Peppe
Guest
estrusioni?Yes, but in case you don't have it like mine you do to remove the extra holes?
estrusioni?Yes, but in case you don't have it like mine you do to remove the extra holes?
the question concerned a specific problem concerning the functionality of solidworks and not on the management of codes@massivonweizenp/n = part number.
logically, if a mirrored part becomes somehow different from the original part number must be changed.
I abort those solutions with the same part number and notes on the table "on the left side do not make holes".
but here we talk about parts.Now I don't dare open it because I'm working with 2017. did you check the interrupted link option, during creation?
However, without opening it, for the assemblies, personally, I always prefer to reconstruct the mirrored version....View attachment 68333
as it said andrea1974, now that I think again, even in the company where I worked before, the components obtained through "specchia part" were abolished because they gave problems with the pdm.but here we talk about parts.
Did you write code in the drawing sheet as well? or in the pdm ...of times it does not recognize if written different. ..code or code or code does not always recognize them as equal.we tried to call up code or remove it but nothing happens, but they tell me to contact the pdm because it may not be a solidworks problem but the pdm that messs up the program. .
tried both cases.. Nothing.Did you write code in the drawing sheet as well? or in the pdm ...of times it does not recognize if written different. ..code or code or code does not always recognize them as equal.