parametric together

[tonygancio]

Hello everyone,
I am trying to create a parametric set to be able in a short time to configure a machine that could be customized: it can be longer/ shorter, high/low and according to the measurements the axieme must behave in a certain way.
now, according to you what is the most convenient method to use by calculating that also go library parts (cuscinets, motors, straps etc.)?
I thought about the multibody but here I can't insert the library parts (at least I don't know the method to do it) or iassembly of ipart, or ilogic of the individual parts and then axiemarlo "by hand".
if you have other proposals are welcome!
Thank you so much to all!
No

 

[ceschi1959]

Hello everyone,
I am trying to create a parametric set to be able in a short time to configure a machine that could be customized: it can be longer/ shorter, high/low and according to the measurements the axieme must behave in a certain way.
now, according to you what is the most convenient method to use by calculating that also go library parts (cuscinets, motors, straps etc.)?
I thought about the multibody but here I can't insert the library parts (at least I don't know the method to do it) or iassembly of ipart, or ilogic of the individual parts and then axiemarlo "by hand".
if you have other proposals are welcome!
Thank you so much to all!
No

what you want is the classic top-down design, which in principle is created a part with all the specifications that interest you, through sketches, plans and so on that then are connected-copyed to the derived parts.
Every cad has his technique, I could talk to you about nx but I don't know how much help you can.
Look here

ciao

 

[Cast16]

Hello everyone,

I thought about the multibody but here I can't insert the library parts (at least I don't know the method to do it)
No

the parts you can insert in the assy drivata from the multibody.
I'm not saying multibody is the best alternative. to decide, you need to know better the complexity of your subject.
in the previous video the author is using "project geometry" between the parts: by personal experience, it's not always reliable and there's no worse to not know if for example the hole will be where it was supposed to be when the axieme is complex and you can't always notice.

give an occiata here for the different alternatives:https://www.autodesk.com/autodesk-u...ssembly-modeling-techniques-2013#presentation