keyboard combination

[reb_bl]

Bye to all,
recently (even a month to tell the truth) I started to use in a assiduous way co created 15.50 (rel. 2007) and use annotation for the boards, everything is already very personalized, but "I want more"...
I was pleasantly surprised by the "banality" of modeling 3d and unpleasantly surprised by the rigidity of annotation, but the judgement remains widely positive, I finally realized what is the famous disease known as "parastrubbolite" .:biggrin:

Well, first I said that I "want more", my request to you that you are more practical than I would be: with the combination of crtl+tab keys I can set to switch from 3d environment to 2d environment?
If yes, can you give me the syntax of the command?

Thank you so much!

I know you will hear me again with similar questions

 

[Er Presidente]

Bye to all,
recently (even a month to tell the truth) I started to use in a assiduous way co created 15.50 (rel. 2007) and use annotation for the boards, everything is already very personalized, but "I want more"...
I was pleasantly surprised by the "banality" of modeling 3d and unpleasantly surprised by the rigidity of annotation, but the judgement remains widely positive, I finally realized what is the famous disease known as "parastrubbolite" .:biggrin:

Well, first I said that I "want more", my request to you that you are more practical than I would be: with the combination of crtl+tab keys I can set to switch from 3d environment to 2d environment?
If yes, can you give me the syntax of the command?

Thank you so much!

I know you will hear me again with similar questions

programming the keys should be possible, but I don't want to be wrong, but there is already a keyboard command to switch to cocreate to annotation.
I have to ask those who work harder, take a tour of the online help, there are a lot of pearls in the folds of the system.

Hi.

p.s.: I'm glad you've become aware of the disease, but the cure will be osticated. :smile:
annotation is rognose, am if you learn to use me10 without "barking" links with cocreate you can try the Jew to work in 2d in "stand alone" and then reconnect with the 3d.

 

[Er Presidente]

I recommend, even if it costs and has a horrible feeling, use the paramentric module (paramentric and assembly).

The set of the two has a "dopante" effect!
:biggrin:

 

[Parametric_Ozzy]

I recommend, even if it costs and has a horrible feeling, use the paramentric module (paramentric and assembly).

The set of the two has a "dopante" effect!
:biggrin:

do you see that we are getting closer and closer?

 

[reb_bl]

I recommend, even if it costs and has a horrible feeling, use the paramentric module (paramentric and assembly).

The set of the two has a "dopante" effect!
:biggrin:

It doesn't depend on me... I'd feel better than 15.50, but I think for a while I'm not "updated."

As far as the "care" is concerned, it is already giving its effects, and now, the changes "do not make me fear" :biggrin:

:bekle: long life at the context!!! :finger:

 

[reb_bl]

annotation is rognose, am if you learn to use me10 without "barking" links with cocreate you can try the Jew to work in 2d in "stand alone" and then reconnect with the 3d.

explains it is robetta... You have to speak earthly with me, I'm like a child who let the pc touch the first times... :biggrin:

 

[Shaba]

It's simple.
with annotation generates views for the table
save the table in .me10 format
then all the quotation you do with me10
There are some rules to follow in order not to lose the association with the 3d
I've been doing this for years, but I've never been listed with annotation.
all this

 

[MFT]

It's simple.
with annotation generates views for the table
save the table in .me10 format
then all the quotation you do with me10
There are some rules to follow in order not to lose the association with the 3d
I've been doing this for years, but I've never been listed with annotation.
all this

I don't see all these problems.

 

[Shaba]

It's gonna be 13 years I use me10.
me10 strictly with the interface unix like
me10 heavily customized.
then is the same environment to say 2d pure that 2d boards obtained from 3d
There are no stories for me. much better me10

 

[MFT]

It's gonna be 13 years I use me10.
me10 strictly with the interface unix like
me10 heavily customized.
then is the same environment to say 2d pure that 2d boards obtained from 3d
There are no stories for me. much better me10

I started using me10 version 3 unix in the distant 1990.
I also use pure me10 clients, only by doing the 3d I make the 2d with annotation.

 

[Shaba]

That I have to tell you, I feel good like this and I'm not going to change.
:

 

[Er Presidente]

explains it is robetta... You have to speak earthly with me, I'm like a child who let the pc touch the first times... :biggrin:

then you have to start from the beginning.
It was 1903.

as you have had well notice, osd, unlike other "poor" cad when it generates 2d views it does so "lightly" differently.
does not create a simple 3d view "trucked" with objects in wireframe seen from the various directions and with the 3d quotas put to "scimmiottare" quotas 2d, osd always generates true 2d views, which are independent from the model but connected to it.
the generation of views is slower (natural!) but the views reside in an autonomous file that can be edited on its own (me10) and, if "worked" following the rules, settled without losing the links.
Every 2d item can have endless connected views that you can send to nebraska or cina, and if on the other side of the world they use me10 with the rules, they can send you updated and you can hang it back to your 3d, which maybe has changed, and update it.

p.s.: I know I look like a partisan, but I assure you that's right!
:biggrin:

 

[reb_bl]

then you have to start from the beginning.
It was 1903.

