• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

parametric relationships and use of macros

  • Thread starter Thread starter cersil
  • Start date Start date
would be useful for the forum if you report your progress. . .
good morning to all, if it interests me I have created a library of vines using the tables in excel. for example a file only with n configurations for the vine you. if you want to let me know that I send, because here I can't tie it
 
zip the files and attach.
there is the subsection useful resources of the solidworks area where you can attach these files.
specifies the version in which they are created and maybe export and attach the excel table so that those with other versions can use it
 
but how many configurations have you created in order to make it weigh so much?
 
it would be better to make 4 files.
search between 3000 configurations is not the maximum of life
and think you've only done 4 diameters
 
it would be better to make 4 files.
search between 3000 configurations is not the maximum of life
and think you've only done 4 diameters
I did it because I was comfortable when the mountains in the axieme, switch between a diameter and another or one length and another, however everyone can set it as they want.
The research is not even so slow, I thought of worse. However the file is free, everyone can manage the excel table as they want.

actually the diameters are:
4-5-6-8-10-12-14-16-18-20-22-24-27-30-33-36-42-45-48

Don't you see everyone?
 
My fault, I read m4 to m8.if you cannot cad attach a whole file you can always make a copy with only one material and add instructions to create other materials.
 
My fault, I read m4 to m8.if you cannot cad attach a whole file you can always make a copy with only one material and add instructions to create other materials.
I tried to delete all configurations, but the file remains from 3 mega. I wanted to send files without configurations and table excel, but it doesn't change much. strange... there are 5 features
 
clarification,
in the previous post I glued a direct link,
but obviously it was tarpaed.
is part of the policy of this forum not to allow references to competing sites?
 
the tutorial for data tables is already present among those included in solidworks.
 
grabcad I don't think it's considered a competing site.
However if you want clarification you have to contact the moderators
 
is a good resource for sure.
But a novice how can you know that the user did a proper tutorial? on what basis can he know?
the title "user of grabcad" should be synonymous with trust? Why?

youtube for example is full of tutorials, but not all are well made.

Solidworks internal tutorials are done well and are understandable if you do it by degrees.
if you do random tutorials, based on the pleasure or need of the moment, without having prior bases risk being done badly and without cognition
 
I was precipitous, I thought the link didn't work.
returning to the merits, without prejudice to the need to deepen the topic on official resources, the validity of the tutorial is that it could have a side view compared to the standard, an extra stimulus.
How does the novice trust?
Try and see if it works.
no one has the official driver's license less than other bloggers who are on the same floor.
 
How does the novice trust?
Try and see if it works.
I don't think so.
the novice has no tools to evaluate what is watching and follow a tutorial that gives a result, but it does it with a wrong method, you want for the concept or because it does not explain the logic, it is deleterious for the knowledge of the novice which will take for granted that it is the correct method.
external tutorials are useful for integrating knowledge with the skills to evaluate its quality.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top