Takeda
Guest
Hi, I wanted to know if someone could help me carry out the monometric axemetry of the attached file, I am new in using autocad.. .
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
how? you just need to copy the image.. .
in 3d extrude t and then make a cut, in the isometric view you see very well
Tristus
Guest
with the command "allega" (from the menu' in the top insert-allega) brings the jpg to autocad. from the pane just entered the transparency property of the background, so you can draw lines above seeing them. draw the t with a polylinea and then extrude it according to the height of the design. at this point you have to operate a tilted cut. to simplify the process creates a flat surface quite large and tilt according to the angle of the design. for cutting use the pull command with the cutting surface option, and select the sloping surface as a cutting surface. autocad will ask you if you want to store both portions of freshly cut solid. Tell him to and delete by hand the part of solid that does not need.
meccanicamg
Guest
but are you sure he has to redesign it in 3d? I think you have to copy it in 2d on the envelopes as if it were handmade with paper and pen.
made in 3d are capable all....
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
if he is not able to explain what he has to do and what help he needs we can also tell him how to put it on the bite and cut it by seghetto or make a plinth with kazzuola and level.
I suppose tristus trusted that the request was opened in the 3d modeling area; Unfortunately it happens that discussions are opened in the first section with a vague relevance, sometimes even with that.
I suppose tristus trusted that the request was opened in the 3d modeling area; Unfortunately it happens that discussions are opened in the first section with a vague relevance, sometimes even with that.
meccanicamg
Guest
and how do you do with the cobble?
If you don't put in the crates, you can't do it unless you use the bricks.
and use a 3d printer?
but if I bite it....you must use sweet jaws or it spoils everything.
Tristus
Guest
It's a waste of time using a cad to get to define a solid using that method. But above all, you make students hate the program by confusing their ideas. Those things must be done by hand, like once. the cad should be taught so that the student understands it in step, not messing it up right away with those systems that are good only for paper. You can also do with cad, it's clear, but the student who approaches the cad for the first time must teach him first to master him with other exercises, and only then you can mess him up with more complex exercises.
Why didn't you intervene by giving instructions on the procedure to be used by autocad?
Anyway, I recommend takingda to import the jpg to autocad as I described above. Cut out the frames and spread them as if you were working on paper, i.e. rotate them in 3d. after which it is simple, pull the lines drawn for each point. each point will therefore be identified by the intersection of the 3 lines departing from each panel.
in this way: (I did not draw the lines drawn) but just to show the procedure.
you could also operate differently, that is instead of importing the jpg, you could draw directly on the plans. You have to change the ucts from time to time.
Well, all of this is very scary for the first time in autocad, but the professors fuck off.
Attachments
Takeda
Guest
thank you very much for the very detailed answers, however in the end I had to do something like what I attached (which I was kindly provided by my partner).
ps. I may have mistaken the area where to put this post.
ps. I may have mistaken the area where to put this post.
Tristus
Guest
but in that way you are only providing him with the final result, which you could well get as we explained mammals and me.
the professor will want to see how the assonometry (presuming) has been carried out. when we students made them on paper we drew the 3 axes and then on each "wall" (the 2 vertical planes plus the horizontal one) we drew the projections, those that are seen in the drawing on the top left. at that point it is easy to identify each solid summit simply from the intersection of the 3 lines that start from the points drawn on the "paths". this is the process for the development. or better to say, the demonstration of how you get to define that solid starting from the design you posted previously. Now I see to draw something that explains what I mean.
ps controls that there are no frozen layers in the drawing, maybe the demonstration is in one of those layers
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
that made him identical spit. What did you learn from this?takeda said:
but you have not yet understood whether the request is:
do it in three-dimensional
make the 3 views (using autocad as a tecnigraph)
both things
It seems to me that you are not able to express a well-formed request, and in our detailed comments you have been noticed. but as always you read only what you want to readtakeda said:
Tristus
Guest
In fact in this way students learn little and begin to hate autocad immediately, defining it obsolete and Moroccan. not knowing that even more modern programs will still face the same problems. and the first unpleasant impression on autocad remains them imprinted immediately. the fault, to honor of the truth, is not of the students, but of certain professors, who teach to make 4 lines, some zoom and then tell the student "now turn this assonometry" - without having deepened how to move with the ucs, how to work on different planes etc. etc.
takeda has asked how the assonometry takes place, so it is clear that the procedure to follow is what would be followed by doing it on paper.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
if your purpose is to learn autocad, as tristus writes to do so starting from 3d, only because it is cooler, it is foolish.
making projections in that way is really sad; because it means not knowing what autocad is and how it should be used and why you are copying without knowing what you are doing.
making projections in that way is really sad; because it means not knowing what autocad is and how it should be used and why you are copying without knowing what you are doing.