What is that? Your first day of work? :biggrin:

as you have had well notice, osd, unlike other "poor" cad when it generates 2d views it does so "lightly" differently.
does not create a simple 3d view "trucked" with objects in wireframe seen from the various directions and with the 3d quotas put to "scimmiottare" quotas 2d, osd always generates true 2d views, which are independent from the model but connected to it.
the generation of views is slower (natural!) but the views reside in an autonomous file that can be edited on its own (me10) and, if "worked" following the rules, settled without losing the links.
Every 2d item can have endless connected views that you can send to nebraska or cina, and if on the other side of the world they use me10 with the rules, they can send you updated and you can hang it back to your 3d, which maybe has changed, and update it.

p.s.: I know I look like a partisan, but I assure you that's right!

I'm sorry, but if I'm changing table 2d, I'm also updating 3d? (Not true?!? ! )

What are the differences between annotation and me10?

 

[Er Presidente]

What is that? Your first day of work? :biggrin:

That's the year of the first flight, ignorant!
read the "history" immediately and in a month I want a summary in your own words!
:biggrin:

I'm sorry, but if I'm changing table 2d, I'm also updating 3d? (Not true?!? ! )

What are the differences between annotation and me10?

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,

 

[reb_bl]

Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh, oh,

Thanks for the answer! I had seen that in fact annotation the me10 files were opened quietly...

What about this instead?

I'm sorry, but if I'm changing table 2d, I'm also updating 3d? (Not true?!? ! )

 

[Er Presidente]

... I'm sorry, but if I'm changing table 2d, I'm also updating 3d? (Not true?!? ! )

No!

2d depends on 3d, it's succube and supino.
:biggrin:

Others lie about lying, as the 2d doesn't exist (for them) you're actually always working on the 3d, implaimed by 2d.
:biggrin:

 

[reb_bl]

No!

2d depends on 3d, it's succube and supino.


Others lie about lying, as the 2d doesn't exist (for them) you're actually always working on the 3d, implaimed by 2d.

Well, I'm glad I got it wrong.

fact is that I am contextual is really "rock & roll" and that I still have to "take hand"... are at the level of monkey choosing if single banana or helmet

 

[Er Presidente]

the real limit of osd (those pricks never wanted to listen to me! :smile: ) are the "transitors", you have to be careful that if during the transformation of a decoy model into a "non manifold" the command fails and you do not have an information of where and when you jam.
with time you will take confidence and you will have antennas, but in some cases it is a serious limit, you can have a compatible start and a correct arrival, but if you have a "verbotten" pass, you can't pass the "muro".
Many things have improved and osd can also add faces that do not exist on the starting model, but they are not roses and flowers.
If you find any ostical case post that we're going to deal with together.

Hi.

 

[reb_bl]

the real limit of osd (those pricks never wanted to listen to me! :smile: ) are the "transitors", you have to be careful that if during the transformation of a decoy model into a "non manifold" the command fails and you do not have an information of where and when you jam.
with time you will take confidence and you will have antennas, but in some cases it is a serious limit, you can have a compatible start and a correct arrival, but if you have a "verbotten" pass, you can't pass the "muro".
Many things have improved and osd can also add faces that do not exist on the starting model, but they are not roses and flowers.
If you find any ostical case post that we're going to deal with together.

Hi.

Thanks so much of the availability, for now in the modeling I have no big problems, also because my modeling is quite basic, I saw that the command "cut surface" (it seems) has its limits, but the beautiful is that you have more chance to get to the same result, depending on how much you like: a great stuff imho.

Today in annotation I came across a "fast" thing, it is against my "principle of quotation", but sometimes it is necessary to make virtue to bridge the times. I had to quote the classic base plate with a spindle of threads and thorns and I thought I would ride it with the drilling table, but I realized that non aggiorna the quotas! to which I am armed of quotation in parallel, and via low to quota all 60 the holes "hand" :biggrin:

 

[MFT]

Thanks so much of the availability, for now in the modeling I have no big problems, also because my modeling is quite basic, I saw that the command "cut surface" (it seems) has its limits, but the beautiful is that you have more chance to get to the same result, depending on how much you like: a great stuff imho.

Today in annotation I came across a "fast" thing, it is against my "principle of quotation", but sometimes it is necessary to make virtue to bridge the times. I had to quote the classic base plate with a spindle of threads and thorns and I thought I would ride it with the drilling table, but I realized that non aggiorna the quotas! to which I am armed of quotation in parallel, and via low to quota all 60 the holes "hand" :biggrin:

but for that there would be this macro I never tried it but if I didn't understand badly should do what you say
http://osd.cad.de/lisp_2d_19.htm