cacciatorino
Guest
Can you help me find modeling online exercises? I'll be late this morning, but I can't find them. 
Er Presidente
Guest
Haven't you learned yet? You've been working on it for months and you're still looking for exercises?Can you help me find modeling online exercises? I'll be late this morning, but I can't find them.
Hand hammer and chisel and go, pedal!
:biggrin:
cacciatorino
Guest
No, it's for my father who wants to be impratichied, but I unfortunately live far away...
MFT
Guest
The only exercises I know are the ones you find in the program...... and then what you need:biggrin:
Er Presidente
Guest
Er Presidente
Guest
you feel no lost without their parachutes featuring!
cacciatorino
Guest
Where are they? Tell me where I find the menu?
Er Presidente
Guest
dirotec, make him a schemetto, clear and concise othersment "lost"!
p.s.: they are "simple" minds, you must have patience!
:biggrin:
cacciatorino
Guest
After all, I'm still not sleeping at night, thinking about what can happen to my models not totally bound when I turn off the pc at night. :frown: the next morning they will still be as I left them?
MFT
Guest
That's a good question, that's the one that opens you up to start it, but you're taking me in the opposite, I don't know, look at us if I find the way I know
Er Presidente
Guest
and here I want to open a "parents".
two scenarios:
- in the first you have a "paraplegic" where at every "regeneration" the whole path of processing and profiles is repeated to recreate the models that make up your set. attention, models are recreated in the true sense of the word, not only graphically regenerated.
- in the second hypothesis the axieme is loaded by a contextual from a file and regenerated to video.
Where do you think there's more possibility of error?
Have you ever wondered why on all parastrubboli impervert scheleton and topadoun? How come you try to convince everyone that it is better not to bind faces in the assemblies but to connect the schec directly to the models without annihilating the constraints?
PierArg
Guest
ahahahahha...it's true!
even when I went from a parametric sw to I create modeling I made "easy" to get used to the assemblies.
PierArg
Guest
MFT
Guest
but I sincerely to this thing that move the models I never thought about, but for what reason it is not that spends a solar storm at night moving them.... but because in the parastrubula they move themselves: eek:
marcof
Guest
There is normally no problem with the models that reside on fixed workstations or on business servers.
The tragedy is when you work with the laptop. the risk that all parts of the axieme fall on the horizontal plane during the insertion/transport in the bag is very high.
for now the only solution (other than buying the parametric module specially created to overcome these problems) is to transport the laptop always horizontally, with a lot of caution and without waste.
to the ptc-cocreate recommend a shopping cart modified or even better a wheelchair, possibly in oak wood, pushed by a Romanian farmer
:biggrin:Er Presidente
Guest
the problem actually arises, often when working in group.
If a man works at a "seek-member" and moves things to the house, he settles his own together, but he disposes of all the assemblies of others.
It's typical with bookshelf sets or, anyway, shared, if to reposition them move the components instead of "entry" the group, they come out the most fun things.
then there is the problem that you have to be very careful when selecting small shifts, there is who "diverts" to move objects "hand" instead of using smart snaps and you find spaces, micrometric overlaps etc.
the assembly module and the parametric module are a "holy hand", but they cost three eyes of the head and to the ptc commercials you would have to pick up the eyes!
:smile:
Er Presidente
Guest
You shut up, steamed mats!:biggrin:There is normally no problem with the models that reside on fixed workstations or on business servers.
The tragedy is when you work with the laptop. the risk that all parts of the axieme fall on the horizontal plane during the insertion/transport in the bag is very high.
for now the only solution (other than buying the parametric module specially created to overcome these problems) is to transport the laptop always horizontally, with a lot of caution and without waste.
to the ptc-cocreate recommend a shopping cart modified or even better a wheelchair, possibly in oak wood, pushed by a Romanian farmer
cacciatorino
Guest
the incredible!!! He admitted it!!!! were years that denied the evidence!!!!! :biggrin:
However, if the cad allows "risk" mode of work, excuse me but this is a perfect example of "bad design"....
on commercial hp-cocreate-ptc I think like you, but if they sell, obviously they are right.. .
cacciatorino
Guest
I was joking, but you don't know what brainwashing did to me in the company when I was switched to modeling, just about the mistakes not to be made to live quietly, like "serious window" or "copy a level" etc. etc.
In the end, it's a cad you don't have to trust so much, which you can think about designing and background work without breaking your boxes. . .
And then I don't know, it will be that if and swx are very robust, but the errors in the charging phase of the axieme are very rare.
in relation to the regeneration of the parts, attention: it is performed only in phase of modification of the part. when the part is loaded from the server, the system reads the raw and naked geometry stored in the part file, while the "history" that led to that result is loaded only when needed: basically in the part file the geometry is described twice: as "block file" (the ficiurs tree) and as pure geometry (the solid base).
maxopus
Guest
this with ferrivecchi, I use 99% faces and plans and the "parastrubble" does not make a fold, neither in topa-daun nor in topa-ap.
In five and a half years, never seen a failed couple... unless I'm the one who's caxxate.
there are parastrubboli and parastrubboli... :smile: