on the united technology
 

Attachments

calacc said:
the native model tree with the editable features no. It is understandable that features are created with mathematical algorithms different from one cad to another. the modification is carried out with flexible modeling acting directly on the geometry for direct modeling. This is seen in the example video:[youtube]th_dimrwh5c[/youtube]I also attach the pdf on the united technology
Click to expand...
:finger: :finger: :finger: :finger:
 
Good morning to all; I connect to this old discussion as I am now beginning to use creo 2.0 (on customer request); could you help me please?
I have issues related to the use of certain functions:
1) definition of the sketch: How do I know if the sketch is defined?
I noticed that the color of the lines sometimes turns red sometimes yellow: what changes? the problem is also that dragging the points move the quotas; to avoid it I have to "block" on each quota? or is there another system?
2) there is the segment string command: there is no long segment until the edge (as autocad).
3) If I have to create more threaded holes, can I do it through one "hole" function? or do I have to create many single holes?
4) how do you create a parallel plane to another but passing one axis?
5) is it possible to turn the view into a quotated table or should I change the type of view from the properties?
I searched on the web, but unfortunately there is very little material online; I ask you help and thank you.
 
1) I create tells you if something is missing when you leave the sketch mode, the odds if you have not put them you, he puts them; the quotas in yellow are editable with the drag, if you want blocked, you must tell it (there is a setting in the config. pro to put, for having blocked them, when you change them from the first time).
2) I don't remember the creo sketch 2, but there is
3) hole function is unique, there is the set of points, do a dot sketch on one of these put the hole and then select the dot sketch for the series (or create it inside the series command)
4) what you said: create piano (menu creates references), choose the plan, put it parallel and then passing through the axis, of course if axis and plane are not parallel, will not create the plan
5)The view ownership tab does everything, if you have difficulty orienting them, create the view in 3d saving it and then find it among the choices.
 
Hello! Thank you very much for the answer;
1) great, I will try thanks!
2) Yes, I found; ctrl must be pressed to extend the lines
3) ok, only that I had more holes to different interaxes, so it would be useful to repeat the only series (such as solidworks/solidedge); I don't think you can do it. Besides, in my version, I noticed that the series, you can run a limited number of times (I think 3); also in yours?
4) ok, but it does not make me; I'll try again.
5) Yes, I am taking my hand; I find it a bit slender, but we have to keep it that way;-)
Thanks again 320is!!! Good evening and good weekend. soon
 
3) if you have different interaxes, the top is in series of points (of sketch), on this some extra possibility because the points of "solid geometry" are counted, but there are points of "building geometry", what is absent for example in solidworks; the series is also limited to me, but there is a very precise reason, that is the complexity of reconstruction, which inevitably increases, in my opinion beyond the second level of series, it is not worth going; consider that I create automatically feels the feature series together without selecting them, but already at double level, things get complicated.
4) on creo references has a lot of possibilities, but requires absolute consistency in what you select, does not make any approximation, for example if an axis you feel perpendicular to a plane, measuring you indicate "90°", attention that means that they are not really perpendicular, while if you write "perpendicular" or "paralleles", this indicates absolute precision.
5) in its macchinosity, however, gives you the possibility to achieve any view, in addition to reorientation, also creating the sections directly from them (which then you find also in 3d), as well as endless multiple local sections (some cad does not do this).
 
if you have different interaxes, the top is set of points (of sketch), on this some extra possibility because the points of "solid geometry" are counted, but there are points of "building geometry", what is absent for example in solidworks;
Click to expand...
Okay, could you turn me off better? I tried but I can't;
I create a sketch first and insert simple points like sw?
What do you mean by construction geometry?
 
whatever you draw in sketch, you can turn it into construction geometry (so it will not become solid), idem points, those that will become "building" will not participate in the set of points.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Total: 6 (members: 0, guests: 6)
Back
Top