irregular cruise vault with autocad

[GP.]

try this procedure:

- basic polylinea offset
- voltac with surface option on the two polylines, that of the extensive with arc height +30 cm regarding the intradox
- Extrude basic polylinea with surface option
- scolpiscisuperf by selecting everything

you will have to make attempts to mediate a offset value that returns a thickness of about 30 cm, a value of 35/36 should go well, depends on the size of the sides.

 

[frasco]

I'm sorry.

I can't believe

 

[frasco]

I was referring to my previously attached file.

I can't believe

 

[GP.]

a change to my last post, slightly shift the tops of the offset polyline and carry them on the extension of the diagonals.

 

[Cloe85]

I was stalked by the professor and I had to write the introduction of the thesis these days. tomorrow I have reviewed, from Thursday I return operational and I will let you know if with the suggestion of gp. everything goes to good end! I didn't want you to think that glass efforts were useless! :
Frasco do not worry, it is a month I try to find solutions and in creating inaccuracies are the ace. being so irregular it is extremely difficult that they do not come out... and that's exactly what tilts the seismic analysis program......... .

thank you all, soon!

 

[doking]

Good luck with graduation? :wink:

 

[c'erounavolta]

I was stalked by the professor and I had to write the introduction of the thesis these days. tomorrow I have reviewed, from Thursday I return operational and I will let you know if with the suggestion of gp. everything goes to good end! I didn't want you to think that glass efforts were useless! :
Frasco do not worry, it is a month I try to find solutions and in creating inaccuracies are the ace. being so irregular it is extremely difficult that they do not come out... and that's exactly what tilts the seismic analysis program......... .

thank you all, soon!

If you want me to pass the canvas of two excellent masons, maybe do first:wink: I was joking:biggrin:

 

[Cloe85]

eheheh considering that it has been several months that model, a small medieval castelletto two masons operosi me would have pulled it up!
Thanks also for the good luck, I will need it!

 

[doking]

eheheh considering that it has been several months that model, a small medieval castelletto two masons operosi me would have pulled it up!thanks also for the good luckI'll need it!

No, no, no, no, no.

 

[Cloe85]

No, no, no, no, no.

Well, I don't know if it's the wrong answer, but I got back to work trying if the last gp solution was working. result: it is from this morning that I produce strange surfaces and try to understand why with my autocad the lisp does not work.
I try to retrace what I did so that you can tell me if you find mistakes:
1-loaded the lisp with command _appload
2-control voltac
3-selection basic polylinea
4-input arch height
5-surface
6-no chewing at the base

I also tried to reduce the height of the arch to make a test, since gp. had specified that it was not to be greater than half of the shorter side, while in my case it was a height of 110 cm against a minimum length of 200 cm sides, but also entering a height of 70 the result does not vary.
igo screen and dwg.

Why the hell are you doing this to me?? ? great way to resume work.

View attachment Volte 9-12.dwg

 

[GP.]

I don't know what to say. I can't replicate the problem.
the height should not be higher than the base because otherwise you should build an elliptical arc, even if the difference "almost" is not perceived.
By leaving this last aspect see if a result of the genus is good, the problem is that less the sides are equal the more the difference of thickness of the time in proximity to the arches.

 

[Cloe85]

Good morning, everyone.
then, I uninstalled and reinstalled autocad last night and now the lisp works...go to understand!
Anyway...gp. the file you attached goes well, there was only something that didn't go in the top right (the shortest thread), but I fixed. Now that the lisp works I feel powerful!:finger:
As far as the variation in thickness is concerned, I now feel prof. but I think it is acceptable, even because finding other solutions seems quite complex.

I was trying now create arches between once and the other.
I thought:
-create a copy of the lateral surfaces of the "solids turned to a cruise" (copy faces)
-exploding faces (explodes)
- combine the segments obtained to form a spline (union)
-make a loft between the two spline obtained (loft)
-unite "loft arc" and the "solid cruise times" neighboring (unisci)

But obviously once my faces explode, I don't always apply the union command. what the program writes is "there must be selected at least 2 solids, surfaces or regions. "

alternative methods or solutions?
- - - updated - - - -ps: thank you so much to all, really, I don't know if I'll get to the bottom but without you I certainly wouldn't have graduated! ! !

 

[GP.]

...alternative methods or solutions? . . .

Meanwhile do not explode the solids, with xspigoli you still get the definition geometry of the solid, to join the portions of the spline you have to use merge, not union.

But I would do this:
- convinsuperf of every time
- erases intradox and extradox surfaces, in one shot only you remain the regions of all edges - loft between region and region (it does not create a solid but a surface)
- sculptsuperf and select (even with a window) the two regions and the newly created surface

 

[Cloe85]

But I would do this:
- convinsuperf of every time
- erases intradox and extradox surfaces, in one shot only you remain the regions of all edges - loft between region and region (it does not create a solid but a surface)
- sculptsuperf and select (even with a window) the two regions and the newly created surface

extremely faster, it works.

problem: when I try to join in a single solid vaults and arches ( indispensable operation for export on the seismic analysis program) the command does not go.

 

[GP.]

problem: when I try to join in one solid vault and bows......... The command is not right.

already, that strange, you can solve by creating all the loft surfaces and then using scolpiscisuperf at the end (also selecting the times).

 

[Cloe85]

:

Come on! !

I send the file to the prof. to check what you think.
I'll let you know shortly. .

ps: I wait for the address to send you the Christmas package!

 

[doking]

we want a sun: eek:

 

[Cloe85]

boys here are the sun: the prof. has decreed that the system of times created with the lisp of gp. is ok! therefore problem solved, I am bringing some small corrections to better turn everything on the program of seismic analysis but basic the result is good, indeed to say it with the words of prof. "solid mesh is perfect!!". :smile:

I have another problem, though, with some barrels in another area of the castle, do I open a new discussion for those or continue here?

Thank you so much to all, really!

 

[GP.]

I'm going to open a new discussion for those or I'm going on here?

good the first, also to facilitate in the future any research of discussions.

 

[Cristallo]

boys here are the sun: the prof. has decreed that the system of times created with the lisp of gp. is ok!
indeed to say it with the words of prof. "the solid mesh is perfect!!"

as he told me a remarkable ing. little back time.... "The engineers now throw them behind you... a good geometra is now precious goods"