problem sp04

[Max-C]

it would be interesting to know how long a machine lasts on average because of updates and how much time you lose to "laugh" it because of a version change.

we say that in the version changes you have to do them with a little attention;
normally any update requires only permissions then think of it alone to delete, edit add files.
if I have to install a new version, instead, some extra shortening to do is there. for example clean the superfluous and then install the new version without finding any residue... or install the new and, once consolidated, remove the previous one.

Obviously if installing versions as if they were upgrades it is a matter of time before the cad gives problems.. .

 

[teseo]

Hi.
I try to make the diagnosis:
1) PC problems (graphic)
2) PC problems (graphic)
3) PC problems (graphic). It seems impossible but it is.
4-5-6-7 ) format
8) we handle dense straps with formulas (and springs...and many other details, and the only problem we had is with international settings, point or comma? ).

according to me...form and reinstall. You'll see everything's gonna be okay then.

Sorry, but I have to format every six months. I don't have to... .

Anyway
I wanted some clarifications on computer graphics problems

I have a 4000 picture with updated drivers if I try to uninstall the card and areinstall only what you say?? ? ?

for the problem of excel is this since 2008 and I assure you that I have shaved more and more times; I'll explain.

go in configuration manager create configuration we talk about a simple aluminum profile I create another longer
I make automatic creation data table creates me table and two configurations with the lengths now I create another 400 how?
then I go to the third row I take the previous lengths and drag them down so to automatically create all the first lengths problem does not recognize that it is a number then I have to resume the cells and give number then I go to the cell description I put the replacement formula I give the data in the formula so to create the descrizioen automatically other problem does not recognize the cell value and it makes me see the formula and not the result so I have to go to the cell give general value back ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

boh then maybe I have the untied machine is a hp workstation of 3 years xeon 3.2ghz 10gb 64bit disk ahimè not ssd but I don't think that counts much at least hope picture card 4000 I don't think I'm put very bad to hardware..... .

Hello and thank you

 

[maxopus]

I'll give you an example. I shaved it a 6 months ago because I took away the old sas disk at 15,000 to install a ssd. the machine still had the installation of the ox of dell and it is of 2010.
it is not a problem of swx, often formatting is required because the user installs everything and the pc slows down, but the fault is of the user, you can not prevent a pc and expect it to run.
not to mention the hardware.... there are people who continue to complain about graphics and then have vga entry level of gaming... but certifications for what do they do to her?
the pc that I have at home and that I use to work from home is a core 2 duo of 2008 with 8 gb of ram and picture fx 1700 and ssd from 256. turns very well in the norm, sits with mega assemblies, but on this point I have seen that I create sit in the same way (I also think before)

Sure that if you instill a car or use cards to gamer it does not work.

by curiosity have you tried to install swx 2014 on a machine with xp64, 8 giga ram, a fx3500 and an old opteron dual core or similar stuff?
I on those I ran wildfire 2, wildfire 3, wildfire 4, wildfire 5, creo element pro5, creo parametric 1, creo parametric 2.
now should not turn creo parametric 3, because it seems that the minimum requirement is windows 7.

I don't even believe if you show me.
Maybe you have a machine that is certified for your software but it's not for creo.
the very fact that the creo files weigh less at equal geometry says long, as it says long the fact that the step exported by I create weights less than the step exported by a cad parasolid any.
but you know how I am attached to the "bimbo" and I always defend it

 

[maxopus]

ok maxopus excuse I didn't understand the joke....:frown:

but by curiosity that you use.... you never know

pro/e, I create parametric... and if they do not caxxate I will never change it.

 

[teseo]

grandisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

now a question how did you know???? where this idea came from

Two thousand thanks

Hi.

 

[teseo]

I would not like to take advantage of it but it is not that you can send away also this error "the dwg document management library is not valid or lacks to see your administrator(y contacted assistance answer wait next service pack)


Thank you.

 

[re_solidworks]

Sure that if you instill a car or use cards to gamer it does not work.

by curiosity have you tried to install swx 2014 on a machine with xp64, 8 giga ram, a fx3500 and an old opteron dual core or similar stuff?
I on those I ran wildfire 2, wildfire 3, wildfire 4, wildfire 5, creo element pro5, creo parametric 1, creo parametric 2.
now should not turn creo parametric 3, because it seems that the minimum requirement is windows 7.

I don't even believe if you show me.
Maybe you have a machine that is certified for your software but it's not for creo.
the very fact that the creo files weigh less at equal geometry says long, as it says long the fact that the step exported by I create weights less than the step exported by a cad parasolid any.
but you know how I am attached to the "bimbo" and I always defend it

max, I told you about what hardware I use swx, a assembled core 2 duo e6750 with 8 gb ram and I assure you that it's okay. fx 1700 is not higher than fx 3500, indeed...
I also have 2 workstations of 2007 with 3500 picture and are slightly higher than the pc I mentioned. I am no longer using them as, although swx spins, a cooler workstation makes more and here time is money. last year I was from a client who works with a hp workstation with fx 3450 painting and works there to make medium-large assemblies.
creo is much more powerful in the management of complex geometries, in the reconstruction of series of functions (if made with the copy of faces) and in the management of stl. In the big assemblies I saw it scarier than swx and when a trainer told me that I create it was more powerful and I asked him to show me how it was moving in a big set... He tried, but the witness didn't even open.
the smaller files of creo are a ball to the foot for me, when I have to move them on the net the copy slows down drastically (always on those), with the files too small the latency becomes very annoying. swx files don't give me this problem. in any case if you can install swx there are no problems, I formatted very sporadically and only when I have problems with the machine, but do not depend on swx.
the installation of fully configured swx costs me 15 minutes (with the administrative image) and the launch simultaneously on all stations if necessary.
These are not cad problems, they are configuration/install problems without respecting all necessary crisms.
with this I think that I create is great cad, but he also does not have only merits. Ah, I forgot, I also crash sometimes! :tongue:

