• This forum is the machine-generated translation of www.cad3d.it/forum1 - the Italian design community. Several terms are not translated correctly.

problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter luca984
  • Start date Start date
Forgive me, I'm not the expert here, but just a puzzler who wants to learn... But couldn't you do those areas with a series of sweeps instead of filling it with pieces?

I'll give you an example to make me understand even if there are parts that should be corrected.. but just to make the idea. .
 

Attachments

Um... Then it is predicted that I beg like you are neophyte, the sweep command I know little and I use it more for surfaces with a sform angle, what you did you seem to be good I will try to slew on hi :finger:
 
Bye.
this is how much I managed to do as fitting correction using gsd and leaving unchanged the surfaces you posted.
the result is not satisfactory but the fault is of the original surfaces that I deliberately did not touch and on which I tried to do the best I could.
In order to improve the result, all the surfaces that seem to be thrown by chance should be corrected. If the client gave you the opportunity to tell him to give it back otherwise leave it so and then what will come out of the milling will be his business (but warn him).
if you did it with the offset command then you have to be careful; In principle the offset should give satisfactory results as long as the aesthetic surfaces (class a) on which this command applies are done as necessary. considering that lately this happens seldom then also the offset leaves to want. in this regard I give you advice: from the offset to the surfaces alternately and those not obtained with the offset create them with the command "connection".
I hope I haven't created you any further confusion.
we waved
 

Attachments

Bye.
this is how much I managed to do as fitting correction using gsd and leaving unchanged the surfaces you posted.
the result is not satisfactory but the fault is of the original surfaces that I deliberately did not touch and on which I tried to do the best I could.
In order to improve the result, all the surfaces that seem to be thrown by chance should be corrected. If the client gave you the opportunity to tell him to give it back otherwise leave it so and then what will come out of the milling will be his business (but warn him).
if you did it with the offset command then you have to be careful; In principle the offset should give satisfactory results as long as the aesthetic surfaces (class a) on which this command applies are done as necessary. considering that lately this happens seldom then also the offset leaves to want. in this regard I give you advice: from the offset to the surfaces alternately and those not obtained with the offset create them with the command "connection".
I hope I haven't created you any further confusion.
we waved
You have wondered why those surfaces were created by me, because loffset nn m had created all the surfaces now I will try to do as you say thank you:finger:
 

Forum statistics

Threads
44,997
Messages
339,767
Members
4
Latest member
ibt

Members online

No members online now.
Back
Top