impossible loft.

[marcof]

and the fact that you suggested that I had to use the solid loft I don't know. from the beginning I had to use them.

Tell me I read bad and I didn't understand anything, because now my head turns.
:biggrin:

but for a cow boia misery ladra and infamous... I missed this pearl!
It's really great. but I feel like breaking a spear (on the back :tongue in favor of panormus. He was so confused in this phantasmagoric mirror climbing exercise in the mirror room where he ventured that he wrapped himself, but he definitely wanted to write that I had suggested using the mirrors surfaces e non i solidi.It must be like this. If it's not like that... I tear my clothes off (from lacché) and I cry :redface:

 

[marcof]

Caxxo, you're right! I should have written it in French on parchment with the goose pen, after wearing a livery from lacché, red and edged in lace, with white silk socks and black paint shoes with bow and golden fibbione:smile:

but also with the lace handkerchief held in the palm though! :smile:

lace handkerchief is held between ring and mile, folded in half. Where do you live? :smile:

 

[Er Presidente]

lace handkerchief is held between ring and mile, folded in half. Where do you live? :smile:

I apologize for ignorance and for the clumsy attempt to "emerge" in a field I don't know and to which I'm not angry!

p.s., but in the movies it seemed different. Boh!

 

[Er Presidente]

http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=32595That's where I heard it.
:biggrin:

 

[marcof]

http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showthread.php?t=32595That's where I heard it.
:biggrin:

and look what you wrote to him:

Remember, who loses time to wrong you, loves you.

how did this thread go I practically have to be in love:biggrin:
so or panormus has short memory or wanted to pick up someone:tongue:

@panormus, recommended to.r.with the present the undersigned marcof, to scan of equivocs, and in full possession of his mental faculties

declares
​

1)I'm joking
2)that there are no bad intentions as written in these last post of crap.
3) that he could never fall in love with panormus.

in faith

Marcof

modena, 21/08/2012

 

[re_solidworks]

I read only now your answer to panormus because I was dedicated to writing mine, which is not polemic and is not an addition but a clarification indispensable.
I hope you don't think it makes me put in the position where he would paint me panormus without blinking.



:confused
I wasn't rude and I would have preferred a "maybe" to a "will." I became sarcastic and cutting only after to have received the answers that are under the eyes of all.
but does the consecutio of dialogue still matter in an exchange of written opinions or not?

I reread the posts and actually have to give you reason, I used an inappropriate term.

Well, I don't have much time to answer fiscally as you always do..
and the fact that you suggested that I had to use the solid loft did not clarify that from the beginning I had to use them.

As for the shin, I think anyone who felt that he would turn in a little garbate and provocative manner would be annoyed.

If a tutorial had a mistake I don't see a drama at all, on the contrary I would consider it rather than criticize it, could it be no?

Humility is to admit that there is no mistake in the tutorial (it seems to me that it has already done it but you did not understand it and continue to quote) because the error is upstream, but this has not been told, and it was not necessary to encapsulate on saying the tutorial is correct and wrong, but to make me understand the error.

his ways, if I had been moderator I would certainly have laughed, because the shape is very important, I could not be insistent if the regress I thought was correct and so I did not see the surfaces, let's face this. on icons, I have seen better the difference, but for a profane, (for you now that you are accustomed it is easy to notice it) can escape.

I said this close, it seems to me that you have supported the polemic of the friend marcof (who is continuing undaunted for your softness and tolerance), when I did not argue but I defend myself from continuous accusations.

Anyway, it's closed here for me, I hope my friend marcof doesn't get into my future posts if not with the necessary ways.

thanks to you I performed the tutorial.

see panormus, we moderators are "executors" that we try to enforce the rules of the forum by following possibly an agreed philosophy and trying to read objectively what is written: We do not invent from us how to moderate.
in my opinion you had an excessive reaction to a sarcastic comment. I, instead of marcof, would have saved sarcasm and rather I wouldn't have answered you... but I am marcof and marcof is marcof, each has its character and acts as it considers appropriate.
in any case marcof did not violate any rules and was right in saying that you did not read the tutorial carefully, then at the initial question "where am I wrong?" I reply in not reading with due attention the instructions of the tutorial. your questions are the testimony, you read a little here and you tried to do the exercise and so it is difficult to succeed.
this morning I did it myself to see if there were holes or interpretable instructions, but it is explained in detail, step-by-step and just follow the letter what is written.
now really stop with these polemics, clarification I have milk to the knees... and it's not the lola.