gerod
Guest
What does that mean?
Do you have to assimilate him?
starts from a fixed piece.... I would say the carcass and starts to bind!
Do you have to assimilate him?
starts from a fixed piece.... I would say the carcass and starts to bind!
meccanicamg
Guest
this design is already present on our forum and has already been discussed how and what to do and especially the various errors or notes
ornitorinco91
Guest
where can I find mechanicalmg?
meccanicamg
Guest
you need to search the forum from the panel. However in the discussions of students or mechanical designs you will find so many kinds of gearboxes done so because this year they were all fixed with that design.
ornitorinco91
Guest
meccanicamg
Guest
like that:finger: then you have to see what you need
ornitorinco91
Guest
practically gives me the size 10 my table... from that I have to find all the measures to achieve the conical reducer?
sampom
Guest
to me it seems that that quota is worth 100, and not 10 (but how do you look?). and of course you need to calculate the scale and get all the other dimensions.
ornitorinco91
Guest
Guys. where can I find the distinct components of the conical wheel reducer? found in my first attachment.
Fulvio Romano
Guest
who:http://www.cad3d.it/forum1/showpost.php?p=279628&postcount=1only that instead of being a separate list, it is "disegnata". . .
gerod
Guest
What kind of question is that?
If you posted it, you'll know the source.
Sometimes I just don't understand you...
If you posted it, you'll know the source.
Sometimes I just don't understand you...
ornitorinco91
Guest
I felt bad... I meant the names of the reducer components... (the separate component)... not the annex. . .
Why do I need them as I have to go in the drawing table... okay?
Why do I need them as I have to go in the drawing table... okay?
MassiVonWeizen
Guest
I suppose it's part of the exercise/work you have to do. . .
Fulvio Romano
Guest
certainly is part of the exercise.
But I see you're still afraid of trivial demands and desperately ask for help without stopping a moment to reason.
the fact is that, perhaps legacy of wrong schools, you are sure that there is a precise and unique way to solve a problem. Since you don't know him, panic. this is true only for very simple problems. 2+2=4, there's not much to discuss, but if on the separate I write "fall of the reducer" and you "box of the reducer", is it not that by chance is equivalent?
therefore. What is the distinct component? a list of pieces that goes into the builder's hand to understand what to build. some will be drawing, others will be standard. for the standard ones there is not much to invent. I would not write "irreversible type helical hollow device to increase specific pressure", but more simply "victims". for those drawing you can give a name that makes you understand what it is. once again it is better to use terms of the type "shaft" rather than "cylindrical rod".
Shall we try to make a list?
> n. 2 - roller bearing dxx
> n 6 - screw te m12 x 25
> n.1 - conical toothed wheel of xxxx
> n.1 - tree dis. yyy
> ...
> ...
You keep going?
ornitorinco91
Guest
Exatem
Guest
That's not good.Okay now? I tried to try to make myself
apart from that I do not like some line thicknesses, restraints, etc. in the table misses the column "material", missing the column of references (as it says fulvio "ruota dentata see dis...").
You write "cuscinetto" and then? What bearing, do you know how many there are?
the table must escape any doubt to those who must realize, assemble, the artifact. can't just be a list of parts.
tartufon80
Guest
quoto, I would also add the quantities for each component present in separate: many times it helps!! !
Fulvio Romano
Guest
not only, but ball bearing, rollers, otherwise it could also be a goose feather pad, no?! ?
the bearing is part of the "standard", as a screw. if for the screw you write "te m20" also for the bearing you have to specify something more. Maybe the code skf!
in my post I wrote:
where you find both the type of bearing, and the diameter, and the number of components. And that's not all.
put yourself in the shoes of who has to build. Would that list be enough for you?
What are you doing? you start with the fruit and then you realize that I didn't tell you what fruit (code skf), how many pounds (number of pieces)?
last known controversy. post #15 hours 14.22. post #16 hours 14.46. 21 minutes to receive the post notice, open the browser, read the post, update the design, and post the result. Don't you think that's a little? Don't you think if you were posting tomorrow at the same time maybe you came alone to what we're saying?