 

[re_solidworks]

I just add one thing... swx use by customers for spot interventions also on a surface pro 3 that does not even have dedicated graphics and also works well in this case. Obviously that with a workstation you have different performance, but we are talking about a tablet!! !

 

[essebi]

we feel, now solidworks is also better than I create...

 

[maxopus]

max, I told you about what hardware I use swx, a assembled core 2 duo e6750 with 8 gb ram and I assure you that it's okay. fx 1700 is not higher than fx 3500, indeed...
I also have 2 workstations of 2007 with 3500 picture and are slightly higher than the pc I mentioned. I am no longer using them as, although swx spins, a cooler workstation makes more and here time is money. last year I was from a client who works with a hp workstation with fx 3450 painting and works there to make medium-large assemblies.
creo is much more powerful in the management of complex geometries, in the reconstruction of series of functions (if made with the copy of faces) and in the management of stl. In the big assemblies I saw it scarier than swx and when a trainer told me that I create it was more powerful and I asked him to show me how it was moving in a big set... He tried, but the witness didn't even open.
the smaller files of creo are a ball to the foot for me, when I have to move them on the net the copy slows down drastically (always on those), with the files too small the latency becomes very annoying. swx files don't give me this problem. in any case if you can install swx there are no problems, I formatted very sporadically and only when I have problems with the machine, but do not depend on swx.
the installation of fully configured swx costs me 15 minutes (with the administrative image) and the launch simultaneously on all stations if necessary.
These are not cad problems, they are configuration/install problems without respecting all necessary crisms.
with this I think that I create is great cad, but he also does not have only merits. Ah, I forgot, I also crash sometimes! :tongue:

the fact that crashes occasionally is due exclusively to that s.o. called windows.
try for unix versions and then tell me if it crashes.
for windows installations there are no "crisms" and there are no "madonne", installations always work as long as the graphics card is not from gamer and the ram is not 1/2 giga.

 

[maxopus]

now the small files are a ball to the foot... obviously there is something wrong.
It's like saying that a hundred-meterer runs better if he has the "pancy".

 

[meccanicamg]

grandisssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss



now a question how did you know???? where this idea came from



Two thousand thanks



Hi.

I deduced it because looking on microsoft that dll is to turn the net framework, so as wax attempt to reinstall or correct the installation of the same.

 

[re_solidworks]

we feel, now solidworks is also better than I create...

It's not better and it's not worse. is more effective for certain works, absolutely inadequate for others. Haven't you ever wondered why I create today doesn't sink? there are 2 categories of cad: hi range and my range. Today I grow up trying to do everything and do everything. in my opinion this attempt to do everything makes it less optimized both in one segment and in the other.
However after I have experienced it, I think that swx is more efficient in the work I do. be sure that if one day I had to realize the opposite I would not hesitate to change the way.. .

 

[re_solidworks]

now the small files are a ball to the foot... obviously there is something wrong.
It's like saying that a hundred-meterer runs better if he has the "pancy".

where do you upload files? from a local resource or directly from the network? I guarantee that in the second case sex charge much faster... .

 

[re_solidworks]

the fact that crashes occasionally is due exclusively to that s.o. called windows.
try for unix versions and then tell me if it crashes.
for windows installations there are no "crisms" and there are no "madonne", installations always work as long as the graphics card is not from gamer and the ram is not 1/2 giga.

I only use certified machines and are for all cad. still exists the version for unix? because it seems to me that from creo they only support windows. if what I remember is correct, why abandon an efficient os to the advantage of a bowl?

 

[maxopus]

where do you upload files? from a local resource or directly from the network? I guarantee that in the second case sex charge much faster... .

I work on the network... and to load 100 files from 500 k I put less than to load 100 files from 700 k, it seems logical.

 

[maxopus]

I only use certified machines and are for all cad. still exists the version for unix? because it seems to me that from creo they only support windows. if what I remember is correct, why abandon an efficient os to the advantage of a bowl?

You're right, the porting now is just on windows.
the development of a porting towards a know, because the number of requests does not justify the maintenance of the development group. until the wf3 there was also porting on linux and was abandoned for the same reasons.

 

[maxopus]

I guarantee that on unix platforms the good pro/e was zero crash ... a former colleague who worked on us did not see a crash in 4 years.

 

[PaoloR1]

a continuous give gdtanalysissupport.dll errors.

 

[meccanicamg]

with the latest windows updates has disappeared....misters of the minchiate for windows 10