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
Then the 3d is useless. especially if you do the projections as if you use the compass on the paper.
This, that the 3d does not serve anything, even a student should come
Tristus
Guest
This is the process, but I repeat, the process is a little bit sleek with any cad program, which programs serve to build solids faster.
but probably the professor wanted you to be imprisoned with autocad proposing an exercise that gave students when still the computer did not exist.
Anyway, I first imported the file you posted at the beginning, I drew on it by recalculating all lines. then I rotated in 3d the two projections, selecting the lines being part of each projection and turning them in 3d with the wheel command 3d. each solid summit is defined by the intersection of 3 lines. In the example I have identified (yellow) the first summit, and then you will have to continue for each summit, so as to have the final solid uniting the summits found with a line. the result would not be a solid, but only a series of edges that define the solid. place the design too, so you can take a more detailed look.
but probably the professor wanted you to be imprisoned with autocad proposing an exercise that gave students when still the computer did not exist.
Anyway, I first imported the file you posted at the beginning, I drew on it by recalculating all lines. then I rotated in 3d the two projections, selecting the lines being part of each projection and turning them in 3d with the wheel command 3d. each solid summit is defined by the intersection of 3 lines. In the example I have identified (yellow) the first summit, and then you will have to continue for each summit, so as to have the final solid uniting the summits found with a line. the result would not be a solid, but only a series of edges that define the solid. place the design too, so you can take a more detailed look.
Attachments
Tristus
Guest
recapitulating: import the image on autocad and draw us over all lines. in the properties of the imported image check the "background transparency" box in this way you can see the lines you draw over the image. when you're finished drawing the copy lines a little distant from the image. at that point it rotates in 3d the lines of each of the projections. you will have 3 panels that will help you define the solid.
I to speed I extruded the t and then operated the oblique cut with the pull command, always taking into account the vertical panel in which you clearly see the oblique side of the cut.
the cutting of the solid can be operated in different ways: I extruded the oblique cut line to form a nurbs surface and used the pull command with the surface option.
You can take a look at the design I'll attach and do it all the way. the right procedure is what I described in the previous post, i.e. identify each solid summit through the intersection of 3 lines.
I to speed I extruded the t and then operated the oblique cut with the pull command, always taking into account the vertical panel in which you clearly see the oblique side of the cut.
the cutting of the solid can be operated in different ways: I extruded the oblique cut line to form a nurbs surface and used the pull command with the surface option.
You can take a look at the design I'll attach and do it all the way. the right procedure is what I described in the previous post, i.e. identify each solid summit through the intersection of 3 lines.
Attachments
Tristus
Guest
Takeda
Guest
Thank you very much for the very detailed answer. However, I mention the delivery that the professor provided: "drawing, with measures to please, the orthogonal projection, the section and the monometric asonometry of the figure "t" attached "
frasco
Guest
Hello.
takeda asks for lumens on how to make with autocad l monometric assonometry of an object.
with pure autocad that assonometry si si design design design (only in 2d) using the cad as an electronic tecnigraph, as if he drew on paper with pencil, team and compass. this because I place the axis z vertical axes x e y (which usually define the horizontal plane) must maintain an angle of 90°.
I can't believe
takeda asks for lumens on how to make with autocad l monometric assonometry of an object.
with pure autocad that assonometry si si design design design (only in 2d) using the cad as an electronic tecnigraph, as if he drew on paper with pencil, team and compass. this because I place the axis z vertical axes x e y (which usually define the horizontal plane) must maintain an angle of 90°.
I can't believe
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
I completely dissociate myself from what you write.
This is a barbaric way of using autocad. in autocad 2d you draw 2 projections and then copying and rotating one of them draws the third.
I want to see how to make a complex design, how could it be a wagon or a building, making projections with semicircles. . .